Multidrug resistant Salmonella sp isolated from chicken

  • Authors

    • Atere Victor Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, P. M. B. 5363, Ado-Ekiti,Nigeria
    2016-04-29
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v4i1.6030
  • Salmonella, Poultry Feed, Resistance, Salmonellosis.
  • Antibiotic resistance has been a major problem in combatting Salmonella in poultry, this research was designed to determine the antibiotic resistance level of Salmonella isolated from freshly dead chicken. A total of 107 freshly dead chicken were collected from 23 different farms, birds were necropsied, liver and trachea were collected, Salmonella were recovered from the samples using peptone water, Rappaport-Vassiliadis R10 Broth and Salmonella-Shigella agar. Pure culture were identified using cultural, morphological and biochemical characteristics. The pure isolates were subjected to antibiotic test using disc diffusion method. Sixteen isolates of Salmonella were recovered, 3 of which were from the trachea while 13 were recovered from the liver. All of the Salmonella isolates were resistant to Amoxicillin 100% while Nitrofuratoin was least resisted with only 37.5% of the Salmonella isolates showing resistance. The antibiotic resistant pattern often observed in this study were AMP, AUG, TLY with 75% (12); AMP, AUG, TLY, CPR, ENR, 50% (8); while 6.3% (1) was resistant to all of the antibiotics tested. This result showed that there is an emergence of multi-resistance Salmonella in poultry, therefore it is important to carry out sensitivity test before administration of antibiotics in order to control poultry salmonellosis.

  • References

    1. Amand, J. A., Otto, S. J., Cassis, R., Annett-Christianson, C. (2013). Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enteric serovar Heidelberg isolated from poultry in Alberta. Avian Pathology. 42(4): 379-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2013.811465.
    2. Arsenault J, Letellier A, Quessy S, Morin J, Boulianne M. (2007). Prevalence and Risk Factors for Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. Carcass Contamination in Turkeys Slaughtered in Quebec, Canada. Journal of Food Protection. 70 (6): 1350-1359.
    3. Atere, V. A, Bamikole, A. M. and Ajurojo, O. A. (2015a). Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacteria Isolated from Poultry Feeds Sold in Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. Journal of Advancement in Medical and Life Sciences V3I2. DOI: 10.15297/JALS.V3I2.06.
    4. Atere, V. A., Bamikole, A. M., Ajurojo, O. A. and Alo, O. S. (2015b). Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Pathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Chicken Liver and Trachea. Journal of Advancement in Medical and Life Sciences. V3I3. DOI: 10.15297/JALS.V3I3.02
    5. Dashe, Y. D., Raji, M. A., Abdu, P. A., Oladele, B. S. and Sugun, M. Y. (2013). Multidrug Resistant Pasteurella multocida Strains Isolated from Chickens with Cases of Fowl Cholera in Jos, Nigeria. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 12 (10): 596-600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.596.600.
    6. Harts CA, Kariuki S. (1998) Antimicrobial resistance in devel-oping countries. Biomedical Journal, 37:647-650.
    7. Helmuth, R. and Hensel, A. (2004). Towards the rational use of antibiotics: results of the first international symposium on the risk analysis of antibiotic resistance. J. Vet. Med. 51: 357-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00778.x.
    8. Hernandez, T., Sierra, A., Rodrigue-Alvarez, C., Torres, A., Arevalo, M.P., Calvo, M. and Arias, A (2005). Salmonella enteric serotypes isolated from imported frozen chicken meat in the Canary Islands. J Food Prot., 68(12):2702-2706.
    9. Johnston, A. M. (2001). Animals and antibiotics. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 18:291-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00379-X.
    10. Jung, H., Lee, S., Kim, Ch., Sunwoo, S., Lyoo, Y. S. (2011). Serovars distribution and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella spp. isolated from the swine farms and slaughter houses. Korean J. Vet. Res. 51(2): 123-128.
    11. McEwen, S. A. and Fedorka-Cray, P. J. (2002). Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:93-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/340246.
    12. Mohammad, J., Ahmad, R. and Mohsen, N. (2012). A study on bacterial flora and antibacterial resistance of yolk sac infection in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Comp. Clin. Pathol. 80: (12) 1459-69.
    13. Nchawa, Y. Y and Bassey, E. B (2015), Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Salmonella Species from Sources in Poultry Production Settings in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. American Journal of Health Research 3(2): 76-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20150302.14.
    14. Oluyege, J.O and .Oyinloye, I.A. (2013) Incidence of multiple antibiotic resistance among Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry droppings and cow dung in Ado-Ekiti metropolis Researcher; 5(9) 32-36. http://www.sciencepub.net/researcher
    15. Ramya, P., Madhavarao, T. and Rao, L. V. (2012). Study on the incidence of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry and meat samples by cultural and PCR methods. Vet World, 5(9): 541-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.541-545.
    16. Roy, P., Purushothaman, V., Koteeswaran, A. and. Dhillon, A. S. (2006). Isolation, Characterization and Antimicrobial Drug Resistance Pattern of Escherichia coli Isolated from Japanese quail and their Environment. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:442–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.3.442.
    17. Tabatabaeci, R. R. and Nasirian, A. (2003). Isolation, identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns of E. coli isolated from chicken flocks. Iranian J. Pharm. Therafoen-lizion. 2:39–42.
    18. Van-den Bogaard, A. E., London, N. and Stobberingh, E. E. (2000). Antimicrobial resistance in pig faecal samples from The Netherlands (five abattoirs) and Sweden. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45: 663-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/45.5.663.
    19. Witte, W. (2000). Selective pressure by antibiotic use in live-stock. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 16:S19–S24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00301-0.
  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Victor, A. (2016). Multidrug resistant Salmonella sp isolated from chicken. International Journal of Biological Research, 4(1), 64-66. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v4i1.6030