Identification of information needs in intellectual capital: exploratory study on the Tunisian financial market

  • Authors

    • Jihene Ferchichi economic and management
    • Robert Paturel
    2016-05-04
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijaes.v4i1.5858
  • Delphi Method, Financial Markets, Informational Needs, Intellectual Capital, Perception.

  • Abstract

    In an economy concretized by the broadening notion of the intellectual capital and its increasing role in investment decisions, it seems appropriate to conceive the intellectual capital by measuring its perception by 22 Tunisian financial professionals. Therefore, the aim of this work consists, firstly, to enable a better understanding of the intellectual capital of the Tunisian financial market. Secondly, by adopting the Delphi method, we determined the information needs and expectations' consensus in terms of intellectual capital. The results from this research show that the concept of intellectual capital appears well known by the financial actors Tunisians. Besides this research, revealed new aspects of intellectual capital. The Tunisian investors consider these dimensions as important criteria that support making their investment decision.

    Delphi Method; Financial Markets; Informational Needs; Intellectual Capital; Perception.

  • References

    1. Ahmed A and Hussainey K (2010) Managers' and auditors' perceptions of intellectual capital reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 25 Iss: 9, pp.844 – 860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02686901011080035.
    2. Barth M E, Clement M B, Foster G, and Kasznik R (2000) Brand values and capital market valuation. Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 3, pp.41–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009620132177.
    3. Beattie V and Pratt K (2002b) Disclosure items in a comprehensive model of business reporting: an empirical evaluation. Working paper, University of Stirling.
    4. Béjar Y (2006) Perception du capital immatériel par le marché financier français. Journal International des Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication, n°33, p10-15.
    5. Béjar Y (2006) La valeur informationnelle du capital immatériel: application aux entreprises technologiques nouvellement introduites en bourse (1997-2004). Working paper; université paris Dauphine, Novembre 2006, p 80-83.
    6. Belal A and Roberts R (2010) Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2): 311-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0511-4.
    7. Breton G and Taffler R (2001) Accounting Information and Analyst Stock Recommendation Decisions: A Content Analysis Approach. Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 31, N° 2, spring, pp. 91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2001.9729604.
    8. Bounfour A (2000) La valeur dynamique du capital immatériel. Revue Française de gestion, n°17, pp 111-123.
    9. Bukh N (2003) the relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: a paradox? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570310464273.
    10. Cazavan A (2004) Le ratio market-to-book et la reconnaissance des immatériels - Une étude du marché français. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, Tome 10, Vol. 2, décembre.
    11. .Chahine S and Mathieu J (2003) Valorisation stratégique par contextes de valeur: le cas des introductions sur le Nouveau marché. Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, Vol. 6, issue 2, p 91-114.
    12. Curado C (2008) Perceptions of knowledge management and intellectual capital in the banking industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 12 Issue: 3, pp.141 – 155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270810875921.
    13. Eccles R G, Hertz R H, Keegan E M and Phillips D M (2001) The Value Reporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game. New York, United States of America: John Wiley and Sons.
    14. Edvinsson L and Malone M (1997) Intellectual Capital: Realizing your company true value by finding its hidden Brainpower. Harper Business, 1997, New York.
    15. Feranadez. E, Montes J.and Vazquez C (2000) Typology and Strategic analysis of intangible resources: A resource-based approach. Innovation, Vol. 20, pp. 81-92.
    16. Ferreira A and Martinez L (2011) Intellectual capital: Perception of Productivity and Investment. RAC, Curitiba, v. 15, n. 2, art. 5, pp. 249-260, Mar. /Abr. 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1415-65552011000200006.
    17. Frotiee P and Andrieu M (1998) Valeur actionnariale et immatérielle. Analyse financière, n°116.
    18. García-Meca E and Martínez I (2007) The use of intellectual capital information in investment decisions: An empirical study using analyst reports. The International Journal of Accounting, Vol 42, pp. 57–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2006.12.003.
    19. Healy P and Palepu K (2001) A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 31, Issues 1-3.
    20. Lev B (2001) Intangibles: management, measuring and reporting. Brookings Institution Press,Washington,DC .
    21. Lev B and Radhakrishnan S (2003) The Measurement of firm-specific organisation capital. Working Paper, n°.9581.
    22. Mavrinac S and Siesfeld A (1997) Measures that matter, An exploratory investigation of investors information needs and value properties. In Enterprise Value in the Knowledge Economy, OECD and Ernst & Young Center for Business innovation, Cambridge, MA.
    23. Miller W (1999) Building the Ultimate Resource. Management Review, Jan. 1999, 42-45.
    24. Schmidt R (1997) Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, n°3, pp. 763-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Ferchichi, J., & Paturel, R. (2016). Identification of information needs in intellectual capital: exploratory study on the Tunisian financial market. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 4(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijaes.v4i1.5858

    Received date: 2016-02-10

    Accepted date: 2016-03-13

    Published date: 2016-05-04