Consumer Preference Analysis for Websites Using e-TailQ and AHP

  • Authors

    • Loveleen Gaur
    • Kumari Anshu
    2018-04-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.11.10999
  • e-TailQ, AHP, Customer preference, Retail Website, E-tailing

  • In today’s scenario when the world is going online, websites are the first point of contact for the consumers. It has become a necessity to have a website nowadays to be effective and successful in this internet infiltrated world. A well-thought-out web design plan generates an extraordinary customer experience. In this paper we study the various scales and model given by researchers at different point of time related to website service quality. Here we have taken into consideration the e-Tail Quality (e-TailQ) scale for our study purpose. The model has five factors of online retailing customer experience: website layout, website information, reliability/customer service, fulfilment and security/privacy. These factors were then tested based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model which is based on an exponential scale to calculate each criterion’s relative weight. The research is an endeavor to move further in measuring customer preference towards the service qualities offered by the websites and developing a more focused approach.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Albayrak, E., & Erensal, Y. C. (2004). Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 15, 491-503.

      [2] Collier, J. E., & Bienstock, C. C. (2006). Measuring service quality in e-retailing. Journal of Service Research 8, 260-275.

      [3] Compuware, G. w. (2011). Why web performance matters:Is your site driving customers away? Available at: www.mcrinc.com/Documents/.../201110_why_web_performance_matters.pdf.

      [4] Cheng, E. W., & Li, H. (2001). Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Information Management & Computer Security 9, 61-70.

      [5] Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2002). WebQual: A measure of website quality. Marketing theory and applications 13, 432-438.

      [6] Francis, J. E., & White, L. (2004). Value across fulfillment-product categories of internet shopping. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 14, 226-234.

      [7] Herzberg, F. (1974). Motivation-hygiene profiles: Pinpointing what ails the organization. Organizational dynamics 3, 18-29.

      [8] Hwang, C. L. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state of the art survey. New York: Springer-Verlag.

      [9] Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & management,38, 23-33.

      [10] Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2007). WebQual: An instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11, 51-87.

      [11] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). ES-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of service research 7, 213-233.

      [12] PWC. (2015). eCommerce in India: Accelerating Growth. Available at: www.pwc.in/ghost-templates/ecommerce-in-india-accelerating-growth.html.

      [13] Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European journal of operational research 145, 85-91.

      [14] Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology 15, 234-281.

      [15] Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, NY.: McGraw-Hill.

      [16] Schaffer, E. (2000). A better way for web design. InformationWeek, 784, 194-194.

      [17] Taneja, M. (2016, May 5). Internet users in India to cross 500 mn in 2016: Prasad . Business-Standard.

      [18] Mishra, V., & Singh, V. (2015). Selection of appropriate electronic banking channel alternative: Critical analysis using analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Bank Marketing 33, 223-242.

      [19] Van Riel, A. C., Semeijn, J., & Pauwels, P. (2004). Online travel service quality: the role of pre-transaction services. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 15, 475-493.

      [20] Yadav, V., & Sharma, M. K. (2015). Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using fuzzy AHP approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22, 1158-1174.

      [21] Voss, C. A. (2003). Rethinking paradigms of service: Service in a virtual environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 23, 88-104.

      [22] Wang, J. J., & Yang, D. L. (2007). Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research 34, 3691-3700.

      [23] Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality. Journal of retailing 79, 183-198.

      [24] Zhang, P., & Von Dran, G. (2001, January), Expectations and rankings of Web site quality features: Results of two studies on user perceptions. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 10-pp.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Gaur, L., & Anshu, K. (2018). Consumer Preference Analysis for Websites Using e-TailQ and AHP. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.11), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.11.10999