Implementing Quick Response Manufacturing to Improve Delivery Performance in an ETO Company
-
2018-05-16 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12879 -
Quick Response Manufacturing, engineer-to-order, case study, utilization, lead time -
Abstract
As the pressure is increasing to compete with others to get customer orders in the global market, companies are struggling to build up competitive advantages that are hard to imitate. The trend shows more and more customers demand faster product delivery in the last decade. The Quick Response Manufacturing (QRM) approach provides significant benefits to engineer-to-order (ETO) companies through its focus on lead time reduction. A precision parts manufacturer was selected as case study to what extent QRM is a suitable solution to improve the delivery performance. This paper describes the implementation of the QRM concepts and illustrates how they were deciphered into practices that streamline the process across the organization. The study measures the effectiveness of the QRM framework through its ability to achieve better performance through concurrently reducing manufacturing critical-path time, lowering capacity utilization level and increasing throughput.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] Bertrand, JWM, & Muntslag, DR (1993), Production control in engineer-to-order firms. International Journal of Production Economics 30-31, 3-22.
[2] Stalk, GJr (1988), Time-The Next Source of Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review July-August, 41-51.
[3] Hendry, C (2010), Product customization: an empirical study of competitive advantage and repeat business. International Journal of Production Research 48(13), 3845-3865.
[4] Suri, R (1998), Quick Response Manufacturing: A Company-wide Approach to Reducing Lead Time. New York, NY: Productivity Press.
[5] Suri, R (2010), It's About Time. The Competitive Advantage of Quick Response Manufacturing. New York, NY: Productivity Press.
[6] Nambiar, AN (2010, March), Modern Manufacturing Paradigms – A Comparison. Paper presented at the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong.
[7] Amaro, G, Hendry, L, & Kingsman, B (1999), Competitive advantage, customization and a new taxonomy for non make-to-stock companies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19(4), 349-371.
[8] Knol, RH (2012), Using QRM to improve delivery performance at Larsen Premium Precision Parts: A case study to investigate the usability of QRM (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Groningen, Netherlands.
[9] Lampel, J, & Mintzberg, H (1996), Customizing customization. Sloan Management Review 38, 21–30.
[10] Gupta, D, & Benjaafar, S (2004), Make-to-order, make-to-stock, or delay product differentiation? A common framework for modeling and analysis. IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers) 36(6), 529-546.
[11] Altendorfer, K, & Jodlbauer, H (2011), An analytical model for service level and tardiness in a single machine MTO production system. International Journal of Production Research 49(7), 1827–1850.
[12] Hopp, WJ, & Spearman, ML (2008), Factory Physics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
[13] New, CC (1977), Managing the manufacture of complex products: coordinating multicomponent assembly. London: Business books communica europe.
[14] Muntslag, DR (1993), Managing customer order driven engineering : an interdisciplinary and design oriented approach. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
[15] Gunasekaran, A (1999), Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics 62, 87-105.
[16] Filho, MG, & Saes, EV (2013), From time-based competition (TBC) to quick response manufacturing (QRM): the evolution of research aimed at lead time reduction. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 64(5), 1177-1191.
[17] Pyrek, R (2010), Quick response manufacturing description. Tarnow Research Papers Collection 2(16), 109-115.
[18] Harding, L (2002), QRM – An Enabler on the Road to Agility? Quick Response Manufacturing – Part 1. Control, May, 20-22.
[19] Uzair, KM (2001), Development of a Framework for Comparing Performance Improvement Programs (Unpublished master’s thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States.
[20] Suri, R (2011), Beyond Lean: It’s About Time! Technical Report. Center for Quick Response Manufacturing. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
[21] Suri, R (2014), MCT: Quick Reference Guide. Madison. Wisconsin: Author.
[22] Bong, CS, Chong, KE, & How, WC (2016, September), Job shop material control based on the principles of quick response manufacturing. IDECON 2016. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Design and Concurrent Engineering, Langkawi, Malaysia. Melaka: Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.
[23] Bong, CS, & Chong, KE (2017, July), Applying quick response manufacturing to exploit variability and reduce lead time in the job shops. ISoRIS 2017. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Research in Innovation and Sustainability. Malacca, Malaysia.
[24] Lödding, H (2013), Handbook of Manufacturing Control : Fundamentals, Description, Configuration. New York: Springer.
[25] Deros, BM, Yusof, SM. & Salleh, AM (2006), A benchmarking implementation framework for automotive manufacturing SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal 13(4), 396-430.
[26] Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framework.
[27] Yusof, SM, & Aspinwall, E, (2000), A conceptual framework for TQM implementation for SMEs. The TQM Magazine 12(1), 31-36.
[28] Hopp, WJ (2008), Supply Chain Science, Chicago: Waveland Press.
[29] Hopp, WJ, and Spearman, ML (2001), Factory Physics (2nd Ed), New York: Irwin McGraw Hill.
[30] Wu, K, (2005, February), An Examination of Variability and Its Basic Properties for a Factory. IEEE Transactions On Semiconductor Manufacturing 18(1), 214–221.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Cheng Siong, B., & Kuan Eng, C. (2018). Implementing Quick Response Manufacturing to Improve Delivery Performance in an ETO Company. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.28), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12879Received date: 2018-05-16
Accepted date: 2018-05-16
Published date: 2018-05-16