Retrospective observational study and comparative review of lymph node yield in open vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

  • Authors

    • MR. Ahmed Elamin Elsadig Abdalla SCF Colorectal and general surgery King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London,UK Clinical science institute,National university of Ireland,Galway, Ireland
    2020-12-26
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijm.v9i1.31237
  • Laparoscopic CRC surgery, open CRC surgery, lymph node yield and oncological relevance.

  • Laparoscopic surgery is standard treatment for colorectal cancer in the last decade of surgery’s history. Nowadays  open surgery for CRC indicated only for certain cases. with evolving of laparoscopic instruments and adoption of laparoscopic and robotic techniques by new generation of surgeons open surgery started to vanish gradually as standard care in all world well equipped hospitals and centers . Short and long term advantages of laparoscopic approach manifested in it is minimum invasive technique and less sequelae of wound healing respectively, but in CRC surgical procedures staging and eradication of neoplasm have great impact in survival and morbidity outcome. This study compare laparoscopic with open surgical technique for CRC using lymph node yield as oncological determinant factor for prognosis and need for further treatment.

     

     


     

  • References

    1. [1] Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Lymph Node Yield in Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study Elena Orsenigo,1 Giulia Gasparini,2 and Michele Carlucci1 1Department of General and Emergency Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy 2Vita-Salute San Raffaele University.

      [2] Lymph node yield, survival benefit, and safety of high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Si MB, et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019. Mou-Bo Si ,Pei-Jing ,YanZhen-Ying, DuLai-Yuan, LiHongWei Tian,Wen-Jie Jiang,Wu-Tang Jing,Jia Yang,Cai-Wen Han ,Xiu-E Shi.

      [3] Examinong the relationship between lymph node harvest and survival in patients undergoing

      [4] Colectomy for colon adenocarcinomal. Surgery. 2019.Maude Trepanier, MDa,b Arman Erkan, MDa Araz Kouyoumdjian,George Nassif, MDaMatthew Albert, MDa John Monson, MDa,Lawrence Lee, MD, PhDa,b, Published Online: August 06, 2019.

      [5] Meeting Presentation: This abstract was a poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, WA, June 10–14, 2017.

      [6] By Chong-Chi Chiu 1,2,3,Wen-Li Lin 4,Hon-Yi Shi 5,6,7,Chien-Cheng Huang 8,9,Jyh-Jou Chen 10,Shih-Bin Su 11,12,13,Chih-Cheng Lai 14,Chien-Ming Chao 14,Chao-Jung Tsao 15,Shang-Hung Chen 16 andJhi-Joung Wang 17,18,*.

      [7] Guo, D.Y.; Eteuati, J.; Nguyen, M.H.; Lloyd, D.; Ragg, J.L. Laparoscopic assisted colectomy: Experience from a rural centre. ANZ J. Surg. 2007, 77, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04034.x.

      [8] Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 2050–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032651.

      [9] Leung, K.L.; Kwok, S.P.; Lam, S.C.; Lee, J.F.; Yiu, R.Y.; Ng, S.S.; Lai, P.B.; Lau, W.Y. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: Prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004, 363, 1187–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3.

      [10] Guillou, P.J.; Quirke, P.; Thorpe, H.; Walker, J.; Jayne, D.G.; Smith, A.M.; Heath, R.M.; Brown, J.M.; MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopicassisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 365, 1718–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2.

      [11] Fleshman J, Sargent D J, Green E, et al. for The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(4):655–662. Discussion 662–664. [PubMed]. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762.

      [12] Jayne D G, Guillou P J, and Thorpe H, et al. UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(21):3061–3068. [PubMed]. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758.

      [13] Lacy A M, Delgado S, Castells A, et al. The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg. 2008; 248(1):1–7. [PubMed]. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816a9d65.

      [14] Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop W C, et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10(1):44–52. [PubMed]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3.

      [15] Milsom J W, Böhm B, Hammerhofer K A, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 187(1):46–54. Discussion 54–55. [PubMed]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00132-X.

  • Downloads

    Additional Files

  • How to Cite

    Elamin Elsadig Abdalla, M. A. (2020). Retrospective observational study and comparative review of lymph node yield in open vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. International Journal of Medicine, 9(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijm.v9i1.31237