Practices of solidarity as a subject of intellectual traditions in Russia and the west

  • Authors

    • Vitaliy V. Kovalev
    • Yuriy G. Volkov
    • Anatoly V. Lubsky
    • Natalya K. Bineeva
    • Nona Z. Gubnelova
    2018-04-15
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.11601
  • Practices of Solidarity, Solidarity, Paradigm, Intellectual Tradition, Sobornost, Modernization, Solidarism, Stability, Corporate State, Religion.

  • Abstract

    This article attempts to make a comparative analysis of the assessment of solidarity practices in the intellectual tradition in Russia and the West. In the foreign intellectual tradition, four paradigms are highlighted in the study of solidarity practices: sociological, philosophical, ideological and religious. The Russian intellectual tradition includes religious and ideological paradigms. In the West, sociology and philosophies have played a major role in the study of solidarity practices, in which scientific knowledge or normative knowledge has been developed and used to put social reality under control. In the Russian intellectual tradition, practices of solidarity have been given a moral or axiological dimension.

     

  • References

    1. [1] The article is written within the framework of State Mission (Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation), project â„– 28.3486.2017/ PCh "Civil patriotism in the formation and development of solidarity practices in the Southof Russia: resource potential and conditions for its utilization".

      [2] Hofstede G. National cultures in four dimensions. A Research-based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations // International Studies of Management & Organization. 1983. Vol. XIII. N 1–2. P. 60; Dubitskaya V.P., Tararukhina M.I. Byt li Rossii Amerikoy? Rossiyskoye issledovaniye upravlencheskoy kultury po metodike Geert Hofstede // Sociological journal. 2010. № 4. P. 44-45.

      [3] European Year of Citizenship through Education. 2005. Learning and living democracy. Concept Paper. Ad Hoc Committee of Experts for the European Year of Citizenship through Education (CAHCIT) // Council of Europe. Strasbourg, 29 November 2004. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.nefmi.gov.hu/letolt/nemzet/eu/Concept%20paper%20for%20the%20 European%20Year%20of%20Citizenship%20through%20Education.pdf.

      [4] Dean J. Solidarity of strangers. Berkeley: University of California press, 1996.

      [5] Social Solidarity // New Connections to Classical and Contemporary. Social Theory: Re-wiered. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://routledgesoc.com/category/profile-tags/social-solidarity.

      [6] Gofman A.B. Solidarnost ili pravila, Durkheim ili Hayek? O dvukh formakh sotsialnoy integratsii // Sociological yearbook. 2012: Collection of scientific works / ed. by N.E. Pokrovsky, D.V. Yefremenko. Moscow: INION RAN; Department of General Sociology NRU HSE, 2013. P. 100.

      [7] Blais M.-C. La solidarité: Histoire d’une idée. P.: Gallimard, 2007.

      [8] Gofman A.B. Solidarnost ili pravila, Durkheim ili Hayek? O dvukh formakh sotsialnoy integratsii. P. 107.

      [9] Sendrov V.A. Solidarizm – tretiy put Yevropy // Portret solidarizma: Idei i lyudi / Sost. V.A. Senderov. Moscow: Posev, 2007. P. 302-303.

      [10] Juul S. Solidarity and social cohesion in late modernity: A question of recognition, justice and judgment in situation // European journal of social theory. London, 2010. Vol. 13. N two. P. 253–269.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    V. Kovalev, V., G. Volkov, Y., V. Lubsky, A., K. Bineeva, N., & Z. Gubnelova, N. (2018). Practices of solidarity as a subject of intellectual traditions in Russia and the west. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.13), 71-74. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.11601

    Received date: 2018-04-15

    Accepted date: 2018-04-15

    Published date: 2018-04-15