Multi-objective optimization considering cost, emission and loss objectives using PSO and fuzzy approach

  • Authors

    • S Surender Reddy Woosong University
    2018-07-20
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11203
  • Emission, Evolutionary Algorithm, Fuzzy Approach, Operating Cost, Transmission Loss.

  • Abstract

    A novel approach to solve multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem which aims at minimizing fuel cost, emission release and real power loss of the system simultaneously has been proposed in this paper. Conventional minimum cost operation cannot be the only basis for generation dispatch; emission release minimization and loss minimization must also be taken care of. Power system must be operated in such a way that both active and reactive powers are optimized simultaneously. Reactive powers should be optimized to provide better volt-age profile as well as to reduce system losses. In this paper, the proposed multi-objective optimal power flow (MO-OPF) problem is solved using particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Fuzzy satisfaction maximization approach. In this paper, it is assumed that the decision maker has imprecise or fuzzy goals of satisfying all the objectives, and the proposed problem is thus formulated as a fuzzy satisfaction maximization problem which is basically a min-max problem. It is an efficient technique to obtain trade-off solution for the proposed optimization problem. The MO-OPF problem is tested on IEEE 30 bus, 6 generator system. The obtained results are found to be effective for the MO-OPF problem.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] J.B. Park, K.S. Lee, J.R. Shin, K.Y. Lee, “A Particle Swarm Optimization for Economic Dispatch with Non-smooth Cost Functionsâ€, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 20, no.1, (2005), pp 34- 42. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2004.831275.

      [2] Z.L. Gaing, “Particle Swarm Optimization to Solving the Economic Dispatch Considering the Generator Constraintsâ€, IEEE Tans. on Power Systems, vol. 18, no. 3, (2003), pp. 1187-1195. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2003.814889.

      [3] A.A. El-Keib, H. Ma, J.L. Hart, “Economic dispatch in view of the Clean Air Act of 1990â€, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 9, no. 2, (1994), pp. 972-978. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.317648.

      [4] S.S. Reddy, B.K. Panigrahi, “Fuzzified multi-objective particle swarm optimization for the solution of economic and emission dispatch problemâ€, International Journal of Power and Energy Conversion, vol. 8, no. 3, (2017), pp. 276-294. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPEC.2017.084916.

      [5] E.D. Manteaw, N.A. Odero, “Multi-Objective Environmental/Economic Dispatch Solution Using ABC_PSO Hybrid Algorithmâ€, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 2, no. 12, (2012), pp. 1-7.

      [6] S. Sivanagaraju, Ch.V. Suresh, K. Srikumar, A.V. Naresh Babu, “Multi-Objective Optimization using NDSPSO with Cost, Emission and Loss Objectivesâ€, Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Power Systems, Energy, Environment, (2014), pp. 57-62.

      [7] S.S. Reddy, P.R. Bijwe, “Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Using Efficient Evolutionary Algorithmâ€, International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, (2017), pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2016-0233.

      [8] Z. Bo, C. Yi-jia, “Multiple objective particle swarm optimization technique for economic load dispatchâ€, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, vol. 6A, no. 5, (2005), pp. 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.A0420.

      [9] K. Teeparthi, D.M.V. Kumar, “Multi-objective hybrid PSO-APO algorithm based security constrained optimal power flow with wind and thermal generatorsâ€, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, (2017), pp. 411-426.

      [10] J. Hazra, A.K. Sinha, “A multi-objective optimal power flow using particle swarm optimizationâ€, European Transactions on Electrical Power, vol. 21, no. 1, (2011), pp. 1028-1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.494.

      [11] B. Taheri, G. Aghajani, M. Sedaghat, “Economic dispatch in a power system considering environmental pollution using a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on the Pareto criterion and fuzzy logicâ€, International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, (2017), pp. 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-017-0233-9.

      [12] M. Balasubbareddy, S. Sivanagaraju, C.V. Suresh, “Multi-objective optimization in the presence of practical constraints using non-dominated sorting hybrid cuckoo search algorithmâ€, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, (2015), pp. 603-615.

      [13] N. Singh, Y. Kumar, “Multi-objective Economic Load Dispatch Problem Solved by New PSOâ€, Advances in Electrical Engineering, vol. 2015, (2015), pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536040.

      [14] K.K. Mandal, S. Mandal, B. Bhattacharya, N. Chakraborty, “Non-convex emission constrained economic dispatch using a new self-adaptive particle swarm optimization techniqueâ€, Applied Soft Computing, vol. 28, no. C, (2015), pp. 188-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.033.

      [15] B. Taheri, G. Aghajani, M. Sedaghat, “Economic dispatch in a power system considering environmental pollution using a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on the Pareto criterion and fuzzy logicâ€, International Journal of Energy Environmental Engineering, vol. 8, (2017), pp. 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-017-0233-9.

      [16] K. Rajalashmi, S.U. Prabha, “Hybrid Swarm Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimal Power Flow Problemâ€, Circuits and Systems, vol. 7, (2016), pp. 3589-3603. https://doi.org/10.4236/cs.2016.711304.

      [17] S.S. Parihar, N. Malik, “Multi-objective optimization with non-convex cost functions using fuzzy mechanism based continuous genetic algorithmâ€, 4th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Electronics, Mathura, (2017), pp. 457-462. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPCON.2017.8251091.

      [18] P. Dutta, A.K. Sinha, “Environmental Economic dispatch constrained by voltage stability using PSOâ€, International conference proceedings, IEEE ICIT, December 12-15, (2006), pp 1879-1884.

      [19] S.S. Reddy, P.R.Bijwe, “Efficiency Improvements in Meta-Heuristic Algorithms to Solve the Optimal Power Flow Problemâ€, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 82, pp. 288-302, Nov. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.028.

      [20] S.S. Reddy, P.R. Bijwe, A.R. Abhyankar, “Faster Evolutionary Algorithm Based Optimal Power Flow using Incremental Power Flow Modelâ€, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 54, (2014), pp. 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.019.

      [21] M.S. Kumari, “Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Solution Using Evolutionary Computation Techniquesâ€, (2017), Ph.D Thesis.

      [22] M.S. Kumari, S. Maheswarapu, “Enhanced Genetic Algorithm based computation technique for multi-objective Optimal Power Flow solutionâ€, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 32, no. 6, (2010), pp. 736-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.010.

      [23] K. Deb, Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary algorithms, John Wiley and Sons, 2001.

      [24] M.A. Abido, Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 24, no. 7, (2002), pp. 563-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-0615(01)00067-9.

      [25] P. Dutta, A.K. Sinha, “Voltage Stability Constrained Multi-obj ective Optimal Power Flow using Particle Swarm Optimizationâ€, First International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, Peradeniya, (2006), pp. 161-166.

      [26] P. Dutta, A.K. Sinha, “Environmental Economic dispatch constrained by voltage stability using PSOâ€, International conference proceedings, IEEE ICIT, December 12-15, (2006), pp 1879-1884.

      [27] S.S. Reddy, Ch.S. Rathnam, “Optimal Power Flow using Glowworm Swarm Optimizationâ€, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 80, (2016), pp. 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.01.036.

      [28] S.S. Reddy, “Clustered adaptive teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm for solving the optimal generation scheduling problemâ€, Electrical Engineering, vol. 100, no. 1, (2018), pp. 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-017-0508-4.

      [29] Power System Test Case Archive, 2007. [Online].Available: https://www2.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/pf30/pg_tca30bus.htm.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Surender Reddy, S. (2018). Multi-objective optimization considering cost, emission and loss objectives using PSO and fuzzy approach. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1552-1557. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11203

    Received date: 2018-04-06

    Accepted date: 2018-07-12

    Published date: 2018-07-20