A comparative finite element study of stress and deformation on three commonly used all ceramic fixed denture prosthesis under the influence of different bite forces

  • Authors

    • Rohit Raghavan Proessor & HOD, Dept. of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Royal Dental College, Palakkad, Kerala, India.
    • Jency S Raj Post-Graduate student, Dept. of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Royal Dental College, Palakkad, Kerala, India.
    • Shiji M Kunjappan Reader, Dept. of Orthodontics, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, Selam, Tamil Nadu, India
    • Kiran Christopher Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Toc H Institute of Science and Technology, Arakkunnam, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
    • Sapna C Kambiranda Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Prosthodontics, Coorg Institute of Dental Science, India
  • Fixed Partial Denture, Masticatory Loads, Finite Element Method, Monoblock
  • Aim: To simplify the complexity in design, modeling and analysis of Fixed Partial Dentures (FPD) and to evaluate the maximum stress and deformation developed using Finite-Element Method.

    Materials and Methods: The specimen was created based on monoblock concept. The monoblock concept assumes that the total FPD unit, i.e., Abutment, pontic, connector and retainer together will act as a single unit. Monoblock castings do not differ from those made in segments and later welded as regard to the distribution of stresses. The Specimen of dimension 30 X 5 X 5mm were made of the three commonly used FPD materials such as feldspathic ceramics, Lithium di silicate and Zirconia. Rectangle shape was considered with notches at 1 X 450 as a close approximation of actual FPDs. The modeling was done using Solid Works 2012, and analysis was carried out using ANSYS Mechanical APDL R14.5. The maximum stress and deformations corresponding to various masticatory loads (100 N, 500 N, 600N, 800 N & 1000 N) were found out, and the results were compared with previous studies in FPD.

    Results: The results revealed that the maximum principal stress and deformation are found at the centre of the pontic. Furthermore, it was found that for all masticatory loads, the maximum stress and deformation were encountered in Feldspathic ceramic and least for Zirconia.

    Conclusion: A less complex model using the monoblock concept was developed to design and analyze FPD, so that the meshing complexities, computational time and cost can be reduced drastically. The results could well be considered as a benchmark in FPD-related studies.

  • References

    1. [1] Fradeani Mauro, Aquilano Augusto, Bassein Leona (1997) Longitudinal Study of Pressed Glass-Ceramic Inlays for Four and a Half Years. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 78 (4) 346-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70041-6.

      [2] Edelhoff D, Spiekermann H, Yildirim M (2001) Metal-Free Inlay-Retained Fixed Partial Dentures. Quintessence International, 32(4), 269-281.

      [3] Wolfart Stefan, Kern M (2006) A New Design For All-Ceramic Inlayretained Fixed Partial Dentures: A Report of 2 Cases. Quitessence International, 37 (1), 27-33.

      [4] Chen J, Xu L (1994) A Finite Element Analysis of the Human Temporomandibular Joint. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 116 (4), 401-407. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2895790.

      [5] Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D and Apicella A (2005) 3D FEA of Cemented Steel, Glass and Carbon Posts in a Maxillary Incisor. Dental Materials, 21 (8), 709-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.010.

      [6] Oguz Eraslan, Ozgur Inan, Asli Secilmis (2010) The Effect of Framework Design on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported FPDs: A 3-D FEM Study. European Journal of Dentistry, 4, 374-382.

      [7] Andréa Barreira Motta, Luiz Carlos Pereira, Andréia R C C da Cunha, Fernando Pereira Duda (2008) The Influence of the Loading Mode on the Stress Distribution on the Connector Region of Metal-ceramic and All- ceramic Fixed Partial Denture. Artificial Organs, 32 (4), 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00544.x.

      [8] Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Bayne SC, Felton DA (1996) Stress Concentration in All-Ceramic Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures. Quintessence International, 27, 701-706.

      [9] Eraslan, M Sevimay, A Usumez, G Eskitascioglu (2005) Effects of Cantilever Design and Material on Stress Distribution in Fixed Partial Dentures – A Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 32, 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01429.x.

      [10] H Fischer, M Weber, M Eck, A Erdrich, R Marx (2004) Finite Element and Experimental Analyses of Polymer-Based Dental Bridges Reinforced by Ceramic Bars. Journal of Biomechanics, 37, 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.08.013.

      [11] Antonio Pérez-González, José L Iserte-Vilar, Carmen González-Lluch (2011) Interpreting Finite Element Results for Brittle Materials in Endodontic Restorations. BioMedical Engineering On-line.

      [12] Rajendra Karwa (2006) A Textbook of Machine Design. Laxmi Publications, 72-73.

      [13] De Groot R, Peters MC, De Haan YM, Dop GJ, Plasschaert AJ (1987) Failure Stress Criteria for Composite Resin. Journal of Dental Research, 66 (12), 1748-1752. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660121001.

      [14] Ichim I, Kuzmanovic DV, Love RM (2006) A Finite Element Analysis of Ferrule Design on Restoration Resistance and Distribution of Stress within a Root. International Endodontic Journal, 39 (6), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01085.x.

      [15] Nakamura T, Ohyama T, Waki T, Kinuta S, Wakabayashi K, Mutobe Y, Takano N, Yatani H (2006) Stress Analysis of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Different Types of Post Material. Dental Materials Journal, 25 (1), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.145.

      [16] Charlton DG, Roberts HW, Tiba A (2008) Measurement of Select Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3 Machinable Ceramic Materials. Quintessence International, 39(7), 573-579.

      [17] IM Low (2014) Advances in Ceramic Matrix Composites. Woodhead Publishing.

      [18] Li Ma, Petra C Guess and Yu Zhang (2013) Load-Bearing Properties of Minimal - Invasive Monolithic Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Occlusal Onlays: Finite Element and Theoretical Analyses. Dental Materials, 29, 742-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.004.

      [19] Saifang Huang, Peng Cao, Chenfei Wang, Zhaohui Huang, Wei Gao (2013) Fabrication of a High-Strength Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic In a Complex Glass System. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 1 (1), 46- 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jascer.2013.02.007.

      [20] RM Natal Jorge, JC Reis Campos, Mário AP Vaz, Sónia M Santos, João Manuel R S (2014) Biodental Engineering III. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 99.

      [21] Kelly JR (1995) Perspectives on Strength. Dental Materials, 2 (2), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80043-3.

      [22] Lundgren D, Laurell L (1984) Occlusal Forces in Prosthetically Restored Dentitions: A Methodological Study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 11, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1984.tb00549.x.

      [23] Serkan Saridag, Atilla Gokhan Ozyesill, Gurel Pekkan (2012) Fracture Strength and Bending of All Ceramic and Fiber-Reinforced Composites In Inlay-Retained Fixed Partial Dentures. Journal of Dental Sciences, 7, 159- 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.03.013.

      [24] Mansour Rismanchian, Soufia Shafiei, Amin Davoudi (2014) Flexural Strengths of Implant-Supported Zirconia Based Bridges in Posterior Regions. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 6(5), 346- 350. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.346.

      [25] F Gerami- Panah, S Mir M Rezaee, L Sedighpour, F Fahimi and H Ghodrati (2006) Effect of Taper on Stress Distribution of All Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures: A 3D- FEA Study. Journal of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Science, 2 (3), 109-114.

      [26] RD Lakshmi, A Abraham, V Sekar, A Hariharan (2015) Influence of Connector Dimensions on the Stress Distribution of Monolithic Zirconia and Lithium-Disilicate Inlay Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. Tanta Dental Journal, 12, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2015.01.001.

      [27] H Fischer, M Weber, R Marx (2003) Lifetime Prediction of All-ceramic Bridges by Computational Methods. Journal of Dental Research, 82 (3), 238-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200317.

      [28] Nils Goetzen, Gerd Natt, Michael M Morlock, Joachim Tinschert (2003) Numerical Stress and Reliability Analysis of All-Ceramic Fixed-Partial Dentures. Summer Bioengineering Conference, June 25-29, Sonesta Beach Resort in Key Biscayne, Florida.

      [29] Alvaro Della Bona, Marcia Borba, Paula Benetti, Yuanyuan Duan and Jason A Griggs (2013) Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modelling of All-Ceramic Restorations Based on Micro-CT. Journal of Dentistry, 41, 412 – 419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.014.

      [30] Paul H DeHoff, Kenneth J Anusavice, Nils Gotzen (2006) Viscoelastic Finite Element Analysis of an All-Ceramic Fixed Partial Denture. Journal of Biomechanics, 39, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.007.

      [31] Eraslan O, Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eskitascıoḡlu G (2005) Effects of Cantilever Design and Material on Stress Distribution In Fixed Partial Dentures - A Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 32(4), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01429.x.

      [32] Wen Kou, Decong Li, Jiyan Qiao, Li Chen, Yansheng Ding, Goran Sjogren (2011) A 3D numerical simulation of stress distribution and fracture process in a zirconia-based FPD framework. International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 96 (2), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31782.

      [33] Sepideh Mokhtarikhoee, Alireza Jannesari, Hamid Behroozi, Saeedeh Mokhtarikhoee (2008) Effect of Connector Width on Stress Distribution in All Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures (A 3D Finite Element Study). 30th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference, August 20-24, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

      [34] Andreia Barreira MOTTA, Luiz Carlos PEREIRA, Andreia RCC da CUNHA (2007) All Ceramic and Porcelain Fused to Metal Fixed Partial Dentures: A Comparative Study by 2D Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 15 (5), 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000500005.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Raghavan, R., S Raj, J., M Kunjappan, S., Christopher, K., & Kambiranda, S. C. (2017). A comparative finite element study of stress and deformation on three commonly used all ceramic fixed denture prosthesis under the influence of different bite forces. International Journal of Dental Research, 5(1), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijdr.v5i1.7356