Globalizing nursing science: analysis of nursing’s participation in the open access movement from 1993 to 2014

  • Authors

    • Jan M Nick School of Nursing, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California and Department of Nursing, Saniku Gakuin College, Otaki-machi, Chiba-ken, Japan
    2015-06-18
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijans.v4i2.4538
  • Dissemination Science, DOAJ, Globalization, Nursing Science, Open Access.

  • Abstract

    Background: The traditional journal subscription model restricts access to scholarly information since proprietary fee-based databases charge high subscription fees, do not provide access to all journals in the same geographic region, and include minimal access to research journals from other countries. This practice insulates nursing knowledge, causes duplication rather than replication of research, and results in a lack of breadth and depth to our science.

    Objective: Describe the state of nursing participation in the Open Access (OA) movement.

    Methods: Using a descriptive, exploratory approach, all nursing journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) data warehouse were extracted, tagged, and analyzed.

    Results: Sixty-two nursing journals from 23 countries have registered as Open Access. Brazil publishes the largest number of OA nursing journals (14), followed by the U.S. (9) and Spain (9). Two countries publish four OA nursing journals (Canada, Iran), while the remaining 18 countries publish one or two OA nursing journals. Fifty percent publish in either Spanish, Portuguese, or Spanish/Portuguese, while another one-third (32%) publish in English. Importantly, 82% of OA Nursing journals do not require article processing charges; of those who do have APCs, the majority (66%) are $300 or less.

    Conclusions: Although nursing participated early in the OA movement, growth has been consistent but sluggish. Neither the size of the country nor economic status seem to have a strong influence on decisions to produce OA nursing journals. Encouraging participation in OA will advance the science of nursing by allowing broader and more coordinated access to information to the global community.

  • References

    1. [1] Amaral P & Carvalho AM (2014) Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact. John Benjamins Publishing Co, Philadelphia, pp 175-202.

      [2] American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2008) the essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Essential IV. Available at: www.aacn.nche.edu/dnp/pdf/essentials.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2015.

      [3] Atchison A & Bull J (2015) Will Open Access Get Me Cited? An Analysis of the Efficacy of Open Access Publishing in Political Science. Political Science & Politics, 48(1), 129-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001668.

      [4] Björk B & Solomon D (2012) Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10, 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.

      [5] Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002, February 14) Available at: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Accessed March 3, 2015.

      [6] Edwards R & Shulenburger D (2003) The High Cost of Scholarly Journals (and what to do about it). Change, 35(6), 10-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604123.

      [7] HIMSS (2011, June 17) Position Statement on Transforming Nursing Practice through Technology & Informatics. Available at: http://www.himss.org/library/nursing-informatics/position-statement. Accessed March 2, 2015.

      [8] ICN (2014) Position Statement: The right to connect via information and communication technology. Available at: http://www.icn.ch/publications/position-statements/. Accessed March 3, 2015.

      [9] INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative (2014) Predatory Publishing: What every editor needs to know. Nurse Author & Editor, 24(3), 1.

      [10] Kaiser J (2010) free journals grow amid ongoing debate. Science, 329(5994), 896-898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5994.896.

      [11] Kurata K, Morioka T, Yokoi K, & Matsubayashi M (2013) Remarkable Growth of Open Access in the Biomedical Field: Analysis of PubMed Articles from 2006 to 2010. PLoS One, 8(5), e60925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060925.

      [12] Liesengang TJ (2013) The Continued Movement for Open Access to Peer-Reviewed Literature. American Journal of Opthamology, 156, 423-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.033.

      [13] Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Giggleman M, & Cruz R (2010) Correlates among cognitive beliefs, EBP implementation, organizational culture, cohesion and job satisfaction in evidence-based practice mentors from a community hospital system. Nursing Outlook, 58(6), 301-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2010.06.002.

      [14] National League for Nursing Position Statement (2008) preparing the next generation of nurses to practice in a technology-rich environment: An informatics agenda. Available at: www.nln.org/aboutnln/positionstatements/informatics_052808.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2015.

      [15] National Research Council Canada (2009) PubMed Central Canada: Making Canadian health research accessible to all. Available at: http://cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/services/cisti/pubmed-central-canada/index.html. Accessed March 5, 2015.

      [16] Nature Publishing Group (2014) Available at: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/about/index.html . Accessed January 30, 2015.

      [17] Nick JM (2011) Open Access Part I: The Movement, the Issues, and the Benefits. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17(1), doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol17No01PPT02.

      [18] Nick JM (2013, August 6) Reply by author to Guild on "Open Access Part I: The Movement, The Issues, and the Benefits" and "Open Access Part II: The Structure, Resources, and Implications for Nurses". Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(3).

      [19] NIH Public Access Policy (2008) Division G, Title II, Section 218 of PL 110-161 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008). Available at: Available at: http://publicaccess.nih.gov/policy.htm. Accessed March 15, 2015.

      [20] Research Information Network (2013) Finch Report: Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings – the Finch Group. Available at: http://www.researchinfonet.org/publish/finch/. Accessed March 7, 2015.

      [21] Sheets W (2014, May 14) Understanding Orthography and its Implications for English Language Learners. Available at: http://lcosu.blogspot.com/2012/04/understanding-orthography-and.html. Accessed March 7, 2015.

      [22] Solomon DJ & Björk B (2012) a study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485-1495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22673.

      [23] Wellcome Trust (2013, October) Open Access Policy: Position statement in support of open and unrestricted access to published research. Available at: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Policy-and-position-statements/WTD002766.htm. Accessed February 28, 2015.

      [24] Wolrabe K & Birkmeier D (2014, June 28) does open access articles in Economics offer a citation advantage? MPRA Paper No. 56842. Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/56842/. Accessed March 17, 2015.

      [25] World Health Organization (2014) WHO’s vision for information sharing. Available at: www.who.int/about/who_reform/change_at_who/issue4/information-sharing/en/index.html. Accessed February 27, 2015.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Nick, J. M. (2015). Globalizing nursing science: analysis of nursing’s participation in the open access movement from 1993 to 2014. International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies, 4(2), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijans.v4i2.4538

    Received date: 2015-03-26

    Accepted date: 2015-06-08

    Published date: 2015-06-18