Failures and reoperation in fixed prosthesis -Systematic Review-

  • Authors

    • CHAFII Amine University Hassan II casablanca
    • MOUHIBI Abdallah University Hassan II casablanca
    • ANDOH Abderrhman University Hassan II casablanca
    2021-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijdr.v8i2.31670
  • Failure, Reoperation, fixed prosthesis, prosthodontic, systematic review, restoration. .

  • Abstract

    Our systematic review is made in view of the absence of studies dealing with failures and reoperations which encompassed all types of dento-supported fixed prosthetic restorations and aims to study prosthetic failures that could be encountered in fixed dento-supported prosthesis and the solutions to remedy

    Over the past two centuries, considerable progress has been made under the leadership of many scientists who have developed materials and techniques, with the aim of improving the quality of care and improving ergonomics.

    In short, in fixed prosthesis, failures have particularly serious consequences and can occur at all levels involved for these restorations. They can happen at any time.

    This is how we were able to note the influence of certaine variable on the success and durability of the treatments, which did not depend only on the skill and precision used during prosthetic development, such as the location, arch, preparation design, number of abutments, type of material used, bonding material, surface treatment and technologies used.

    So the choice of restorative materials was a decisive factor that had to be the result of a careful study of the different materials available depending on the clinical situation, in order to increase their longevity and therefore reduce the risk of failure.

     

     

     


  • References

    1. [1] AFRASHTEHFAR KI, EMAMI E, AHMADI M, ABI-NADER S, TAMIMI F. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2017, 117(5):345-53, 353.e1-353.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.003.

      [2] AHRBERG D, LAUER HC, AHRBERG M, WEIGL P. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016, vol 20(2), p.291-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6.

      [3] BALASUBRAMANIAM GR. Predictability of resin bonded bridges - a systematic review. Br Dent J. 2017, vol 222(11), p. 849-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.497.

      [4] BERGOLI CD, BRONDANI LP, WANDSCHER VF, PEREIRA GKR, CENCI MS, PEREIRA-CENCI T, VALANDRO LF. A multicenter randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial of fiber post cementation strategies. Oper Dent. 2018, 43-2, 128-135. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-278-C.

      [5] BEUER F, SCHWEIGER J, EICHBERGER M, KAPPERT HF, GERNET W, EDELHOFF D. High-strenght CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings – a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2009, vol 25, p. 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.019.

      [6] BLUM IR, JAGGER DC, WILSON NHF. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? part 2: all–ceramics and porcelain fused to metal systems. Dental Update. 2011, vol 38(3), p. 150–158. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2011.38.3.150.

      [7] BOLLA M, MULLER-BOLLA M, BORG C, LUPI-PEGURIER L, LAPLANCHE O, LEFORESTIER E. Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013. CD004623.

      [8] BRAWEK PK, WOLFART S, ENDRES L, KRISTEN A, REICH S. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow – the comparison of two systems.Clin Oral Investig. 2013, vol 17(9), p. 2119-2125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0923-5.

      [9] BUCHI DL, EBLER S, HAMMERLE CH, SAILER I. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study. Quintessence Int. 2014, vol 45(10), p. 837-846.

      [10] CHEN J, CAI H, SUO L, XUE Y, WANG J, WAN Q. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2017, vol 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.006.

      [11] CHO HY, WON HY, CHOE HC, SON MK. Fracture characteristics of dental ceramic crown according to zirconia coping design. Procedia Engineering. 2011, vol. 10, p. 1561-1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.261.

      [12] CLOET E, DEBELS E, NAERT I. Controlled clinical trial on the outcome of glass fiber composite cores versus wrought posts and cast cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a 5-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont. 2017, vol 30(1), p. 71-79. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4861.

      [13] COTERT S, OZTURK B. Posterior bridges retained by resin-bonded cast metal inlay retainers: a report of 60 cases followed for 6 years. J Oral Rehabil. 1997, vol 24, p. 697-704. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00548.x.

      [14] CREUGERS NH, KAYSER AF, VAN’T HOF MA. A seven and a half year survival study of resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res. 1992, vol 17(11), p. 1822-1825. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710111101.

      [15] DECUP FRANCK. Protocoles de réparation en dentisterie esthétiques. Réal Clin. 2000, vol 11(3), p. 263-275.

      [16] DUREY KA, NIXON PJ, ROBINSON S, CHAN MF. Resin bonded bridges: techniques for success. Br Dent J. 2011, vol 211, p. 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.619.

      [17] FERRARI M, CAGIDIACO MC, GORACCI C, ET AL. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2007, vol 22, p. 287-291.

      [18] FERRARI M, VICHI A, FADDA GM, ET AL. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res. 2012;91:72S-78S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512447949.

      [19] FERRARI M, VICHI A, GARCIA-GODOY F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000, vol 13, p. 15B-18B.

      [20] FEDOROWICZ Z, CARTER B, DE SOUZA RF, DE ANDRADE LIMA CHAVES C, NASSER M, SEQUEIRA-BYRON P. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013; 5:CD009109. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub2

      [21] FIGUEIRIDO FE, MARTINS-FILHO PR, FARI ES. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015, vol 41, p. 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.006.

      [22] GALIATSATOS AA. An indirect repair technique for fractured metal-ceramic restorations: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2005, vol 93(4), p. 321–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.018.

      [23] GRESNIGT MMM, CUNE MS, JANSEN K, VAN DER MADE SAM, OZCAN M. Randomized clinical trial on indirect resin composite and ceramic laminate veneers: Up to 10-year findings. J Dent. 2019, vol. 86, p. 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.06.001.

      [24] GRESNIGT MMM, KALK W, OZCAN M. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow up. J Adhes Dent. 2013, vol 15, p. 181-190.

      [25] HEINTZE SD, ROUSSON V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010, vol 23(6), p. 493-502

      [26] HEYDECKE G, PETERS MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002, vol 87, p. 380-386. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123848.

      [27] IBBESTON R. Clinical considerations for adhesive bridge-work. Dent Update. 2004, vol 31, p. 254-260. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2004.31.5.254.

      [28] KASSARDIJIAN V, VARMA S, ANDIAPPAN M, CREUGERS NH, BARTLETT D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the longevity of anterior and posterior all-ceramic crowns. J Dent. 2016, vol 55, p. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.009.

      [29] KERN M. Clinical long-term survival of two-retainer and single-retainer all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 2005, vol 36, p. 141-147.

      [30] KIMMICH M, STAPPERT CFJ. Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2013, vol 144(1), p. 31-44. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0011.

      [31] KOENIG V, VANHEUSDEN AJ, LE GOFF SO, MAINJOT AK. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study. J Dent. 2013, vol 41, p. 1164-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.009.

      [32] KRAMER N, KUNZELMANN KH, TASCHNER M, MEHL A, GARCIA-GODOY F, FRANKENBERGER R. Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays. J Dent Res. 2006, vol 85, p. 1097-1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501206.

      [33] MAROULAKOS G, THOMPSON GA, KONTOGIORGOS ED. Effect of cement type on the clinical performance and complications of zirconia and lithium disilicate tooth-supported crowns: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018, vol 121(5), p. 754-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.011.

      [34] MOHER D, LIBERATI A, TETZLAFF J, ALTMAN DG; THE PRISMA GROUP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21; 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

      [35] MURAD MH, ASI N, ALSAWAS M, ALAHDAB ET AL. New evidence pyramid. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2016, vol 21, p. 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401.

      [36] PANG Z, CHUGHTAI A, SAILER I, ZHANG Y. A fractographic study of clinically retrieved zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater. 2015, vol 31(10), p. 1198-1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.003.

      [37] PAPADIOCHOU S, PISSIOTIS AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: a systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018, vol 119, p. 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.001.

      [38] PJETURSSON BE, SAILER I, MAKAROV NA, ZWAHLEN M, THOMA DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater. 2015, vol 31(6), p. 624-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.013.

      [39] PJETURSSON BE, SAILER I, MAKAROV NA, ZWAHLEN M, THOMA DS. Corrigendum to ‘’All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs’’ [Dental Materials 31 (6) (2015) 624-639]. Dent Mater. 2017, vol 33(1): e48-e51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.033.

      [40] PJETURSSON BE, TAN WC, TAN K, BRAGGER U, ZWAHLEN M, LANG NP, A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002, vol 19, p. 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01527.x.

      [41] RAIGRODSKI AJ, YU A, CHICHE GJ, HOCHSTEDLER JL, MANCL LA, MOHAMED SE. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2012, vol 108(4), p. 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60165-6.

      [42] RODRIGUES SB, FRANKEN P, CELESTE RK, LEITUNE VCB, COLLARES FM. CAD/CAM or conventional ceramic materials restorations longevity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2019, vol. 63(4), p. 389-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.11.006.

      [43] SAILER I, BALMER M, HUSLER J, HAMMERLE CHF, KANEL S, THOMA DS. 10-year randomized trial (RCT) of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2018, vol. 76, p. 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.015.

      [44] SAILER I, GOTTNERB J, KANELB S, HAMMERLE CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont. 2009, vol 22, p. 553-560.

      [45] SAILER I, MAKAROV NA, THOMA DS, ZWAHLEN M, PJETURSSON BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015, vol 31(6), p. 603-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011.

      [46] SAILER I, MAKAROV NA, THOMA DS, ZWAHLEN M, PJETURSSON BE. Corrigendum to ‘’All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs)’’ [Dental Materials 31 (6) (2015) 603-623]. Dent Mater. 2016, vol 32(12): e389-e390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.032.

      [47] SALMI LR. Lecture critique et communication médicale scientifique. Comment lire, présenter, rédiger et publier une étude clinique ou épidémiologique. 3e édition. Issy-les-Moulineaux (France) : Elsevier Masson ; 2012.

      [48] SARKIS-ONFORE R, JACINTO R, BOSCATO N, CENCI MS, PEREIRA-CENCI T. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J Dent. 2014, vol. 42(5), p. 582-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.003.

      [49] SCHLEY JS, HEUSSEN N, REICH S, FISCHER J, HASELHUHN K, WOLFART S. Survival probability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses up to 5 yr: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010, vol 118(5), p. 443-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00767.x.

      [50] SKUPIEN JA, CENCI MS, OPDAM NJ, KREULEN CM, HUYSMANS MC, PEREIRA-CENCI T. Crown vs composite for post-retained restorations: an up to 5 years RCT. J Dent. 2016, vol 48(6), p. 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.007.

      [51] SOARES LM, SOARES C, MIRANDA ME, BASTING RT. Influence of Core-Veneer thickness ratio on the fracture load and failure mode of zirconia crowns. J Prosthodont. 2019, vol 28(2), p. 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12601.

      [52] STEFANESCU C, IONITA C, NECHITA V, DRAFTA S, OANCEA L, PETRE A. Survival Rates and Complications for Zirconia-Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in a Period up to 10 Years: A Systematic Review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018, vol 26(2), p. 54-61.

      [53] SWAIN MV. Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures. Acta Biomater. 2009, vol 5, p. 1668-1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.12.016.

      [54] THOMA DS, SAILER I, IOANNIDIS A, ZWAHLEN M, MAKAROV N, PJETURSSON BE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017, vol 28(11), p. 1421-1432. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13007.

      [55] TORBJORNER A, FRANSSON B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2004, vol 17, p. 369-376.

      [56] WYATT CC. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: what’s new? J Can Dent Assoc. 2007, vol 73, p. 933-938.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Amine, C., Abdallah, M., & Abderrhman, A. (2021). Failures and reoperation in fixed prosthesis -Systematic Review-. International Journal of Dental Research, 8(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijdr.v8i2.31670

    Received date: 2021-07-05

    Accepted date: 2021-08-11

    Published date: 2021-08-24