Comparison of Different MPPT Algorithms for PV System

  • Authors

    • Richa Verma
    • B Bhargav
    • Srinivasa Varma P
    2018-02-09
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.8.11539
  • Maximum power point tracking, photovoltaic (PV) system. Single-ended primary inductor (SEPIC) converter

  • Abstract

    This paper helps us analyze three different MPPT techniques like Perturb and Observe, Incremental Conductance and Particle Swarm Optimization method. As the output characteristic depends on temperature and irradiance, therefore the maximum power point (MPPT) is not always constant. Hence it is necessary to ensure that the PV panel is operating at its maximum power point. There are many different MPPT techniques but, the confusion lies in selecting which MPPT technique is best as every algorithm has its own merit and demerit. In order to extract maximum power from PV arrangement, PSO algorithm is proposed. Algorithms are implemented using the DC-DC converter as well as SEPI converter. Results of simulations are presented in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of PSO algorithm, when compared to Perturb and Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC). To simulate the proposed system MATLAB/SIMULINK power system tool box is used.

     

  • References

    1. [1] MakarandLokhande,MukesPatel, “MATLAB/Simulink Model of Solar PV Module and MPPT Algorithmâ€, National Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering and Technology, May. 2011. 3

      [2] Blorfan, D. Flieller, P. Wira, G. Sturtzer, J. Merckle, “A New Ap-proach for Modeling the Photovoltaic Cell Using Orcad Comparing With the Model Done in Matlabâ€,International Review on Modeling and Simulations Vol. 3, N. 5, PP 948-954, Oct. 2010. 5.

      [3] 10 Rahul Suryavanshi, Diwakar R. Joshi, Suresh H. Jangamshetti “PSO and P&O based MPPT Technique for SPV Panel under Varying Atmospheric Conditions†International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 1, Issue 3, March 2012.

      [4] Dolara, R. Faranda, S. Leva, “Energy Comparison of Seven MPPT Techniques for PV Systemsâ€. Electromagnetic Analysis & Applications, 2009, 3: 152-162 doi:10.4236/jemaa.2009.13024 Published Online September 2009.

      [5] I.Felice Browni1, U.SelvamalarBeaulah Ponrani2 1PG Scholar, 2Assistant Professor, Department of EEE,Velammal Engineering College, Chennai (India) “Comparison Of Pso And De Algorithm Based Mppt Algorithm For Solar Energy System†International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ISSN- 2321-2055 (E) http://www.arresearchpublication.com IJEEE, Volume 07, Issue 01, Jan- June 2015.

      [6] Takayoshi Kamejima1 , VanxayPhimmasone 1 , Yuta Kondo1 , Masafumi Miyatake2 (Sophia Univ.) 1Graduate School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sophia University, Japan 2Department of Engineering and Applied Science, Sophia University,Japan E-mail: t-kameji@sophia.ac.jp â€The Optimization of Control Parameters of PSO based MPPT for Photovoltaics†IEEE PEDS 2011, Singapore, 5 - 8 December 2011.

      [7] Ramdan B. A. Koad, Ahmed. F. Zobaa R “Comparison between the Conventional Methods and PSO Based MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Systems†World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Electronics and Communication Engineering Vol:8, No:4, 2014.

      [8] N. Boutasseta Electrical Engineering Department BadjiMokhtar - Annaba University B.P.12, Annaba, 23000, Algeria “PSO-PI based Control of Photovoltaic Arrays†International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 888)Volume 48– No.17, June 2012.


      [9] Converter Henry Shu-Hung Chung, Member, IEEE, K. K. Tse, Member, IEEE, S. Y. Ron Hui, Fellow, IEEE, C. M. Mok, and M. T. Ho, Student Member, IEEE “A Novel Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for Solar Panels Using a SEPIC or Cuk†IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 18, NO. 3, MAY 2003 717.

      [10] S. J. Chiang, Hsin-Jang Shieh, Member, IEEE, and Ming-Chieh Chen “Modeling and Control of PV TABLE-2ChargerSystemWith SEPIC Converter†IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 56, NO. 11 NOVEMBER 2009.

      [11] Ismail, Senior Member, IEEE, Ahmad J. Sabzali, Member, IEEE, and Abbas IEEE A. Fardoun, Senior Member Mustafa A. Al-Saffar Member, IEEE, Esam H., IEEE “An Improved Topology of SEPIC Converter With Reduced Output Voltage Ripple†TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 23, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2008 2377

      [12] Jingying Hu, Student Member, IEEE, Anthony D. Sagneri, Student Member, IEEE, Juan M. Rivas, Member, IEEE, Yehui Han, Member, IEEE, Seth M. Davis, and David J. Perreault, Senior Member, IEEE “High-Frequency Resonant SEPIC Converter With Wide Input and Output Voltage Rangesâ€.IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 27, NO. 1, JANUARY 2012 189.

      [13] K. M. Tsang and W. L. Chan†Fast Acting Regenerative DC Electronic Load Based on a SEPIC Converter†IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 27, NO. 1, JANUARY 2012 269.

      [14] Hyun-Lark Do†Soft-Switching SEPIC Converter With Ripple-Free Input Current†IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 27, NO. 6, JUNE 2012 2879.

      [15] 8. Jae-Won Yang and Hyun-Lark Do “Bridgeless SEPIC Converter. With a Ripple-Free Input Current†IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 28,NO.7,JULY2013.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Verma, R., Bhargav, B., & Varma P, S. (2018). Comparison of Different MPPT Algorithms for PV System. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(1.8), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.8.11539

    Received date: 2018-04-14

    Accepted date: 2018-04-14

    Published date: 2018-02-09