# The comparative analysis of the two dimensional Laplace equation using the Galerkin finite element method with the exact solution for various domains (circular and rectangular) with triangular elemental meshing

## DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/ijamr.v4i1.4042## Published:

2015-02-25## Keywords:

Finite Element Method, Laplace Equation, Triangular Elements.## Abstract

Laplace Equation is used in many areas of studies such as potential theory and the fundamental forces of nature, Newtonian theory of gravity and electrostatics. It is used in Probability theory and Markov Chains as well as potential flows in fluid mechanics. Laplace Equation is used in various research areas and for this reason, to determine an accurate solution to this equation is of importance. In this study, the Finite Element Method is used to approximate the solution of the 2D Laplace Equation for two regions, circular and rectangular domains. These are compared to the exact solutions of the systems subjected to various physical restrictions; boundary conditions. This was done by using a mesh generator in Matlab, Distmesh, to obtain a mesh of triangular elements and then using Matlab to plot the exact and the approximated solutions as well as to determine the errors;Â Â Â norm. For these domains, the number of elements in the mesh was incremented and it was noted there was a convergence of the approximated to the actual solution. The boundary conditions were altered to observe the changes in the regions' field variable distribution (intensity values) of the Matlab plots.

## References

[1] C. Norotte et al., Experimental evaluation of apparant tissue surface tension based on the exact solution of the Laplace Equation, A letters Journal Exploring the Frontiers of Physics, (2008).

[2] C.I. Connolly and R.A Grupen, On the Applications of harmonic functions to robotics, Journals of Robotic Systems, (1993), pp.931-946.

[3] S.S. Rao, Finite Element Method in Engineering, Fourth Edition,Elsevier Science and Technology Books, (2004).

[4] P.J. Olver, Introduction to Partial Differential Equations, Springer, (2014).

[5] G.E. Urroz, Utah State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Solutions to a potentialow in a rectangular domain. http://ocw.usu.edu/Civiland Environmental Engineering/Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering/PotentialFlowRectangularDomain.pdf. Revised October 2004 . Accessed April 15, (2014).

[6] P.V. Patil and J.S.V.R.K. Prasad, Solution of Laplace Equation using Finite Element Method, Pratibha: International Jounal of Science, Spirituality, Business and Technology, Vol.2, (2013),pp.40-46.

[7] P.V. Patil and J.S.V.R.K. Prasad, Numerical solution for two dimensional Laplace Equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions, IOSR Journal of Mathematics, Vol.6, (2013), pp.66-75.

[8] G.R. Liu and S.S Quek, The Finite Element Method A practical course, Elsevier Science Ltd, (2003).

[9] J.N. Reddy, An Introduction to the Finite Element Method, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York City, (2006).

[10] P-O. Persson and G. Strang, A simple mesh generator in MATLAB, SIAM Review, Vol.46, No.2, (2004), pp.329-345.

[11] E. Isaacson and H.B. Keller, Analysis of Numerical Methods, Courier Dover Publications, (1994).

[12] M. Shabbir, M. Raq, M.O. Ahmed, A. Pervaiz and R. Siddique, Finite Element solution for two dimensional Laplace Equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions, Pak. J. Engg. and Appl. Sci, Vol.10, (2012), pp.97-102.

[13] S. Gil, M.E. Saleta and D. Tobia, Experimental study of the Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions in twodimensional electrostatic problems, American Journal of Physics, Vol.70, No.12, (2002), pp.1208-1213.