Cross-Monotonic in Cost Sharing Mechanisms Using Ns2

Authors

  • R Ganesan

  • Justin Joseph

  • Jisha Isaac

Received date: April 6, 2018

Accepted date: April 6, 2018

Published date: March 10, 2018

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.4.11169

Keywords:

Cross-monotonic, Game Theory, Linear Programming, group strategy proofness

Abstract

A cost-sharing plan is an arrangement of guidelines characterizing how to distribute the cost among adjusted clients. A cost-sharing strategy is check monotonic in case it satisfies the property that everyone is in a flawless circumstance when the course of action of individuals who get the affiliation creates. CM is a property that passes on a customer's part ought to be more humble when balanced in a more imperative set. CM is an key techniques to achieve the group strategy proofness. By using the multicast plans that objective the enhanced directing, cross-monotonic cost sharing, and stabilize budget. Unsurprising degree cost recuperations is conceivable, and also apply a primal-twofold diagram to in the meantime create an organizing strategy and a cost-sharing course of action, and demonstrate that the subsequent instrument is collect framework proof and ensures off base cost recuperation against a flawless coordinating game plan.

 

 

References

  1. [1] Ahlswede.R, Cai.N, et.al,, “Network Information Flow,†IEEE Trans. Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 4,pp. 1204-121, 2000.

    [2] Brenner.J and Schafer.G (2009), “Cooperative Cost Sharing via Incremental Mechanisms,†Preprint 650, DFG Research Center Matheon, Germany, 2009.

    [3] Goemans.M.X and Williamson.D.P“A General Approximation Technique for Constrained Forest Problems,†Proc. ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms (SODA),2012.

    [4] Immorlica.N, Mahdian.M, andmirrokni.V.S (2005),†Limitations of Cross- Monotonic Cost Sharing Schemes,â€Proc. ACM- SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms (SODA).

    [5] Jain.K and Vazirani.V,â€Applications(2001) of Approximation Algorithms to Cooperative Games,â€Proc ACM Symp.Theory of Computing(STOC)

    [6] Konemann.J, Leonardi.S,(2005)and G. Schafer, “A Group-Strategyproof Mechanism for Steiner Forests,†Proc. ACM-SIAM Symp.Discrete Algorithms (SODA).

    [7] Li.Z,(2008),â€Cross-Monotonic Multicast,â€Proc.IEEE INFOCOM.

    [8] Mehta.A, Roughgarden.T, and Sundararajan.M(2009), “Beyond Moulin Mechanisms,†Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 67,no. 1, pp. 125-155

    [9] Moulin,(1999) “Incremental Cost Sharing:Characterization by Coalition Strategy- Proofnessâ€,Social Choice and Welfare,vol.16,pp.279-320

    [10] Moulin, H. Soc Choice Welfare (1999) 16: 279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050145

    [11] N. IMMORLICA, M. MAHDIAN, AND V. S. MIRROKNI, Limitations of crossmonotonic cost sharing schemes, in Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, ACM Press, 2005, pp. 602–611.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ganesan, R., Joseph, J., & Isaac, J. (2018). Cross-Monotonic in Cost Sharing Mechanisms Using Ns2. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2.4), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.4.11169

Received date: April 6, 2018

Accepted date: April 6, 2018

Published date: March 10, 2018