Technology Capability Perception & Sustaining Competitive Advantage Challenge for Private Higher Institution: a Review of Literature

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Private Institution of Higher Education Institutions (PvIHEs) in Malaysia is facing stiff competition from local and international institutions that offers various programmes.  The sustainability of PvIHEs is highly depending on several factors such as programmes offered, teaching and learning facilities, location, conducive environment, teaching staff and etc.  The focus of this paper was to review the literature review of sustaining competitive advantage factors for PvIHEs.  Furthermore in order to discover the technology capability perception of people on sustaining competitive advantage, an application of Theory of Planned Behaviour is applied.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour was used by various researchers in various setting.  The literature review of this study discloses the previous scholar on the related areas in sustaining competitive advantage, Theory of Planned Behavior and the perception of technology capability of a private higher education institution.

     



  • Keywords


    Literature Review; Technology Capability; Theory of Planned Behaviour

  • References


      [1] Ajzen I. From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognitions to behaviors. New York: Springer. 1985:11-39.

      [2] Wolf J, Egelhoff WG. Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: The case of cholesterol drugs. Strategic Management Journal. 2002;23(2):171-9.

      [3] Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal. 2004;25(3):201-21.

      [4] Elzarka S. Technology Use in Higher Education Instruction. 2012:141-.

      [5] MOHE. Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Education. 2013;27(1):1-268.

      [6] Bruniges M. Developing performance indicators for ICT use in education: Australia's Experience. 2003.

      [7] Malaysian Productivity C. Malaysia in the World Competitiveness Yearbook (WCY) 2013. 2014.

      [8] MQR. Malaysian Qualifications Registrer. 2016.

      [9] Lee C, Lee K, Pennings JM. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal. 2001;22(6-7):615-40.

      [10] Fishbein MA. Attitude and the prediction of behavior. New York: Wiley. 1967:477-92.

      [11] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research1975.

      [12] Chang M. Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. 1998;17(1):1825-34.

      [13] Ajzen I, Fishbein. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall. 1980.

      [14] Ajzen I, Driver B. Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Science. 1991;13(3).

      [15] Icek A. Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2002;80(6):2918-40.

      [16] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health. 2011;26(9):1113-27.

      [17] Siragusa L, Dixon KC. Theory of planned behaviour : Higher education students ' attitudes towards ICT-based learning interactions. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009. 2009:969-80.

      [18] Abelson RP, Kinder DR, Peters MD, Fiske ST. Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982;42(4):619-30.

      [19] Ajzen I, Timko C. Correspondence Between Health Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1986;7(4):259-76.

      [20] Hrubes D, Ajzen I, Daigle J. Predicting Hunting Intentions and Behavior : An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior Predicting Hunting Intentions and Behavior : An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. 2001(912280237):165-78.

      [21] Julie J. Preservice Teacher Attitudes and Intentions Toward and Inclusive Educational Environment : An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. ProQuest LLC. 2009.

      [22] Parikh D. Customer Acceptance of Internet Shopping in India: Impact of Shopping Orientations, Knowledge and Security 2011.

      [23] Todd ST, Peter A. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. 1995.

      [24] Suoranta M, Mattila M. Mobile banking and consumer behaviour: new insights into the diffusion pattern. Journal of Financial Services Marketing. 2004;8 (4):pp. 354-66.

      [25] Sadaf A, Newby TJ, Ertmer Pa. Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers' intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2012;45(March):171-95.

      [26] Ajjan H, Hartshorne R. Internet and Higher Education Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2 . 0 technologies : Theory and empirical tests. 2008;11:71-80.

      [27] Horng S-m, Lee Y-y. Applying a Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior to Study the Paying Behaviors of a Virtual Community. 2011:95-100.

      [28] Hsu M-h, Chiu C-m. Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. 2004(October).

      [29] Porter ME. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan, London.; 1990.

      [30] Mazzarol T, Soutar GN. Sustainable competitive advantage for educational institutions: a suggested model. International Journal of Educational Management. 1999;13(6):287-300.

      [31] Rahim A, Bakar A, Hashim F, Ahmad H. Distinctive Capabilities and Strategic Thrusts of Malaysia ’ s Institutions of Higher Learning. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 2009;1(2):158-64.

      [32] Blustain HGP, Lozier G. Assessing the new competitive landscape. In R.N. Katz & Associates (Eds.), Dancing with the devil. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1999.

      [33] Barney J. Firm Resources and sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Composite Materials. 1991;17(1):99-120.

      [34] Day GS. The of Market-Drive Capabilities Organizations. 2013;58(4):37-52.

      [35] Chen L-h. CSSHE Attracting East Asian Students to Canadian Graduate Schools. 2006:77-105.

      [36] Mazzarol T. Critical success factors for international education marketing. International Journal of Education Management. 1998;12(4):163-75.

      [37] Price IMFSL, Agahi H. The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities. Facilities. 2003;21(10):212-.

      [38] Mazzarol T, Soutar GN. ‘Push–pull’ factors influencing international student destination choice. International Journal of Educational Management. 2002;16(2):82-90.

      [39] Leeb SCM, C. Country of origin as a source of sustainable competitive advantage: the case for international higher education institutions in New Zealand. Journal of Strategic Marketing. 2011;19(6).

      [40] Driscoll E, Comm CL, Mathaisel DFX. A Lesson Plan For Sustainability In Higher Education. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE). 2013;6(2):255-66.

      [41] Patterson DP. The Impact of Teacher Qualification Standards on Teacher Quality. ProQuest. 2010.

      [42] Geoffrey NSJPT. Students’ preferences for university: a conjoint analysis. International Journal of Educational Management. 2002;16(1):40-5.

      [43] Castillo SP. What leaders are doing at best-practices community colleges to create an environment that is conducive to student engagement. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. 2007:pp. 9-10, 201-8.

      [44] Stricker AN. Learning Leadership: An Investigation of Principals' Attitudes Toward Teachers in Creating the Conditions Conducive for Learning in School-based Staff Development. ProQuest LLC. 2006:pp 227-32.

      [45] Jacob Anne M. A Study of Student Experiences in Transition from College/Technical Institute to University. Proquest LLB. 1999.

      [46] Yang F. Undergraduate Perspective on Campus Architecture : A Case Study. UMI Dissertation Publishing Proquest LLC. 2006.

      [47] Kajuna LW. Implementation of Technology Integration in Higher Education: A Case Study of the University of Dar-es-Salaam in Tanzania. ProQuest LLC. 2009:180-201.

      [48] Zou H, Liu X, Ghauri P. Technology Capability and the Internationalization Strategies of New Ventures. Organizations & Markets in Emerging Economies. 2010;1(1):100-19.

      [49] Wu KZZ, F. Technological Capability, Strategic Flexibility and Product Innovation. Strategic Management Journal. 2010;31:547-61.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 13650
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13650




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.