Effect of SDBS on the drag reduction characteristics of polyacrylamide in a rotating disk apparatus

  • Authors

    • Hayder A. Abdul Bari University Malaysia Pahang
    • Zainab Yousif University Malaysia Pahang
    • Zulkefli Bin Yaacob
    • Edward Oluwasogaakindoyo
    2015-08-17
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v4i3.4883
  • Drag Reduction, Complexes, Polymer, Surfactant, TEM.

  • Abstract

    This paper focuses on the determination of the interaction between polymer (Polyacrylamide (PAM)) and surfactant (Sodium dod benzene sulfonate (SDBS)) as a drag reducer using Rotating Disk apparatus (RDA) at various concentrations (500, 700, 1000, 1500 and 2000) ppm individually and in the combined form under turbulent conditions at different rotation speed up to 3000 rpm, as well as studying their mechanisms as a drag reducer. The results show that the maximum percent drag reduction increases to (40, 41, 43, 45 and 48)% by using the combined additives of surfactant and polymer at the above concentrations respectively, with slower degradation and display drag reduction for a larger range of Reynolds numbers. The nano and micro particles formed from the combined PAA and SDBSA was studied using cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) techniques. The images show the surrounding of polymer chain to the surfactant micelle to form an aggregate structure. A hexagonal crystalline form was suggested to describe the shape of the aggregate structure.

  • References

    1. [1] Hassan, Y. and J. Ortiz-Villafuerte. 2002. Experimental study of micro-bubble drag reduction using particle image velocimetry. 11th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics.

      [2] Bewersdorff, H., 1986. Heterogeneous Drag Reduction in Turbulent Pipe Flow. In: B. GAMPERT, Ed, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 337-348.

      [3] Azaiez, J., 2000. Reduction of free shear flows instability: effects of polymer versus fibre additives. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 91(2): p. 233-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(99)00106-8.

      [4] Deutsch, S., et al., 2004. Microbubble drag reduction in rough walled turbulent boundary layers with comparison against polymer drag reduction. Experiments in fluids, 37(5): 731-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0863-6.

      [5] Ioannou, K. and N.O.A. Jorgen, P., 2005. Phase inversion in dispersed liquid–liquid flows. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 29: 331-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2004.05.003.

      [6] Matras, Z., T. Malcher, and B. Gzyl-Malcher, 2008. The influence of polymer–surfactant aggregates on drag reduction. Thin Solid Films, 516(24):8848-8851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.057.

      [7] Segawa, T., et al., 2007. Turbulent drag reduction by means of alternating suction and blowing jets. Fluid dynamics research, 39(7):552-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluiddyn.2007.01.002.

      [8] Zhang, D.-Y., et al., 2011. Numerical simulation and experimental study of drag-reducing surface of a real shark skin. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 23(2):204-211.

      [9] Zhen, L. and Y.A. Hassan, 2006. Wavelet autocorrelation identification of the turbulent flow multi-scales for drag reduction process in microbubbly flows. Chemical engineering science, 61(21):7107-7114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.031.

      [10] Kazi, M.S.N., G.G. Duffy, and X.D. Chen, 1999. Heat transfer in the drag reducing regime of wood pulp fibre suspensions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 73(3):247-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(99)00047-9.

      [11] Metzner, A. and A. Metzner, 1970. Stress levels in rapid extensional flows of polymeric fluids. Rheologica Acta, 9(2):174-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01973476.

      [12] Deutsch, S., et al., 2006. Combined polymer and microbubble drag reduction on a large flat plate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 556: 309-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022112006009487.

      [13] Shenoy, A., 1984. A review on drag reduction with special reference to micellar systems. Colloid and Polymer Science, 262(4):319-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01410471.

      [14] Missel, P.J., et al., 1980. Thermodynamic analysis of the growth of sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 84(9): 1044-1057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100446a021.

      [15] Missel, P.J., et al., 1983. Influence of chain length on the sphere-to-rod transition in alkyl sulfate micelles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 87(7): 1264-1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100230a032.

      [16] Elson, T. and J. Garside, 1983. Drag reduction in aqueous cationic soap solutions. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 12(2): 121-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-0257(83)80033-0.

      [17] Smith, R. and W. Tiederman, 1991. The mechanism of polymer thread drag reduction. Rheologica acta, 30(2): 103-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01134599.

      [18] Nizri, G., et al., 2014. Microstructural characterization of micro-and nanoparticles formed by polymer-surfactant interactions. Langmuir, 20(11): 4380-4385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la0364441.

      [19] Grüneberger, R. and W. Hage, 2011. Drag characteristics of longitudinal and transverse riblets at low dimensionless spacings. Experiments in Fluids, 50(2): 363-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0936-7.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Bari, H. A. A., Yousif, Z., Yaacob, Z. B., & Oluwasogaakindoyo, E. (2015). Effect of SDBS on the drag reduction characteristics of polyacrylamide in a rotating disk apparatus. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(3), 326-332. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v4i3.4883

    Received date: 2015-06-03

    Accepted date: 2015-06-29

    Published date: 2015-08-17