A comparative evaluation of the inulin utilization potential of two Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains for the development of a synbiotic powder

  • Authors

    • LIGIMOL JAMES Department of Dairy Microbiology, College of Dairy Science and Technology, Mannuthy, thrissur
    • Anil K. Puniya
    • Kishan Singh
    2014-09-16
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v2i2.3314

  • Abstract

    Assessment of the compatibility between the probiotic and prebiotic is identified as a critical step while developing synbiotic products. So a study was conducted to compare the inulin utilization potential of two Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains for selecting a strain for the development of a lyophilized synbiotic product. The growth stimulatory effect of inulin was found to be more prominent on Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis B420 than on Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12. So a synbiotic pair of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis B420 and inulin was selected for the development of the synbiotic product. The developed product had a high probiotic count of  6.5x108 cfu/g, showing a survival rate of 65%. On assessing the probiotic count of the developed product during storage, a marked reduction was observed on room temperature storage with the counts reducing to the level of less than five log cfu/g after 60 days. In contrast the count remained in the range of eight to nine log cfu/g even after 60 days of refrigerated storage. So it could be a suggested that considering the probiotic stability and viability problems pertaining to fermented dairy products, lyophilized products could be potential alternatives as matrices for the delivery of probiotics to humans.

    Keywords: Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis B420, Inulin, Lyophilized powder, Synbiotics.

  • References

    1. Ananta E, Volkert M & Knorr D (2005) Cellular injuries and storage stability of spray-dried Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. International Dairy Journal 15, 399-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.08.004.
    2. Arroyo, L, Cotton LN & Martin JH (1994) Evaluation of media for enumeration of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, B. infantis and B. longum from pure culture. Cultured Dairy products Journal 29, 20-21, and 23-24.
    3. Bielecka M, Biedrycka E & Majkowska A (2002) Selection of probiotics and prebiotics for synbiotics and confirmation of their in vivo effectiveness. Food Research International 35, 125-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969 (01)00173-9.
    4. Capela P, Hay TKC & Shah NP (2006) Effect of cryoprotectants, prebiotics and microencapsulation on survival of probiotic organisms in yoghurt and freeze-dried yoghurt. Food Research International 39, 203-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.07.007.
    5. Collins EB & Hall BJ (1984) Growth of bifidobacteria in milk and preparation of Bifidobacterium infantis for a dietary adjunct. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 1376-1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (84)81451-4.
    6. Corcoran BM, Stanton C, Fitzgerald, GF & Ross RP (2005) Survival of probiotic lactobacilli in acidic environments is enhanced in the presence of metabolizable sugars. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71, 3060–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.6.3060-3067.2005.
    7. Desmond C, Ross RP, O'Callaghan E, Fitzgerald G & Stanton C (2002) Improved survival of Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 in spray-dried powders containing gum acacia. Journal of Applied Microbiology 93, 1003–1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01782.x.
    8. Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Scott KP & Louis P (2007) Interactions and competition within the microbial community of the human colon: links between diet and health. Environmental Microbiology 9, 1101–1111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01281.x.
    9. Gardiner GE, Bouchier P, O'Sullivan E, Kelly J, Collins JK, Fitzgerald G, Ross RP & Stanton C (2002) A spray-dried culture for probiotic Cheddar cheese manufacture. International Dairy Journal 12, 749–756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946 (02)00072-9.
    10. Granato D, Branco GF, Nazzaro F, Cruz AG & Faria JAF (2010) Functional Foods and Nondairy Probiotic Food Development: Trends, Concepts, and Products. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety 9,293-302.
    11. Janer C, Rohr LM, Pelaez C, Laloi M, Cleusix, V, Requena T & Meile L (2004) Hydrolysis of oligofructoses by the recombinant β-fructofuranosidase from Bifidobacterium lactis. Systmatic and Applied Microbiology 27,279–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0723-2020-00274.
    12. Lamoureux L, Roy D & Gauthier SF (2002) Production of oligosaccharides in yogurt containing bifidobacteria and yogurt cultures, Journal of Dairy Science 5, 1058–1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74166-0
    13. Leja K, Dembczyński R, Białas W& Jankowski T (2009) Production of dry Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG preparations by spray drying and lyophilization in aqueous two-phase systems. ACTA Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria 8, 39-49.
    14. Ma¨tto J, Malinen E, Suihko ML, Alander M, Palva A&Saarela M. (2004) Genetic heterogeneity and technological properties of intestinal bifidobacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology 97, 459–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02340.x.
    15. Palaria A, Johnson-Kanda I& O'Sullivan D J (2012) Effect of a Synbiotic Yogurt on Levels of Fecal Bifidobacteria, Clostridia, and Enterobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78, 933-940. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05848-11.
    16. Rasic J (1990) Culture media for detection and enumeration of the bifidobacteria in fermented milk products. Bull.etin of the International Dairy Federation 252, 24-31.
    17. Rossi M, Corradini C, Amaretti A, Nicolini M, Pompei A, Zanoni S & Matteuzzi D (2005) Fermentation of fructooligosaccharides and inulin by bifidobacteria: a comparative study of pure and fecal cultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71, 6150–6158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.10.6150-6158.2005.
    18. Roy D, Mainville I & Mondou F (1997) Bifidobacteria and their role in yogurt-related product. Microecology and Therapy 26, 167–180.
    19. Saulnier DMA, Gibson GR& Kolida S (2008) In vitro effects of selected synbiotics on the faecal microbiota composition. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 66, 516-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00561.x
    20. Schrezenmeir J & de Vrese M (2001) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics approaching a definition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73(suppl), 361S–4S.
    21. Shah NP (2001) Functional Foods from probiotics and prebiotics. Food Technology 55, 46-53.
    22. Silva IS, Barbosa FH, Duarte R, Vieira LQ, Arantes RM & Nicoli JR (2004) Effect of Bifidobacterium longum ingestion on experimental salmonellosis in mice, Journal of Applied Microbiology 97, 29–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02265.x.
    23. Wang Y, Yu C & Chou C (2004) Viability of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria in fermented soymilk after drying, subsequent rehydration and storage. International Journal of Food Microbiology 93, 209-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.12.001.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    JAMES, L., Puniya, A. K., & Singh, K. (2014). A comparative evaluation of the inulin utilization potential of two Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains for the development of a synbiotic powder. International Journal of Biological Research, 2(2), 121-124. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v2i2.3314

    Received date: 2014-08-04

    Accepted date: 2014-09-06

    Published date: 2014-09-16