Effect of personality traits and learning styles towards students’ academic achievement in Johor Bahru

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of personality traits and learning styles towards the students’ academic achievement in Johor Bahru. A total of 101 students from IPG Kampus Temenggong Ibrahim were chosen to be part of the respondents with the use of simple random sampling. The instrument Big Five Inventory (BFI), Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory and The students’ academic achievement is measured through the Cumulative Grade Point Average, also known as CGPA. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square Test, Spearman’s Correlation and Multiple Regression was used to anser research questions. The findings revealed that the most common personality traits displayed by the students are Openness and Conscientiousness while the most common learning style displayed by the students is Converger. The research also revealed that there is no significant effect of the combination of both the personality traits and learning style towards the prediction of the academic achievement among school students. The same goes to the difference of personality traits and learning style between male and female students was not significant as well.



  • Keywords

    Personality Traits, Academic Achievement, Learning Style

  • References

      [1] Hogan R, Hogan J & Roberts BW (1996), Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and Answers. American Psychologist 51, 469-477.

      [2] McCrae RR & Costa PT (1987), Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(1), 81-90.

      [3] Messick S (1984), The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist 19(2), 59-74.

      [4] Cano-Garcia & Hughes (2000), Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology 20(4), 413-43.

      [5] Kolb DA (1984), Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

      [6] Witkin HA (1973), The role of cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher-student relations. Research Bulletin, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, 73-101.

      [7] Gregorc AF (1979a), Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership 36, 234-236.

      [8] Witkin HA, Moore CA, Goodenough DR & Cox PW (1997), Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research 47, 1-64

      [9] Damavandi AJ, Mahyuddin R, Elias H, Daud SM & Shabani J (2011), Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. International Journal of Psychological Studies 3(2).

      [10] Komarraju M, Karau SJ, Schmeck RR & Avdic A (2011), The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences 51(4), 472–477.

      [11] Costa PT, Jr., & McCrae RR (1992), Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

      [12] Allport GW (1961), Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

      [13] McCrae RR & Costa, PT (1999), A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin and O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (139‒153). New York: The Guilford Press.

      [14] Busato V. V, Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1998). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 129–140.

      [15] Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 201−228

      [16] Busato VV, Prins FJ, Elshout JJ & Hamaker C (2000), Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences 29(6), 1057–1068.

      [17] Chamorro-Premuzic T, Furnham A & Lewis M (2007), Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences 17, 241–250.

      [18] McCrae RR, Costa PT (1997), Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 52, 509–516.

      [19] Duff A, Boyle E, Dunleavy K & Ferguson J (2004), The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences 36(8), 1907–1920.

      [20] Furnham A, Chamorro-Premuzic T & McDougall F (2003), Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences 14, 47−64.

      [21] Jackson CJ & Lawty-Jones M (1996), Explaining the overlap between personality and learning styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 293–300.

      [22] Daniel J, Ozer & Benet-Mart´ ´ınez, V (2006), personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 8.1–8.21.

      [23] Judge TA, Jackson CL, Shaw JC, Scott BA & Rich BL (2007), Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(1), 107-127.

      [24] Sternberg RJ (1997), Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.

      [25] Kolb AY & Kolb DA (2005), The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 Technical Specifi cations.

      [26] Kolb DA & Fry RE (1974), Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. MIT Alfred P. Sloan School of Management.

      [27] Vermunt JD (2005), Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education 49(3), 205–234.

      [28] Khan, A. (2012). Sex Differences’ in Educational Encouragement and Academic Achievement. A. Khan, Psychological Reports 111 (1), 149-155.

      [29] Khan, A., Hamdan, A.R., Ahmad, R., Mustaffa, M.S., & Mahalle, S. (2016). Problem-Solving Coping and Social Support as Mediators of Academic Stress and Suicidal Ideation Among Malaysian and Indian Adolescents. Community Mental Health Journal. 52(2), 245-250.

      [30] Khan, A & Husain, A. (2010). Social Support as a Moderator of Positive Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Reports, 106, 534-538.

      [31] Alshemmeri, F., Putih, A., Siraj, S., Khan, A., Abdallah, N. (2011). Art Ability and Academic Achievement in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Role of Age and Sex. New Educational Review, 26 (4), 238-247

      [32] Khan, A. (2013). Predictors of Positive Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-being among North Indian Adolescents: Role of Mentoring and Educational Encouragement. Social Indicators Research, 114, 3, 1285-1293

      [33] Ghani, F.A., Latif, A.A., Aziz, A.A., & Khan, A. (2014). Validity and Reliability Analysis of the ‘SayangKU’ (MyLove) in Intervention for Addressing Adolescents Involved in Free Sex. Journal of Religion & Health, 54, 1375–1386




Article ID: 10943
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.10.10943

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.