Prevalence of subclinical mastitis and its association with bacteria and risk factors in lactating cows of Barisal district in Bangladesh

  • Authors

    • Mohammad Kayesh Patuakhali Science and Technology University
    • Milton Talukder Patuakhali Science and Technology University
    • AKM Anower Patuakhali Science and Technology University
    2014-06-18
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v2i2.2835
  • The subclinical mastitis is more serious and is responsible for much greater loss to the dairy industry in Bangladesh. This study was per-formed to determine the prevalence of bovine subclinical mastitis and to isolate and identify the bacterial agents and risk factors associated with subclinical mastitis in randomly selected 200 lactating cows (147 local zebu and 53 crossbreds) of Barisal district in Bangladesh. California Mastitis Test (CMT) was performed on each quarter sample of lactating cows at field condition for determination of subclinical mastitis. Out of 200 lactating cows, 57 were found to be positive for subclinical mastitis by CMT. Out of 57 CMT positive cows, only 15 cows showed strong positive reactions and these samples were used for bacteriological culture to isolate and identify bacterial agents. The overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis was 28.50%. The prevalence of subclinical mastitis was significantly high in crossbreds (45.28%) compared to local zebu (22.45%) (p < 0.05). Based on CMT results of quarters, prevalence of subclinical mastitis was 40.57% (n=212) in crossbreds and 20.92% (n=588) in local zebu cows. The prevalence was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in cows with a daily milk yield of 3-5L and 5-7L. The highest prevalence found in mid lactation was 32.50% and the highest prevalence in the age group of 7 to 9 years was 37.50%. The prevalence of subclinical mastitis was comparatively higher (32.69%) in lactating cows where housed with earthen floor compared to concrete floor (23.17%). Among the pathogens isolated from the strongly positive subclinical mastitis samples, the most frequent bacteria were Staphylococcus spp. (73.33%). For early detection of subclinical mastitis, CMT can be performed regularly as a control measure and emphasis should be given on farm management practices, particularly on milking procedure and udder sanitation.

    Keywords: Bacteria, CMT, Prevalence, Risk factors, Subclinical mastitis.

  • References

    1. Bitew M, Tafere A & Tolosa T (2010), Study on bovine mastitis in dairy farms of Bahir Dar and its environs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9, 2912-2917.
    2. Bradley A (2002), Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease. Veteri-nary Journal 164, 116-128.
    3. Cheesbrough M (1985), Medical laboratory manual for tropical countries. Vol. II: Microbiology, pp: 400-480.
    4. Dangore AD, Bhalerao DP, Jagadish S, Keskar DV & Sharma LK (2000), Evaluation of some byre-side tests in bovine sub-clinical mastitis. Indian Veterinary Journal 77, 380-381.
    5. Devi BK, Shukla PC & Bagherwal RK (1997), Incidence of sub-clinical mastitis in cows. Indian Journal Dairy Science 50, 477-478.
    6. Du Preeze JH (2000), Bovine mastitis therapy and why it fails. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 71, 201-208.
    7. Fox LK (2009), Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of heifer mastitis. Veterinary Microbiology 134, 82- 88.
    8. Ghosh CP, Nagpaul PK & Prasad S (2004), Factors affecting sub-clinical mastitis in Sahiwal cows. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 57, 127-131.
    9. Islam MA, Islam MZ, Islam MA, Rahman MS & Islam MT (2011), Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in selected areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine 9, 73–78.
    10. Kader MA, Samad MA & Saha S (2003), Influence of host level factors on prevalence and economics of sub-clinical mastitis in dairy cows in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 56, 235-240.
    11. Kader MA, Samad MA, Saha S & Taleb MA (2002), Prevalence and aetiology of sub-clinical mastitis with antibiotic sensitivity to isolated organisms among milch cows in Bangla-desh. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 55, 218-223.
    12. Madut NA, Godir AEA & El Jalil IM (2009), Host deter-minants of bovine mastitis in semi-intensive production system of Kharfoum State, Sudan. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 3, 71-77.
    13. Merchant IA & Packer RA (1967), Veterinary Bacteriology and Virology. 7th Edn, the Iowa University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, pp: 286-306.
    14. Prodhan MAM, Kamal AHM & Mahbub-E-Elahi ATM (1996), Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in cows of Baghabari Milkshed area. Bangladesh Veterinary Journal 30, 59 – 61.
    15. Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B & Carter GR (2004), Clincal Veterinary Microbiology. Mosby Publishing, London, pp: 43-55, 327-344.
    16. Radostis OM, Gay CC, Blood DC & Hinchcliff KW (2000), Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the diseases of cattle, sheep, pigs, goats and horses. 9th Edn. WB Saunders Company Ltd. Philadelphia, pp: 603-700.
    17. Radostis OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW & Constable D (2007), Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs and Goats. 10th Edn, Grafos, S.A. Arte Sobre Papel, Spain, pp: 823-835.
    18. Rahman MS, Nooruddin M & Rahman MM (1997), Prev-alence and distribution of mastitis in cross-bred and exotic dairy cows. Bangladesh Veterinary Journal 14, 1-4.
    19. Rasool G, Jabbar MA, Kazmi SE & Ahmed A (1985), Incidence of sub-clinical mastitis in Nilli-Ravi buffaloes and Sahiwal cows. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 5, 76-78.
    20. Rosenberger G (1979), Clinical examination of cattle. 1st Edn, Verlag, Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany, pp. 215-220.
    21. Sachin J & Suresh G (2006), Status of mastitis as an emerging disease in improved and periurban dairy farms in India. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1081, 74-83.
    22. Schultz LH, Broom RW, Jasper DE, Berger RWM, Natwke RP, Philpot WN, Smith JW & Thompson PD (1978), Current Concepts of Bovine Mastitis. 2nd Edn., National Mastitis Council, Washington, DC, USA, pp: 6-9.
    23. Seegers H, Fourichon C & Beaudeau F (2003), Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research 34, 475-491.
    24. Singh KB & Baxi KK (1988), Studies on the incidence and diagnosis of sub-clinical mastitis in milch animals. Indian Veterinary Journal 47, 723-729.
    25. Singh PJ & Sing KR (1994), a study of economic losses due to mastitis in India. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 47, 265-272.
    26. Sumathi BR, Veeregowda BM & Amitha R (2008), Prevalence and antibiogram profiles of bacterial isolates from clinical bovine mastitis. Veterinary World 1, 237-238.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Kayesh, M., Talukder, M., & Anower, A. (2014). Prevalence of subclinical mastitis and its association with bacteria and risk factors in lactating cows of Barisal district in Bangladesh. International Journal of Biological Research, 2(2), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v2i2.2835