On approach to the agreement of diverse stakeholders’ interests and goals in the governance

  • Authors

    • Zinaida K. Avdeeva
    • Svetlana V. Kovriga
    2018-05-16
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12902
  • Governance, Stakeholders, Decision Making, Collective Cognitive Map

  • Abstract

    The paper proposes the use of a collective cognitive map when solving governance problems as an effective means of diverse stakeholders’ interests and goals agreement. For compose such a map, an original approach is proposed that combines (1) the clarification and agreement of stakeholder representations on the governance problem using a number of criteria for improving the map quality and (2) the clusterization of similar stakeholder representations.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. ISACA, 2012.

      [2] Sørensen E. (2014), The metagovernance of public innovation in governance networks. Proceedings of the Policy & Politics conference: The challenges of leadership and collaboration in the 21st Century, available online: https://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/ sites/sps/migrated/documents/sorensonthemetagovernanceofpublicinnovation.pdf, , last visit: 19.04.2018.

      [3] Klijn E., Koppenjan J. (2014), Complexity in governance network theory. Complexity, Governance & Networks, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 61-70, available online: https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/ojs/index.php/ cgn/article/view/20, last visit: 19.04.2018.

      [4] Howick S. and other (2008), Building confidence in models for multiple audiences: the modelling cascade. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.183, No. 3, pp. 1068-1083.

      [5] Fuzzy cognitive maps advances in theory, methodologies, tools and applications. M. Glukas (Ed) (2010). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

      [6] Abramova N. and other (2010), Subject-formal methods based on cognitive maps and the problem of risk due to the human factor. Cognitive maps. IN-TECH, pp. 35-62.

      [7] Freeman R. and other (2010), Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge University.

      [8] Kjærgaard A., Blegind J. (2012), Using cognitive mapping to represent and share users’ interpretations in technology adaptation. Proceedings of the New frontiers in management and organizational cognition conference. National University of Ireland Maynooth.

      [9] Gray S.A., Zanre E. and Gray S. (2014), Fuzzy cognitive maps as representations of mental models and group beliefs: theoretical and technical issues. Fuzzy cognitive maps for applied sciences and engineering. E. Papageorgiou (Ed). Springer, pp. 29-48.

      [10] Garoui N., Jarboui A. (2012), Cognitive governance, cognitive mapping and cognitive conflicts: structural analysis with the MICMAC method, Cogent Economics & Finance, No. 2, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23322039. 2014.922893, last visit: 19.04.2018.

      [11] Abramova N., Kovriga S. (2011), The expert approach to verification at cognitive mapping of ill-structured situations. Proceedings of 18th IFAC World Congress, pp. 1997-2002.

      [12] Abramova N., Telitsyna T. (2013), An approach to analysis of expert estimation validity in cognitive mapping. Proceedings of the IFAC Conference on manufacturing modelling, management, and control (MIM2013), pp. 927- 932.

      [13] Burns J., Musa P. (2001) Structural validation of causal loop diagrams. Proceedings of the System dynamics society 19th annual conference, available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publi caton/241870937_Structural_Validation_of_Causal_Loop_Diagrams, last visit: 19.04.2018.

      [14] McLucas A. (2002) Improving causal mapping practice using the system dynamics “front-end†tool. Proceedings of the 20th International System Dynamics Conference.

      [15] Bouzdine-Chameeva T. (2007), The ANCOM-2 solution to support knowledge work. International Business Management, Vol.1 No. 2, pp. 12-19.

      [16] Abramova N. (2012), Interdisciplinary approach to verification in decision-making with formal methods. Handbook on psychology of decision-making: new research, K. Moore, N. Gonzalez (eds), Nova Science Pub Inc, pp. 89-111.

      [17] Mirkin B. (1996) Mathematical classification and clustering. Springer US.

      [18] Avdeeva Z., Kovriga S. (2014), On some principles and approaches to the construction of collective cognitive maps of situations. Large-Scale Systems Control, Vol. 52, pp. 37-68 (published in Russia).

      [19] Avdeeva Z., Kovriga S. (2017), The technology of the strategic goal-setting and monitoring of a system development on the basis of cognitive mapping. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 122, pp. 977-984.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    K. Avdeeva, Z., & V. Kovriga, S. (2018). On approach to the agreement of diverse stakeholders’ interests and goals in the governance. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.28), 160-163. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12902

    Received date: 2018-05-16

    Accepted date: 2018-05-16

    Published date: 2018-05-16