Park and ride study at light rapid transit (LRT) stations in Puchong, Malaysia

  • Authors

    • Boon Hoe GOH University of Nottingham (Malaysia Campus)
    • Phang Han Xiang University of Nottingham (Malaysia Campus)
    • Yuen Choon Wah University of Malaya
    • Kang Byung Gyoo University of Nottingham (Ningbo Campus)
    2018-08-21
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.13257
  • Light Rapid Transit (LRT), Mode Shift Model, Park-and-Ride, Regression Model.

  • This paper explored the factors influencing commuter’s preferences of using park and ride (PnR), by investigating their travel mode choice behaviour, and assessing the effectiveness of PnR facilities. Binary logistic regression (BLR) was used to develop travel mode choice model which provides insight into commuter’s considerations contributing to the utilisation of PnR facility. Several scenarios were modelled to investigate the effect of policy changes on commuter’s travel mode shift, which could be essential in formulating effective strategy to promote the use of PnR. The results revealed working trip, short travel time (< 15 mins) and medium long travel distance (1–3 km), were the main considerations of commuter using PnR. The significant influencing factors were determined as travel distance from origin to departing station and from arriving distance to destination, trip purpose, frequency of using light rapid transit (LRT), education level and occupation. 3 scenarios were modelled which revealed that provision of parking subsidy, medium travel distance (around 10 km) and medium travel time (around 20 mins) encouraged commuter to use PnR while travelling in group discourage the use of PnR.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat, (2013). Greater Kuala Lumpur/ Klang Valley Land Public Transport Master Plan. Kuala Lumpur.

      [2] Transport Statistic Malaysia 2015. (2016). Annual Transport Statistics. Putrajaya: Ministry of Transport Malaysia.

      [3] OrtuÌzar S, J. and Willumsen, L. (2001). Modelling transport. First ed. Chichester: J. Wiley.

      [4] He, B., He, W. and He, M. (2012). The Attitude and Preference of Traveler to the Park & Ride Facilities: a Case Study in Nanjing, China. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, pp.294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.102.

      [5] Lam, W., Holyak, N. and Lo, H. (2001). How Park-and-Ride Schemes Can Be Successful in Eastern Asia. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 127(2), pp.63-78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2001)127:2(63).

      [6] Turnbull, K., Pratt, R., Evans IV, J. and Levinson, H. (2016). Park-and-Ride/Pool -- Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 95. Washington: Transportation Research Board, Chapter 3.

      [7] Van der Waerden, P., de Bruin, M., Timmermans, H. and van Looon, P. (2011). Travelers’ Willingness to Use PnR Facilities and Additional Transport in the Context of Commuting and Shopping Trips to City Centers. Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting: 23-27.

      [8] Vincent, M. (2016). PnR: characteristics and demand forecasting. Land Transport New Zealand Research Report. Land Transport New Zealand.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    GOH, B. H., Han Xiang, P., Choon Wah, Y., & Byung Gyoo, K. (2018). Park and ride study at light rapid transit (LRT) stations in Puchong, Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1730-1734. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.13257