A Formal Protocol to Conduct Usability Heuristic Evaluations in the Context of the Software Development Process
-
2018-05-16 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12874 -
assessment protocol, heuristic evaluation, Human-Computer Interaction, usability evaluation methods, usability principles. -
Abstract
Heuristic evaluation is one of the most used techniques to evaluate the level of usability of a software product. In this research, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the recent studies which report the use of this method in the context of a software development process. The purpose was to identify the specific way in which each author performs this usability evaluation method, in order to propose a formal protocol. After an indeed examination of these studies, we have determined there are several differences in the way this technique is conducted according to the literature. There is no agreement about the number of inspectors that should participate, the usability principles that should be used, the profile of the specialists who must be part of the assessment team, or the evaluation process that should be followed. This work highlights the available settings and a detailed procedure to perform a heuristic evaluation in the domain of software products.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] Davids MR, Chikte U, Grimmer-Somers K, Halperin ML, “Usability testing of a multimedia e-learning resource for electrolyte and acid-base disordersâ€, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 45, no. 2, 2014, pp. 367-381.
[2] Desurvire H & Wiberg C, “Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: The next iterationâ€, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International 2009), 2009, pp. 557-566.
[3] DÃaz J, Rusu C & Collazos CA, “Experimental validation of a set of cultural-oriented usability heuristics: e-commerce websites evaluationâ€, Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 50, 2017, pp. 160-178.
[4] Fernandez A, Insfran E & Abrahão S, “Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping studyâ€, Information and Software Technology, vol. 53, no. 8, 2011, pp. 789-817.
[5] Hermawati S & Lawson G, “Establishing usability heuristics for heuristics evaluation in a specific domain: Is there a consensus?â€, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 56, 2016, pp. 34-51.
[6] Holzinger A, “Usability engineering methods for software developersâ€, Communications of the ACM, vol. 48, no. 1, 2005, pp. 71-74.
[7] Hurtado N, Ruiz M, Orta E & Torres J, “Using simulation to aid decision making in managing the usability evaluation processâ€, Information and Software Technology, vol. 57, no. 1, 2015, pp. 509-526.
[8] Inostroza R, Rusu C, Roncagliolo S, Rusu V & Collazos CA, “Developing SMASH: A set of SMArtphone's uSability Heuristicsâ€, Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 43, 2016, pp. 40-52.
[9] Isbandiputra IN, Santoso HB & Hasibuan ZA, “Usability evaluation of Indonesia open educational resources using multi-methodsâ€, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 12, 2017, pp. 3272-3276.
[10] ISO, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (vdts), -- Part 11: Guidance of usability, ISO Std. 9241-11:1998, International Organization for Standardization, 1998.
[11] ISO, Software engineering – Product quality – Part 1: Quality model, ISO Std. 9126-1:2001, International Organization for Standardization, 2001.
[12] Ivory MY & Hearst MA, “The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfacesâ€, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 33, no. 4, 2001, pp. 470-516.
[13] Nagpal R, Mehrotra D & Bhatia PK, “Analytical modelling approach to measure the usability of websiteâ€, International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, vol. 10, no. 5, 2016, pp. 125-142.
[14] Nielsen J, 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design, 1995, available online:
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
[15] Nielsen J, Usability engineering, 1st ed., San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 1993.
[16] Nielsen J, “Usability inspection methodsâ€, Proceedings of the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’94), 1994, pp. 413-414.
[17] Paz F, Paz FA & Pow-Sang JA, “Experimental case study of new usability heuristicsâ€, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International 2015), 2015, pp. 212-223.
[18] Paz F, Paz FA, Villanueva D & Pow-Sang JA, “Heuristic evaluation as a complement to usability testing: A case study in web domainâ€, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG 2015), 2015, pp. 546-551.
[19] Paz F & Pow-Sang JA, “A systematic mapping review of usability evaluation methods for software development processâ€, International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, vol. 10, no. 1, 2016, pp. 165-178.
[20] Paz F & Pow-Sang JA, “Current trends in usability evaluation methods: A systematic reviewâ€, Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Software Engineering & Its Applications (ASEA 2014), 2014, pp. 11-15.
[21] Paz F, Villanueva D, Rusu C, Roncagliolo S & Pow-Sang JA, “Experimental evaluation of usability heuristicsâ€, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG 2013), 2013, pp. 119-126.
[22] Ten AC, Paz F & Pow-Sang JA, “A framework for the evaluation of user experience in information-driven websitesâ€, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 12 (special issue 5), 2017, pp. 7093-7097.
[23] Whitefield A, Wilson F & Dowell J, “A framework for human factors evaluationâ€, Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, 1991, pp. 65-79.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Paz, F., A. Paz, F., Antonio Pow-Sang, J., & Collazos, C. (2018). A Formal Protocol to Conduct Usability Heuristic Evaluations in the Context of the Software Development Process. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.28), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12874Received date: 2018-05-16
Accepted date: 2018-05-16
Published date: 2018-05-16