A Preference-Based Supervising of Virtual Machines in Cloud Environment
-
2018-04-25 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.24.12004 -
Resource Supervisor, Monitor, Preference factor, Scheduler. -
Abstract
Cloud Computing is a well-known technology in today’s world. A large number of users are benefited from the cloud services. The cloud computing must provide efficient service on time for customer satisfaction. So, prominent resource monitoring and scheduling techniques are needed. To achieve the customer satisfaction and to reduce the communication overhead, a method called Resource Supervisor (RS) is proposed. The proposed algorithm assigns the preference for the tasks having highest length, monitor the status of the resource and schedule the tasks to various resources quickly. The proposed method is implemented using Cloud Simulator, and experimental results are validated by comparing RS method with existing algorithms, which provides better outcomes and reduces the communication overhead.
Â
-
References
[1] S. Vadde and S. Ganesan, “Effect of fault in single load distribution with FIFO(first in, first out) back propagation of resultsâ€, IEEE Int. Conf. Electro Inf. Technol, pp. 804–810, 2016.
[2] M. A. Alworafi, A. Dhari, A. A. Al-Hashmi, A. B. Darem, and Suresha, “An improved SJF scheduling algorithm in cloud computing environmentâ€, Int. Conf. Electr. Electron. Commun. Comput. Optim. Tech. ICEECCOT 2016, pp. 208–212, 2017.
[3] A. Alnowiser, E. Aldhahri, and A. Alahmadi, “Enhanced weighted round robin (EWRR) scheduling with DVFS technology in cloudâ€, Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Comput. Intell. CSCI 2014, vol. 1, pp. 320–326, 2014.
[4] S. Ghanbari and M. Othman, “A priority based job scheduling algorithm in cloud computing,†Procedia Eng., vol. 50, pp. 778–785, 2012.
[5] Q. Yu, L. Chen, B. Li, and J. Li, “Ant colony optimization applied to web service compositions in cloud computingâ€, Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 41, pp. 18–27, 2015.
[6] G. J. Tu, M. K. Hansen, P. Kryger, and P. Ahrendt, “Automatic behaviour analysis system for honeybees using computer visionâ€, Comput. Electron. Agric, vol. 122, pp. 10–18, 2016.
[7] M. Lin, Z. Yao, and T. Huang, “A hybrid push protocol for resource monitoring in cloud computing platformsâ€, Optik (Stuttg), vol. 127, no. 4, 2016.
[8] R. Kaur, “Load Balancing in Cloud System using Max Min and Min Min Algorithmâ€, pp. 31–34, 2014.
[9] B. Kang and H. Choo, “A cluster-based decentralized job dispatching for the large-scale cloudâ€, Eurasip J. Wirel. Commun. Netw, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.
[10] M. Dhingra, J. Lakshmi, and S. K. Nandy, “Resource usage monitoring in cloudsâ€, IEEE/ACM Int. Work. Grid Comput., vol. 12, pp. 184–191, 2012.
[11] H. Chen, X. Fu, Z. Tang, and X. Zhu, “Resource Monitoring and Prediction in Cloud Computing Environmentsâ€, 3rd Int. Conf. Appl. Comput. Inf. Technol. Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Intell., pp. 288–292, 2015.
[12] N. Tapoglou and J. Mehnen, “Cloud-based Job Dispatching Using Multi-criteria Decision Makingâ€, Procedia CIRP, vol. 41, pp. 661–666, 2016.
[13] X. Ji, F. Zeng, and M. Lin, “Data transmission strategies for resource monitoring in cloud computing platformsâ€, Optik (Stuttg)., vol. 127, no. 16, pp. 6726–6734, 2016.
[14] M. R. Abid, K. Kaddouri, K. Smith, M. I. El Ouadghiri, and M. Gerndt, “Virtual machines’ load-balancing in inter-cloudsâ€, Int. Conf. Futur. Internet Things Cloud Work. W-FiCloud, pp. 109–116, 2016.
[15] V. C. Emeakaroha, I. Brandic, M. Maurer, and S. Dustdar, “Low Level Metrics to High Level SLAs-LoM2HiS Framework_Bridging the Gap Between Monitored Metrics and SLA Parameters in CLoud Environments.pdfâ€, pp. 48–54, 2010.
[16] N. Srinivasu, “a Dynamic Approach To Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing Using Genetic Algorithmâ€, vol. 85, no. 2, 2016.
[17] D. Atanasov and T. Ruskov, “Simulation of Cloud Computing Environments with CloudSimâ€, pp. 2–6, 2014.
[18] E. Meriam and N. Tabbane, “Dynamic Scheduling Protocol Based on Cost in Cloud Computingâ€, Glob. Summit Comput. Inf. Technol., pp. 15–20, 2016.
[19] L. Adhianto et al., “HPCTOOLKIT: Tools for performance analysis of optimized parallel programsâ€, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 685–701, 2010.
[20] D. Saxena, R. K. Chauhan, and R. Kait, “Dynamic Fair Priority Optimization Task Scheduling Algorithm in Cloud Computing: Concepts and Implementationsâ€, Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 41–48, 2016.
[21] T.Padmapriya and V.Saminadan, “Utility based Vertical Handoff Decision Model for LTE-A networksâ€, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, ISSN 1947-5500, vol.14, no.11, November 2016.
[22] M. Rajesh, Manikanthan, “ANNOYED REALM OUTLOOK TAXONOMY USING TWIN TRANSFER LEARNINGâ€, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, ISSN NO: 1314-3395, Vol-116, No. 21, Oct 2017.
[23] T.Padmapriya, S.V.Manikanthan, “An enhanced distributed evolved node-b architecture in 5G tele-communications network†, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.8.10419, ISSN NO:2227-524X, Vol-7, No.2.9(2018)
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Ezhilarasi, B., Padmakumari, P., & Umamakeswari, A. (2018). A Preference-Based Supervising of Virtual Machines in Cloud Environment. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.24), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.24.12004Received date: 2018-04-24
Accepted date: 2018-04-24
Published date: 2018-04-25