Efficient way of implementing the random and GM (Gauss-Markov) mobility model in MANET

  • Authors

    • M Nagaraju
    • K Raghava Rao
    • K Vijayalakshmi
    2018-03-18
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10595
  • Mobility, AODV, Performance, Throughput, Mobility.

  • In Mobile Adhoc Network (MANET) nodes are communicating each other with the help of routing protocol. In Adhoc networks, a node having high mobility, with that node’s moving randomly from node to node. For observing the movement mobility, we are studying different forms of mobility. These models can deploy the mobility of the network condition, including the various parameters such as the size of the network, traffic models of data, throughput and the PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio) are used as performance Parameters. We are investigating the RWP (Random Waypoint) and GM (Gauss-Markov) mobility model to express efficiency of Adhoc routing protocol by using the OMNET++ simulator .The result of the simulator shows that the mobility has more influence upon MANET protocol with the increasing node density. Here, we evaluated RWP and GM mobility model with AODV protocol. The study of these models illustrates dissimilar outcomes related inputs with the increasing performance of the pause time rises among the speed and number of nodes.

  • References

    1. [1] C. Perkins et al., “Ad-Hoc on-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routingâ€, RFC3561, July 2003.

      [2] P. GÓMEZ et al., “Análisis de protocolos de enrutamiento para redes de sensoresinalámbricas,†e-Archivo, repositorioinstitucional de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.

      [3] V. Davies et al.,, A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2002.

      [4] Martin Appiah, Performance Comparison of Mobility Models in Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET), Available through: IEEE/IET Electronic Library. Accessed on September 2017.

      [5] Mohsin et al, Investigating the Impacts of Entity and Group Mobility Models in MANETs, Available through: IEEE/IET Electronic Library 2016.

      [6] Shukla et al., “The Efficiency Analysis of Mobility Model usingRouting Protocols, IJCA 2012, pp. 6-10.

      [7] Ahmed F et al., Performance Investigation on Two-Classes of MANET Routing Protocols across Various Mobility models with QoS Constraints, IJCNC, 2011, 3(2), pp. 197-215.

      [8] Jayakumar G et al., Performance Comparison of Mobile Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocol,IJCSNS, 2007, 7(11), pp. 77-84.

      [9] KWAK BJ et al., A Standard Measure of Mobility for Evaluating Mobile Ad Hoc Network Performance, IEICE TRANS. COMMUN., 2003, E86-B(11), pp. 3236-3243.

      [10] Sunil Kumar, et al., “An Inspection of Mobility Models Routine on Routing Protocols in Ad Hoc Network, IJEIT, 2013, 2(8), pp. 269-274.

      [11] Rafiq M et al “Comparative Analysis of Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in MANETâ€, IJCA, 2013, 82(5), pp. 1-6.

      [12] Shukla AK et al., “An Estimation of Routing Protocols in Mobility Models Used for Ad Hoc Networks: Simulation Study, ICACA-2013, Proceedings Published IJCA (975-8887), pp. 21-27.

      [13] Agarwal CP et al., “Evaluation of Varrying Mobility Models &Network Loads on DSDV Protocol of MANETsâ€, IJCSE, 2009, 1(2), pp. 40-46.

      [14] Subramani A et al., Node Mobility Tracking in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks in their Geographical Position (Dynamic Networks), IJSCE, ISSN: 2231-2307, 2011, 1(5), pp. 36-40.

      [15] Tonk G et al., Performance Comparison of Ad-Hoc NetworkRouting Protocols using NS-2, IJITEE, 2012 1(1), pp. 53-57.

      [16] P. Kanungo et al., “Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR AND DSDV Routing Protocols using NS2 Simulator,†Procedia Engineering, vol. 23, p. 229, 2015.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Nagaraju, M., Raghava Rao, K., & Vijayalakshmi, K. (2018). Efficient way of implementing the random and GM (Gauss-Markov) mobility model in MANET. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.7), 270-273. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10595