An evaluation of the current status of EIA system in Pakistan focusing Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

  • Authors

    • Deedar Ahmed University of Haripur, Pakistan.
    • Abdullah Khan
    • Zulfiqar Ali
    • Daulat Khan
    • Ihsan Ullah Afridi
    2018-03-08
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v7i2.7536
  • Christopher Wood Model, Decision Making, EIA, EPA, KP.

  • Abstract

    Pakistan, like many other developing countries has adopted the integration of environmental concerns in its social and economic planning. Pakistan has developed some environmental legislation and policies at the national level for the protection and conservation of environment. This paper evaluates the current status of the environmental assessment system in Pakistan and especially in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province by using the Christopher Wood Evaluation Model. The EIA system in Pakistan has many strong features like the legal basis for assessment process, strong apprehension and willingness for screening and scoping, stakeholder’s involvement and participation, mitigation of impacts, and cost & benefits of EIA system. The limitations found in the assessment process of Pakistan includes Preparation of EIA report and its review, monitoring and auditing, strategic environmental assessment, while consideration of alternatives and decision making mechanisms are completely ignored. Besides these, the study revealed the practice of ineffective remedial measures, non-professional, inexperience and unregistered consultants involved in the environmental assessment and sporadically the politically oriented decision making process. This evaluation led to a series of suggestions regarding the improvement of EIA system in Pakistan and especially KP Province with a view to develop its quality and effectiveness.

  • References

    1. [1] Ortolano, L., Jenkins, B. and Abracosa, R. (1987). Speculations on when and why EIA is effective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 7(4), pp.285-292.https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(87)90002-3.

      [2] Hirji, R. and Ortolano, L. (1991). EIA effectiveness and mechanisms of control. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 7(3), pp.154-167.https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629108722508.

      [3] Wen-Shyan, L., Williams, W. P. and A.W. Bark, 1996. Development of an Environmental Impact Assessment Evaluation Model and Its Application: Taiwan Case Study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16 (2): 115-133.https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00107-7.

      [4] Wood, C. and Coppell, L. (1999) ‘An evaluation of the Hong Kong environmental impact assessment system’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 17(1), pp. 21–31.https://doi.org/10.3152/147154699781767936.

      [5] Baker, A; and C, Wood; (2002). A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(3), pp.213-234.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00004-5.

      [6] Balsam, A, and C, Wood (2002). A comparative Evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19 (4) 387-404.

      [7] Riffat, R. and Khan, D., (2006). A review and evaluation of the environmental impact assessment process in Pakistan, Journal of Applied sciences and environmental sanitation, 1, 17-29.

      [8] Murthy, A. and Patra, H.S. (2005) Environment impact assessment process in India and the drawbacks, Environment Conservation Team Report. Available at: https://elibrarywcl.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/environment-impact-assessment-process-in-india-and-the-drawbacks-1.pdf (Accessed: 16 November 2012).

      [9] Government of Pakistan (GoP). (1983). Pakistan Environmental Protection Ordinance, 1983, Islamabad; Gazette of Pakistan

      [10] Government of Pakistan (GoP). (1997). Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997, Gazette of Pakistan

      [11] Sadler B. &Verheem R. (1996). Strategic Environmental Assessment: Status, Challenges and Future Directions. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, the Netherlands, and the International Study of Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment.

      [12] OECD. 2006. The challenge of capacity development – working towards good practice. DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved 27 March 2016 from: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4/36/36326495.pdf.

      [13] World Bank, 1996. The Impact of Environmental Assessment: The World Bank’s Experience, Second Environmental Assessment Review. Land, Water, and Natural Habitats Division, Environmental Department, the World Bank, Washington, D.C.

      [14] Alshuwaikhat, H. (2005). Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), pp.307-317.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.003.

      [15] Annandale, D. (2001). Developing and evaluating environmental impact assessment systems for small developing countries. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(3), pp.187-193.https://doi.org/10.3152/147154601781766998.

      [16] Aslam, F. (2006). Environmental Impact Assessment in Pakistan-Overview, Implementation and Effectiveness. Master. Department of Architecture and Built Environment. KTH University. Sweden.

      [17] Government of Pakistan (GoP). (2002). Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency Country Assessment Report. Revised Draft-2. Ministry of Environment, Local Government and Rural Development World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa.

      [18] Jennifer C. Li., (2008) Environmental Impact Assessments in Developing Countries: An Opportunity for Greater Environmental Security? Available at: http://fess-global.org/WorkingPapers/EIA.pdf (Accessed: 16 August 2012).

      [19] Leu, W., Williams, W. and Bark, A. (1996). Development of an environmental impact assessment evaluation model and its application: Taiwan case study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(2), pp.115-133.https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00107-7.

      [20] Modak, P. and Biswas, A., (1999). Conducting environmental impact assessment in developing countries Toronto: United Nations University Press.

      [21] Nizami, A.-S., Molander, S., Asam, Z., Rafique, R., Korres, N.E., Kiely, G. and Murphy, J.D. (2011) ‘Comparative analysis using EIA for developed and developing countries: Case studies of hydroelectric power plants in Pakistan, Norway and Sweden’, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18(2), pp. 134–142.https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.559399.

      [22] Ogola,A.,Pacifica,F.(2007) Environmental Impact Assessment general procedures, Geothermal Training Program in Kenya.

      [23] Ortolano, L. and Shepherd, A. (1995). Environmental Impact Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities. Impact Assessment, 13(1), pp.3-30.https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1995.9726076.

      [24] Wood, C. (1993). Environmental Impact Assessment in Victoria: Australian Discretion Rules EA!.Journal of Environmental Management, 39(4), pp.281-295.https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1993.1071.

      [25] Wood, C. (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries: An Overview. Conference On, New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development: Methods and Practice.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Ahmed, D., Khan, A., Ali, Z., Khan, D., & Ullah Afridi, I. (2018). An evaluation of the current status of EIA system in Pakistan focusing Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v7i2.7536

    Received date: 2017-04-02

    Accepted date: 2017-04-02

    Published date: 2018-03-08