A study on the correlation potential of compaction characteristics and atterberg limits of selected lateritic soils

  • Authors

    • G.O Adunoye Obafemi Awolowo University
    • A.A Ojo Obafemi Awolowo University
    • A.F Alasia Obafemi Awolowo University
    • M.O Olarewaju Obafemi Awolowo University
    2020-07-01
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijpr.v8i1.30689
  • Compaction, Dry Density, Liquid Limit, Optimum Moisture Content, Plastic Limit.
  • The importance of soil compaction for civil engineering construction and application cannot be over-emphasised. To perform soil compaction, numerous number of samples are required, with considerable time and laborious laboratory activities. This has necessitated the need to find models for the prediction of compaction characteristics, using easily determined soil properties. This work therefore undertook a study of the correlation potential of compaction characteristics and Atterberg limits of soils, with a view to modelling compaction characteristics, using Atterberg limits. To achieve this aim, soil samples were obtained from selected locations within Obafemi Awolowo University campus, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Preliminary, Atterberg limits and compaction tests were conducted on the soil samples, using standard procedure. Using Microsoft Excel and Xuru’s Regression tool, the laboratory test results were used to develop relationships between compaction characteristics (optimum moisture content and maximum dry density) and Atterberg limits (liquid limit and plastic limit). Results showed that the natural moisture content of soil samples ranged between 4.97 % and 19.72 %; liquid limit ranged between 27 % and 68 %; plastic limit ranged between 18.92 % and 63.01 %; and plasticity index ranged between 0.94 % and 14.63 %. The optimum moisture content ranged between 6.7 % and 27 %, while the maximum dry density ranged between 1560 kN/m3 and 2260 kN/m3. The results of regression analysis showed that the combination of liquid limit and plastic limit has a strong correlation with optimum moisture content (R2 = 0.870); while the combination (of liquid limit and plastic limit) showed a weak correlation with maximum dry density (R2 = 0.150). The study concluded that liquid limit and plastic limit could be used to estimate the optimum moisture content of the soils, by applying the developed relationship/equation.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Abdulazeez MO, Adunoye GO & Adekola AA (2020) Experimental study on the effects of some index properties on California bearing ratio of selected soils. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 11(1), 1562-1567.

      [2] Adunoye GO & Agbede OA (2013) Geotechnical evaluation of Opa dam, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. The International Journal of Engineering and Science 2(2), 160 – 165.

      [3] Adunoye GO, Badmus AB & Sagbele SA (2018) Experimental investigation of the influence of gradation parameters on Atterberg limits of soil. Archives of Current Research International 15(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.9734/ACRI/2018/45464.

      [4] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2003). User Benefit Analysis for Highways.

      [5] Bello AA. Ige JA & Tajudeen S (2007) Geotechnical characterization of lateritic soils in parts of Ejigbo Local Government Area, Southwestern Nigeria. LAUTECH Journal of Engineering and Technology 4(2), 34-38.

      [6] Bello AA & Adegoke CW (2010) Evaluation of geotechnical properties of Ilesha East Southwest Nigeria’s lateritic soil. Pacific Journal of Science and Technology 11(2), 617-624.

      [7] Blotz LR, Benson CH & Boutwell GP (1998) Estimating optimum water content and maximum dry unit weight for compacted clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 124(9), 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(907).

      [8] Boesse JMA (1989) Geological Map of the Obafemi Awolowo University Campus (Unpublished), Department of Geology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.

      [9] British Standard. Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Properties (1990). British Standard Institution, London, UK.

      [10] Das BM (2006). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 5th ed. Nelson, Canada.

      [11] Department of Geography, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife. Map of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife (2015).

      [12] Durotoye AB (1983) Quarternary Sediments in Nigeria. Edited by Kogbe C.A.

      [13] Faizah K (2005) Estimation of Compaction Parameters Based on Atterberg Limits. M.Eng Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia.

      [14] Federal Ministry of Works and Housing (1997). Nigerian General Specification for Roads and Bridges (Revised Edition) 2, 137-275.

      [15] Gofar N & Kassim KA (2008) Ground Improvement and Stabilisation. Univision Press, Selangor, Malaysia.

      [16] Idris A, Waziri MI, Abdulfatah AY & Umar M (2014) Modelling and prediction of compaction parameters based on Atterberg limits and clay content. Journal of Engineering and Technology 9(2), 24-27.

      [17] Johnson AW & Sallberg JR (1962). Factors Influencing Compaction Test Results. Highway Research Board Bulletin 319: 1-148.

      [18] Jumikis AR (1946) Geology and soils of the Newark (NJ) Metropolitan Area. J. Soil Mech. Found., ASCE 93(2), 71–95.

      [19] Liu C & Evett JB (2004) Soils and Foundations. SI Edition, Prentice Hall, Singapore.

      [20] Mohd R & Che G (2005) Correlation Regression between Soil Compaction Parameters and Atterberg Limits. B.Eng. Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia.

      [21] O’Flaherty CA (1988) Highway engineering 2. Edward Arnold Publishers, London, UK.

      [22] Pandian NS, Nagaraj TS & Manoj M (1997) Re-examination of compaction characteristics of fine-grained soils. Geotechnique 47(2), 363-366. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.2.363.

      [23] Raju NV, Srimurali, M & Prasad KN (2014) Functional correlations between compaction characteristics, un-drained shear strength and Atterberg limits. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 11(3), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-1134109115.

      [24] Ratnam UV & Prasa KN (2019) Prediction of compaction and compressibility characteristics of compacted soils. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 14(3), 621-632.

      [25] Shahin MA, Jaksa, MB & Maier HR (2009) Recent Advances and Future Challenges for Artificial Neural Systems in Geotechnical Engineering Applications. Advances in Artificial Neural Systems 2009, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/308239.

      [26] Sn MA, Jaksa MB & Maier HR (2009) Recent Advances and Future Challenges for Artificial Neural Systems in Geotechnical Engineering Applications. Advance Artificial Neural System, Article ID 308239. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/308239.

      [27] Sridharan A & Nagaraj HB (2005) Plastic limit and compaction characteristics of fine-grained soils. Ground Improvement 9(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2005.9.1.17.

      [28] Tsegay T, Fikre H & Abebe T (2017) Correlation between compaction characteristics and Atterberg limits of fine-grained soil found in Addis Ababa, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 8(6), 357-364.

      [29] Xuru’s regression tools. Available: http://www.xuru.org. Ac4cessed on 15 April 2020.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Adunoye, G., Ojo, A., Alasia, A., & Olarewaju, M. (2020). A study on the correlation potential of compaction characteristics and atterberg limits of selected lateritic soils. International Journal of Physical Research, 8(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijpr.v8i1.30689