Effect of the Window Position in the Building Envelope on Energy Consumption

  • Authors

    • Neveen Y. Azmy Tanta University
    • Rania E. Ashmawy Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST)
    2018-08-22
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11174
  • Energy efficient, window position, day lighting, Thermal comfort, Cairo, WWR (window wall ratio).

  • Abstract

    Windows play a significant role as they largely influence the energy load. Although there are many studies on the energy-efficient windows design, there is still a lack in information about the mutual impact of windows’ size, position and orientation on the energy loads. In this paper, the effect of different window positions and orientations on the energy consumption in a typical room in an administrative building that is located in the hot climatic conditions of Cairo city, Egypt is considered. This case study has been modeled and analyzed to achieve good environmental performance for architectural space, as well as assessing its impact on the amount of natural lighting required by using the Energy Plus program. The study concludes that the WWR (Window Wall Ratio) 20% square north-oriented upper  opening consumes 25% lower energy than the rectangular 3:1 opening in the lower west-oriented façade. The upper openings are the highest in terms of light intensity, as they cover about 50% of the room area. The WWR 30% rectangular north-oriented upper 3:1 opening consumes 29% lower energy than the rectangular lower 3:1opening in the façade. Regarding light intensity, the upper openings are the best for natural lighting as the light covers more than 60% of the room area.

                                                                                                                                                                  

     

  • References

    1. [1] Hanna, G. B. (2011). Energy efficiency building codes for Egypt. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 5(12).

      [2] Zachman, W., & Carlisle, N. (2001). Low-Energy Building Design Guidelines: Energy-Efficient Design for New Federal Facilities (No. DOE/GO-102001-0950; NREL/BK-710-25807). National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (US).

      [3] Jónsson, T., Pinson, P., & Madsen, H. (2010). On the market impact of wind energy forecasts. Energy Economics, 32(2), 313-320.

      [4] Organization of Energy Planning (OEP), .(1998),Directory of Architecture and Energy.

      [5] Bokel, R. M. J. (2007, September). The effect of window position and window size on the energy demand for heating, cooling and electric lighting. In Building Simulation (Vol. 10).

      [6] A.M. Koohsari, R. Fayaz, B.M. Kari, (2015), The Influence of Window Dimensions and Location on Residential Building Energy Consumption by Integrating Thermal and Lighting Analysis in a Mild and Humid Climate, BRIS Journal Of Advances in Science and Technology 3, ,187–194.

      [7] Morrissey, J., Moore, T., & Horne, R. E. (2011). Affordable passive solar design in a temperate climate: An experiment in residential building orientation. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 568-577.

      [8] Persson, M. L., Roos, A., & Wall, M. (2006). Influence of window size on the energy balance of low energy houses. Energy and Buildings, 38(3), 181-188.

      [9] Pai, Maya Yashwanth, (2015), "Effect of Building Orientation and Window Glazing on the Energy Consumption of HVAC System of an Office Building for Different Climate Zones." International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) 4.9 ,838-843.

      [10] Building and Construction Authority, (2010), Building planning and massing , The Centre for Sustainable Buildings and Construction.

      [11] Acosta, I., Campano, M. Ã., & Molina, J. F. (2016). Window design in architecture: Analysis of energy savings for lighting and visual comfort in residential spaces. Applied Energy, 168, 493-506.

      [12] Al-Tamimi, N. A. M., Fadzil, S. F. S., & Harun, W. M. W. (2011). The effects of orientation, ventilation, and varied WWR on the thermal performance of residential rooms in the tropics. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(2), 142.

      [13] Hassouneh, K., Alshboul, A., & Al-Salaymeh, A. (2010). Influence of windows on the energy balance of apartment buildings in Amman. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(8), 1583-1591.

      [14] Muhaisen, A., and H. Dabboor. (2015), "Studying the Impact of Orientation, Size, and Glass Material of Windows on Heating and Cooling Energy Demand of the Gaza Strip Buildings." Journal of Architecture and Planning 27, no1: 1-15.

      [15] Goia, F. (2016). Search for the optimal window-to-wall ratio in office buildings in different European climates and the implications on total energy saving potential. Solar Energy, 132, 467-492.

      [16] Energy Efficient Building Guidelines for MENA region. November (2013).

      [17] Florides, G. A., Tassou, S. A., Kalogirou, S. A., & Wrobel, L. C. (2002). Measures used to lower building energy consumption and their cost effectiveness. Applied Energy, 73(3), 299-328.

      [18] Pacheco, R., Ordóñez, J., & Martínez, G. (2012). Energy efficient design of building: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), 3559-3573.

      [19] Kim, S., Zadeh, P. A., Staub-French, S., Froese, T., & Cavka, B. T. (2016). Assessment of the impact of window size, position and orientation on building energy load using BIM. Procedia Engineering, 145, 1424-1431.

      [20] http://www.energy-designtools.aud.ucla.edu/climate-consultant/request-climate consultant.php.

      [21] U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Technologies Office (BTO), EnergyPlus, <https://energyplus.net/>, last visited June (2017).

      [22] Anđelković, A. S., Mujan, I., & Dakić, S. (2016). Experimental validation of a EnergyPlus model: Application of a multi-storey naturally ventilated double skin façade. Energy and Buildings, 118, 27-36.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Y. Azmy, N., & E. Ashmawy, R. (2018). Effect of the Window Position in the Building Envelope on Energy Consumption. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1861-1868. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11174

    Received date: 2018-04-06

    Accepted date: 2018-07-31

    Published date: 2018-08-22