Yield, quality and cost of jute (Corchorus species) seed production as influenced by herbicide application time
-
2020-09-19 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijag.v8i2.31012 -
Jute Seed, Herbicide Application Time, Yield and Quality. -
Abstract
Jute is the most important fibre crop for Bangladesh and second important for world. Bangladesh requires about 6000 tons of jute seed. Among this quantity Bangladesh produce whole amount of Corchorus capsularis L. (white jute) seed but only very little amount of Corchorus olitorius L. (tossa jute) seed. Production of tossa jute seed is not too profitable because of high production cost for that reason farmers of Bangladesh are not interested to produce seed of tossa jute. And production cost of jute seed is mainly associated with labor cost that is mainly for weeding. This study was conducted to assess the best herbicide application time to enhance seed productivity, quality and reduction the cost of production. In this experiment two Corchorus species were grown using three different herbicide application times and no herbicide application used as control. The results indicated that for tossa jute (BJRI tossa pat-8) maximum plant population, plant height, branch/plant, capsule/plant, seed/capsule, seed yield, germination capacity, field emergence capacity, seed vigour and CVG were found in Control plot. Maximum 1000 seed weight and MGT were recorded in herbicide applied at 13th days after cutting transplanting. Maximum capsule length found at 10th days of herbicide application. For white jute (CVL-1) highest plant population, plant height, branch/plant, seed/capsule, capsule length, germination capacity, field emergence capacity, seed vigour and CVG were recorded in control plot. Highest capsule/plant, 1000 seed weight and seed yield were found in herbicide applied at 13th days after cutting transplanting. Maximum MGT found in herbicide applied at 16th days after cutting transplanting. Result revealed that herbicide use reduce the production cost of jute seed compare to manual seed production technology.
Â
Â
Â
-
References
- Alam, A.T.M.M. 2003. “Present status and future strategies of weed management in jute fieldâ€. Jute and Jute Fabrics, Bangladesh. News letter of Bangladesh Jute Res. Inst. January-March. pp. 4-6.
[2] Alam, M. A., M.A.F. Mollah, Z.A. Rafiq, M.S.A. Sarker, M.N.H. Rony and M.Z. Tareq. 2019. Effect of plant age for cuttings on the growth and seed yield in late season jute under different planting spacings. J. Expt. Biosci. 10(2):1-8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324983236
[3] Ali, S. M., M. M. Haque, A. B. Siddique, A. F. Mollah and M. N. Islam. 2003. Phenology growth and seed yield of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) in late sown technology. Bangladesh J. of Agri. 27 & 28: 91-97.
[4] BBS. 2018. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Ministry of Planning and Statistics Division, Govt. of People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. Pp. 170. Website: http://www.bbs.gov.bd
[5] Bennett, A.C. and D.R. Shaw. 2000. Effect of pre-harvest desiccants on weed seed production and viability. Weed Technol. 14, 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0530:EOPDOW]2.0.CO;2.
[6] Das, M., P. Poddar, S. Haque, S. Pati, R. Poddar and C.K. Kundu. 2014. Yield and economics of white jute as influenced by different dates of sowing, spacing and topping schedule in Terai region of West Bengal. In. J. of Farm Sci. 4(4): 51-58. doi: 10.5958/2250-0499.2020
[7] Datta, M.K., P. Hslder, U. Biswas and C.K. Kundu. 2017. Effect of Different Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Tossa Jute (Corchorus olitorius) in the New Alluvial Zone of West Bengal, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(11): 1118-1123. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.132.
[8] Ghorai, A.K., A.K. Chakraborty, N.C. Pandit, R.K. Mondal and C.R. Biswas.2004. Grass weed control in jute by Targa super (quizalofop-ethyl 5% EC). Pestology 28: 31–34.
[9] Ghorai, A.K., H. Chowdhury, M. Kumar and S. Kumar. 2013. Technology for weed management in Jute. Indian Farming 63(6): 12–14.
[10] Ghosh, R.K., T. Sreewongchai, S. Nakasathien and C. Phumichai. 2013. Phenotypic variation and the relationships among jute (Corchorus species) genotypes using morpho-agronomic traits and multivariate analysis. AJCS 7(6):830-842. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268391162
[11] Gianessi, L. P. 2013. The increasing importance of herbicides in worldwide crop production, Pest Manage. Sci. 69 (10):1099-1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3598.
[12] Hossain, M.B., S. Haque and H. Khan, 2002. DNA Fingerprinting of jute germplasm by RAPD. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35:414-419. https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2002.35.4.414.
[13] Hossen M., M.S. Ali, M. Begum, A. Khatton and A. Halim. 2008. Study on high yield of quality jute seed production for diversified uses. J Innov. Dev. Strategy. 2:71-73.
[14] Islam, M. 2014. Research Advances of Jute Field Weeds in Bangladesh: A Review. ARPN J. of Sci. and Tech. 4(4): 242.268.
[15] Islam, M. 2009. Jute Seed Technology. 397, Middle Monipur, Mirpur, Dhaka. p. 01.
[16] Mamun. M., C. K. Saha, M. G. Mostofa, A. Miah and M. Z. Hossain. 2017. Identification of suitable varieties for seed production of jute in non-traditional areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Pl. Breed. Genet. 30(1): 33-37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328252829. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjpbg.v30i1.36531.
[17] Mir, R.R., S. Rustgi, S. Sharma, R. Singh, A. Goyal, J. Kumar, A. Gaur, A.K. Tyagi, H. Khan, M.K. Sinha, H.S. Balyan, and P.K. Gupta. 2008. A preliminary genetic analysis of fiber traits and the use of new genomic SSRs for genetic diversity in jute. Euphytica. 161:413-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9597-x.
[18] Parvez, M. S., M.A. Salam, H.K. Noguchi and M. Begum. 2013. Effect of cultivar and weeding regime on the performance of transplant aman rice, Intl. J. Agri Crop Sci. Vol., 6 (11):654-666.
[19] Ratnayake, S. and D.R. Shaw. 1992. Effects of harvest aid herbicides on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) seed yield and quality. Weed Technol. 6:985–989. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00036587.
[20] Saha, C.K. 2011. Jute Seed Management in Bangladesh. Proceedings, International Seminar on Strengthening of Collaboration for Jute, Kenaf and Allied Fibres Research and Development, 2011. International Jute Study Group (IJSG), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
[21] Sarkar S. 2006. Weed management in jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) by post emergence herbicides. J. of Trop. Agri. 44 (1-2): 71-73.
[22] Saunders, M. 2001. Recovery plan for the endangered native jute species, Corchorus cunninghamii F. Muell in Queensland (2001-2006). Natural Heritage Trust, Australia, pp. 1-29.
[23] Shah, M.A., A. Manaf, M. Hussain, S. Farooq and M.Z.U. Hye. 2013. Sulphur fertilization improves the sesame productivity and economic returns under rain-fed conditions. Int. J. Agric. Biol 15:1301–1306.
[24] Simmons, B., 2006. Soil properties and herbicide behavior, Proceedings: Indiana CCA Conference, Indianapolis.
[25] Sinha, N.K., D. Singh and D.K. Roy. 2009. Weed management strategies in jute grown for seed production in calcareous soils of north Bihar. Indian J. of weed Sci. 41(1&2), 19–22.
[26] Wilson, R.G. and J.A. Smith. 2002. Influence of harvest aid herbicides on dry bean (Phaseolus vlugaris) desiccation, seed yield, and quality. Weed Technol. 16, 109–166. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0109:IOHAHO]2.0.CO;2.
[27] Zhang, T., E.N. Johnson and V.J. Willenborg. 2016. Evaluation of harvest aid herbicides as desiccants in lentil production. Weed. Technol. 30, 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-16-00007.1.
- Alam, A.T.M.M. 2003. “Present status and future strategies of weed management in jute fieldâ€. Jute and Jute Fabrics, Bangladesh. News letter of Bangladesh Jute Res. Inst. January-March. pp. 4-6.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Meftahul Karim, M., Lutfar Rahman, M., Ferdush, J., Zablul Tareq, M., Mukul Mia, M., Tipu Sultan, M., & Mujib Himel, R. (2020). Yield, quality and cost of jute (Corchorus species) seed production as influenced by herbicide application time. International Journal of Advanced Geosciences, 8(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijag.v8i2.31012Received date: 2020-07-14
Accepted date: 2020-08-23
Published date: 2020-09-19