Neural oscillations under binocular rivalry: a brain activity pattern formation perspective

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    Binocular rivalry is a phenomenon in which individuals react to two overlaid images that are presented to both eyes of the individuals as if the two images were presented one after each other in time in a repetitive fashion. Recently, human brain activity has been measured during binocular rivalry. Previously reported brain activity data was evaluated and modeled from a human pattern formation perspective that states that the human brain in binocular rivalry experiments acts as a neural self-oscillator. The neural self-oscillator forms and dissolves brain activity patterns related to the two images in an alternating, rhythmic self-organized fashion. Task-related oscillatory components hidden in the brain activity raw data were identified using power spectral analysis. Those oscillatory components were subsequently modelled using a previously developed mathematical model for brain activity self-oscillations. The identified task-related oscillatory components showed similar power spectrum functions for both brain activity patterns. A reciprocal relationship between the amplitudes of the two patterns was found. The oscillator model was able to reproduce the power spectrum functions when noisy perturbations were taken into account.



  • Keywords

    Binocular Rivalry; Neural Oscillations; Vision; Pattern Formation; Modeling.

  • References

      [1] Pettigrew JD (2006), searching for the switch: neural basis for perceptual rivalry alternations. Brain and Mind 2, 85–118.

      [2] Leopold DA & Logothetis NK (1999), Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 254-264.

      [3] Blake R & Logothetis NK (2002), Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3, 13-31.

      [4] Hernandez-Lorca M, Sandberg K, Kessel D, Fernandez-Folgueiras U, Overgaard M & Carretie L (2019), Binocular rivalry and emotion: Implications for neural correlates of consciousness and emotional biases in conscious perception. Cortex 120, 539-555.

      [5] Haken H (1996), Principles of brain functioning. Springer, Berlin.

      [6] Frank TD (2014a), A nonlinear physics model based on extended synergetics for the flow of infant actions during infant-mother face-to-face communication. International Journal of Scientific World 2, 62–74.

      [7] Frank T (2019), Determinism and self-organization of human perception and performance. Springer, Berlin.

      [8] Carmel D, Acraro M, Kastner S & Hasson U (2010), How to create and use binocular rivalry. Journal of Visualized Experiments 45, e2030.

      [9] Leopold DA, Wilke M, Maier A & Logothetis NK (2002), Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience 5, 605-609.

      [10] Myerson J, Miezin F & Allman J (1981), Binocular rivalry in Macaque monkeys and humans: a comparative study in perception. Behaviour Analysis Letters 1, 149-159.

      [11] Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT & Kanwisher N (2007), Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21, 753–759.

      [12] Frank TD (2014b), Multistable perception in schizophrenia: a model-based analysis via coarse-grained order parameter dynamics and a comment on the law. Universal Journal of Psychology 2, 231–240.

      [13] Frank TD & O’Leary J (2018), Motion-induced blindness and the spinning dancer paradigm: a neuronal network approach based on synergetics. In Horizon in Neuroscience Research (Costa A & Villalbaon E eds.), Nova Publishers, New York, pp. 51-80.




Article ID: 31610
DOI: 10.14419/ijpr.v9i1.31610

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.