Social transformations in bifurcation fields of self-organizing systems: methodological and conceptual aspects

  • Authors

    • Vitaly V. Popov
    • Oksana A. Muzyka
    • Tatyana D. Skudnova
    • Svetlana A. Petrushenko
    • Tatyana P. Agafonova
    • Irina D. Lichman
    2018-04-15
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.11681
  • Methodology, Social Transformations, Non-Linear Development, Social Actor, Self-Organizing Systems, Periods of Transit, Alternativeness, Bifurcation Field

  • Abstract

    The article considers different methodological approaches to studying the modern society undergoing a process of transformation. The authors stipulate that the modern society should be considered in its dynamics as a society of social transformations; expound on the need for a correct and adequate semantic formulation of significant issues of non-linear development of the society within the frameworks of the philosophy of science and the social philosophy; demonstrate different levels of application of the concepts and semantic representations in the research into social transformations at the level of complex systems; and reveal that in the study of social transformations within a transitional society it is appropriate to state that the social synergetics allows modelling some aspects of the creative practical activity of a cognizing social actor. Specifics of the development of social transformations in bifurcation fields in the context of non-linear development of the society are identified and discussed.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Popov V.V., Muzyka O.A., Maksimova S.I. Al'ternativistika v kontekste social'nogo razvitija (Alternativistics in the Context of Social Development). Eurasian Law Journal, 2017, no. 4(107), pp. 373–375.

      [2] Popov V.V., Muzyka O.A., Timofeenko V.A. Social'noe protivorechie v kontekste nelinejnyh processov (Social Contradiction in the Context of Non-linear Processes). Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovanij, 2017, no. 1–2, pp. 361–364.

      [3] Popov V.V., Muzyka O.A., Kiselev S.A. Koncepcija tranzitivnosti i transformacii obshhestva (The Concept of Transitivity and Transformation of Society). Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovanij, 2017, no. 1–2, pp. 365–368.

      [4] Simon H. Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. [In Russian]. Thesis, 1993, issue 3, pp. 16–38.

      [5] Sergeychik E.M. Filosofija istorii (The Philosophy of History).Saint Petersburg, 2002, 490 p.

      [6] Fedotova V.G. Menjajushhajasja social'nost': novye formy modernizacii i progressa (Changing Sociality: New Forms of Modernization and Progress). Moscow, 2010, 274 p.

      [7] Popov V.V., Kiselev S.A., Ukolov A.O. Social'nye Transformacii v Kontekste Social'nyh Processov (Social Transformations in the Context of Social Processes). Eurasian Law Journal: Philosophical Studies, 2016, no. 9(100), pp. 364–367.

      [8] Popov V.V., Muzyka O.A. Koncepcija tranzitivnosti v kontekste transformacii sociuma (The Concept of Transitiveness in the Context of Social Transformation). Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being, 2016, no. 5, pp. 121–130.

      [9] Popov V.V. Metodologicheskie osobennosti social'nogo protivorechija (Methodological Features of Social Contradictions). Humanities and Social Sciences in Europe: Achievements and Perspectives. Vol. 2. Vienna, 2013, pp. 215–218.

      [10] Popov V.V. Social'naja racional'nost' i global'nyj jevoljucionizm (Social Rationality and Global Evolutionism). European Applied Sciences, 2013, no. 7, Stuttgard, pp. 71–73.

      [11] Elizbarashvili E. The Attempt to Overcome Time Dynamic Theory in the Concept of Eternal Return. European Researcher, 2014, 5-1(74), pp. 837–841.

      [12] Hawking S., Penrose R. The Nature of Space and Time. Saint Petersburg, 2012, 156 p. [In Russian].

      [13] Klinkova J. Polarity, paralely a prieniky jazykovej komunikácie. Ed. by V. Patráš. Banská Bystrica: Belianum, 2014, 188 p.

      [14] Shah S., Ahmed A., Ahmad N. Role of Packaging in Consumer Buying Behavior. International Review of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2013, 1(2), pp. 35–41.

      [15] Davoudi SMM, Fartash K, Venera G. Zakirova, Asiya M. Belyalova, Rashad A. Kurbanov, Anna V. Boiarchuk, Zhanna M. Sizova (2018). Testing the Mediating Role of Open Innovation on the Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights and Organizational Performance: A Case of Science and Technology Park, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1359-1369.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    V. Popov, V., A. Muzyka, O., D. Skudnova, T., A. Petrushenko, S., P. Agafonova, T., & D. Lichman, I. (2018). Social transformations in bifurcation fields of self-organizing systems: methodological and conceptual aspects. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.13), 168-172. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.11681

    Received date: 2018-04-17

    Accepted date: 2018-04-17

    Published date: 2018-04-15