Tracking self-assembly morphology of cationic peptide analogues using turbidimetric- potentiometric titration

  • Authors

    • Huey Ling Tan Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Malaysia
    • Ying Pei Lim Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Malaysia
    • Mohomad Sufian So’aib Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Malaysia
    2018-06-23
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11403
  • Amphiphilic Peptides, β-Sheet, Secondary Structure, Spontaneous Self-Assembly, Turbidimetric Titration

  • Abstract

    Peptide amphiphiles are promising molecular materials for drug delivery systems and regenerative medicine through formation of well-ordered nanostructures. Rationally designed self-associating synthetic peptide analogues containing arginine (FEFEFRFR) and lysine (FEFEFKFK) were studied to understand the effect of pH and side chain interactions and its influence on the resulting nanostructure formation. Changes in structural conformation in bulk were followed by turbidimetric-potentiometric titrations with pH ranges from 4 to 11 and 4 to 12.6 for FEFEFKFK and FEFEFRFR respectively. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to determine the secondary structure of the peptides while Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) was employed to study the morphology and dimension of higher order structures at various pH. Turbidity results showed that both FEFEFKFK and FEFEFRFR displayed higher turbidity level when their side chains were neutralized, in which FEFEFRFR showed higher turbidity level when arginine was neutralized. Both peptides exhibited similar self-assembly behavior in solution which mainly adopted antiparallel β-sheets conformation with spherical structures of different micro-metre size when there is a net charge of +2 or -2. FEFEFKFK was also found to form concaved disks and beads-on-a-string arrangement at pH 4. Both the peptide analogues were capable of forming smaller aggregates in a network of spherical structure at nanoscale when the net charge was near zero. This study ultimately provides a better understanding of predicting morphology and size of surface functional modification of self-assembled polypeptides.

     

     


  • References

    1. [1] Aline FM, Alberto S (2010) Engineering peptide based biomaterials: structure, properties and application. Chimica Oggi: Chemistry Today 28(1), 34-38.

      [2] Shamsudeen H, Tan HL (2015) Self-assembly of peptide amphiphiles: molecularly engineered bionanomaterials. Advanced Materials Research 1113, 586-593. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1113.586.

      [3] Zhang S and Altman M (1991) Peptide self-assembly in functional polymer science and engineering. Reactive and Functional Polymers 41, 91-102 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(99)00031-0.

      [4] Vauthey S, Steve S, Gong H, Watson N, Zhang S (2002) Molecular self-assembly of surfactant-like peptides to form nanotubes and nanovesicles. PNAS 99(8), 5355-5360. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072089599.

      [5] Sadatmousavi P, Mamo T, Chen P (2012) Diethylene glycol functionalized self-assembling peptides nanofibers and their hydrophobic drug delivery potential. Acta Biomater 8(9), 3241-3250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.021.

      [6] Koki M, McElheny D, Tereshko V, Hilyard A, Gawlak G, Yan S, Koide A, Koide S (2006) Atomic structures of peptide self-assembly mimics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(47), 17753–17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606690103.

      [7] Yan XH, He Q, Wang K, Duan L, Cui Y, Li J (2007) Transition of cationic dipeptide nanotubes into vesicles and oligonucleotide delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed 46, 2431-2434. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200603387.

      [8] Vauthey S, Santoso S, Gong H, Watson N, Zhang SG (2002) Molecular self-assembly of surfactant-line peptides to form nanotubes and nanovesicles. PNAS 99(8), 5355-5360. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072089599.

      [9] Zhang SG, Zhao XJ (2004) Design of molecular biological materials using peptide motifs. J Mater Chem 14, 2082-2086. https://doi.org/10.1039/b406136e.

      [10] Hong Y, Legge RL, Zhang S, Chen P (2003) Effect of amino acid sequence and pH on nanofiber formation of self-assembling peptides EAK16-II and EAK16-IV. Biomacromolecules 4(5), 1433-1442. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0341374.

      [11] Kyle S, Aggeli A, Ingham E, McPherson MJ (2009) Production of self-assembling biomaterials for tissue engineering. Trends in Biotechnology 27(7), 423-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.04.002.

      [12] Tigerstrom A, Schwarz F, Karlsson G, Okvist M, Alvarez-Rua C Maeder D, Robb FT, Sjolin L (2004) Effects of a novel disulfide bond and engineered electrostatic interactions on the thermostability of azurin. Biochemistry 43(39), 12563–12574. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi048926x.

      [13] Northey JG, Di Nardo AA, Davidson AR (2002) hydrophobic core packing in the SH3 domain folding transition state. Nat Struct Biol 9(2), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb748.

      [14] Sirram S, Govindan R, Sun-Gu L (2013) Study on the effect of surface lysine to arginine mutagenesis on protein stability and structure using green fluorescent protein. PLoS ONE 7(7), e40410.

      [15] Tan HL, Curtis R (2017) Inter-relation of surface tension and optical turbidity in self-assembled peptide amphiphiles. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry 7(1), 1913-1920.

      [16] Kumar S, Tsai C-J, Nussinov R (2000) Factors enhancing protein thermostability. Protein Eng 13(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/13.3.179.

      [17] Strickler SS, Gribenko AV, Gribenko AV, Keiffer TR, Tomlinson J, Reihle T, Loladze VV, Makhatadze GI (2006) Protein stability and surface electrostatics: a charged relationship. Biochemistry 45(9), 2761–2766. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0600143.

      [18] J. Kong, S. Yu (2007) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of protein secondary structures. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 39(8), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7270.2007.00320.x.

      [19] Haris P I, Severcan F (1999) FTIR spectroscopic characterisation of protein structure in aqueous and non-aqueous media. J Mol Catal B: Enzym, 7(1-4) 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1177(99)00030-2.

      [20] Bozkurt O, Haman Bayari S, Severcan M, Krafft C, Popp J, Severcan F (2012) Structural alterations in rat liver proteins due to streptozotocin-induced diabetes and the recovery effect of selenium: fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy and neural network study. J Biomed Opt 17(7), 0760231–0760238. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.7.076023.

      [21] Sokalingam S, Raghunathan G, Soundrarajan N, Lee SG (2012) A study on the effect of surface lysine to arginine mutagenesis on protein stability and structure using green fluorescent protein. PLoS ONE 7(7), e40410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040410.

      [22] Dado GP, Gellman SH (1994) Intermolecular hydrogen bonding in derivatives of beta-alanine and gamma-amino buryric-acid model studies for the folding of unnatural polypeptide backbones. J Am Chem Soc 116, 1054-1062. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00082a029.

      [23] Dinesh B, Vinaya V, Raghothama S, Balaram P (2013) C12-helix development in (αγ) n sequences-spectroscopic characterisation of Boc-[Aib-γ4 (R) Val]-OMe oligomers. Eur J Org Chem 17, 3590-3596. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201300264.

      [24] Piasek Z, Urbanski T (1962) the infrared absorption spectrum and structure of urea. Bulletin De L’academie Polonaise Des Sciences 10(3), 113-120.

      [25] Mu Q, Jang G, Zhou H, Fourches D, Tropsha A, Yan B (2014) Chemical basis of interactions between engineered nanoparticles and biological systems. Chem Rev 114(15), 7740-7781. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400295a.

      [26] Borders J, Broadwater JA, Bekeny PA, Salmon JE, Lee AS (1994) A structural role for arginine in proteins: Multiple hydrogen bonds to backbone carbonyl oxygens. Protein Sci 3, 541-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560030402.

      [27] Musafia B, Buchner V, Arad D (1995) Complex salt bridges in proteins: Statistical analysis of structure and function. J Mol Biol 254, 761-770. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1995.0653.

      [28] Mandal D, Shirazi AN, Parang K (2014) Self-assembly of peptides to nanostructures. Org Biomol Chem 12(22), 3544-3561. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4OB00447G.

      [29] Sokalingam S, Raghunathan G, Soundrarajan N, Lee SG (2012) A study on the effect of surface lysine to arginine mutagenesis on protein stability and structure using green fluorescent protein. PLoS ONE 7(7), e40410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040410.

      [30] Turunen O, Vuorio M, Fenel F, Leisola M (2002) Engineering of multiple arginines into the Ser/Thr surface of Trichoderma ressei endo-1,4-b-xylanase II increases the thermotolerance and shifts the pH optimum towards alkaline pH. Protein Eng 15, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/15.2.141.

      [31] Bemporad F, Calloni G, Campioni S, Plakoutsi G, Taddei N, Chiti F (2006) Sequence and structural determinants of amyloid fibril formation. Acc Chem Res 39(9), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar050067x.

      [32] C. H. Gorbitz (2006) the structure of nanotubes formed by diphenylalanine, the core recognition motif of alzheimer’s beta-amyloid polypeptide. Chem Commun 22, 2332–2334. https://doi.org/10.1039/B603080G.

      [33] Scelsi A, Bochicchio B, Smith A, Saiani A, Pepe A (2015) Nanospheres from the self-assembly of an elastin-inspired triblock peptide. RSC Adv 5, 95007-95103. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA21182D.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Ling Tan, H., Pei Lim, Y., & Sufian So’aib, M. (2018). Tracking self-assembly morphology of cationic peptide analogues using turbidimetric- potentiometric titration. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1067-1071. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11403

    Received date: 2018-04-11

    Accepted date: 2018-05-24

    Published date: 2018-06-23