Simulation and optimization integrated gasification combined cycle by used aspen hysys and aspen plus

  • Authors

    • Mohsen Darabi Young Researchers and Elite Club, shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University , shahrood
    • Mohammad Mohammadiun Department of Mechanical Engineering,Shahrood Branch
    • Hamid Mohammadiun Department of Mechanical Engineering,Shahrood Branch
    • Saeed Mortazavi Department of chemical Engineering,Shahrood Branch
    • Mostafa Montazeri Department of chemical Engineering,Shahrood Branch
    2015-05-07
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijsw.v3i1.4583
  • Conceptual Modeling, Process Simulation, IGCC Power Plant, Gas Purification Units, Clean Power Production.
  • Electricity is an indispensable amenity in present society. Among all those energy resources, coal is readily available all over the world and has risen only moderately in price compared with other fuel sources. As a result, coal-fired power plant remains to be a fundamental element of the world's energy supply. IGCC, abbreviation of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle, is one of the primary designs for the power-generation market from coal-gasification. This work presents a in the proposed process, diluted hydrogen is combusted in a gas turbine. Heat integration is central to the design. Thus far, the SGR process and the HGD unit are not commercially available. To establish a benchmark. Some thermodynamic inefficiencies were found to shift from the gas turbine to the steam cycle and redox system, while the net efficiency remained almost the same. A process simulation was undertaken, using Aspen Plus and the engineering equation solver (EES).The The model has been developed using Aspen Hysys® and Aspen Plus®. Parts of it have been developed in Matlab, which is mainly used for artificial neural network (ANN) training and parameters estimation. Predicted results of clean gas composition and generated power present a good agreement with industrial data. This study is aimed at obtaining a support tool for optimal solutions assessment of different gasification plant configurations, under different input data sets.

  • References

    1. [1] IGCC Puertollano ELCOGAS, 2001, A clean coal gasification power plant.

      [2] CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Jaume Almera Institute, Spain.

      [3] S.Balzioc and P.G.W. Hawksley, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. (1970), 9, no. 4, p 521.

      [4] R. Loison and R. Chauvin, Chimie et Industrie, (1964), 91, no. 3, p 269.

      [5] F. García-Labiano, J. Adánez et al., Fuel, (1996), 75, no. 5, p 585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)00291-X.

      [6] S. Kambara, T. Takarada et al., Energy & Fuels (1993), 7, 1013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef00042a045.

      [7] Wen, C. Y. and Chaung, T. Z. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev, (1979), 18, no.4, p 684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/i260072a020.

      [8] Govind, R. and Shah, J., AIChE Journal, (1984), 30, 79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690300113.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Darabi, M., Mohammadiun, M., Mohammadiun, H., Mortazavi, S., & Montazeri, M. (2015). Simulation and optimization integrated gasification combined cycle by used aspen hysys and aspen plus. International Journal of Scientific World, 3(1), 178-186. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijsw.v3i1.4583