Relationships Between Trust, Organizational Justice and Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Evidence from Public Higher Educational Institution in Malaysia

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The main objective of this present study is to reveal the role of trust as a mediator in the relationship between organizational justice and performance appraisal satisfaction. This study is carried out by distributing questionnaire among 340 staffs. In this research, the questionnaire is administered to staffs from various schools in one of the Malaysian Public Higher Educational Institution (PHEI). Data are analysed by using the PROCESS (Hayes, 2013). As a result, a significant effect of organizational justice on performance appraisal satisfaction with trust as the mediator F(2, 337)=.396, p<.01, R2=.7016, β=.7813, t(337)=21.29, p<.01 is found in this study. A Sobel test is conducted and found a mediation on the model (z=3.2447, p=.00, K2=.0213). Therefore, it is found that trust mediated the relationship between organizational justice and performance appraisal satisfaction. Cultivating the degree of trust among staffs towards the performance appraisal satisfaction; and creating a conductive environment for staffs to improve their perceived organizational justice are the best strategies to achieve the goal for performance appraisal satisfaction in this institution. Theoretical and practical implications based on the results of this study are highlighted. In this line, few suggestions for the institution management are provided.

     


  • Keywords


    Performance appraisal satisfaction; organizational justice; trus

  • References


    1. [1] Ibeogu PH, Ozturen A. Perception of Justice in Performance Appraisal and Effect on Satisfaction : Empirical Findings from Northern Cyprus Banks. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;23(October 2014):964-9.

      [2] Jafari M, Bourouni A, HesamAmiri R. A new framework for selection of the best performance appraisal. European Journal of Social Sciences. 2009;7(3):92-100.

      [3] Saraih UN, Mohd Karim K, Ahmad R, Nordin N. The development model of performance appraisal satisfaction in relation to organizational justice : Evidences from Public Higher Educational Institution Akademia Baru. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies. 2017;6(1):72-85.

      [4] Colquitt JA. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(3):386-400.

      [5] Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Ng KY. Justice at the Millennium : A Meta-Analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(3):425-45.

      [6] Abdullah AGK, Anamalai Tal, Ismail A, Ling Y-L. Do Perceived Organizational Justice and Trust & Determine & Satisfaction of Performance Appraisal Practice ? A Case of Malaysian Secondary School teachers. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. 2015;2(8):23-37.

      [7] Bidarian S, Jafari P. The relationship between organizational justice and organizational trust. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;47:1622-6.

      [8] Getnet B, Jebena T, Tsegaye A. The effect of employees’ fairness perception on their satisfaction towards the performance appraisal practices: A case study of University of Gondar. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations. 2014;2(1):174-210.

      [9] Keeping LM, Levy PE. Performance appraisal reactions : Measurement , modeling , and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000;85(5):708-23.

      [10] Ismail A, Mohd Sani R, Mohamad MH. Communication openness in performance appraisal systems enhancing job satisfaction. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law. 2014(5):1-218.

      [11] Wee Phin L. The effectiveness of performance appraisal in the Private Education Industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Information. 2015;10(1):95-124.

      [12] Aleassa HM. Performance Appraisal Satisfaction and Counterproductive Behaviors : Direct and Moderating Effects. International Journal of Business Administration. 2014;5(1):76-89.

      [13] Ahmed A, Hussain I, Ahmed S, Fraz Akbar M. Performance appraisals impact on attitudinal outcomes and organisational performance. International Journal of Business and Management. 2010;5(10):62-8.

      [14] Greenberg J. Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the ends justify the means? Journal of Applied Psychology. 1987;72(1):55-61.

      [15] Adams JS. Inequity In Social Exchange. New York: Academic Press; 1965. p. 267-99.

      [16] Ikramullah M, Shah B, Sajjad ul Hassan F, Zaman T, Khan H. Fairness perceptions of performance appraisal system : An Eempirical study of civil servants in District Dera Ismail Khan , Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2011;2(21):92-100.

      [17] Warokka A, Gallato CG, Moorthy Tal. Organizational Justice in Performance Appraisal System and Work Performance : Evidence from an Emerging Market. Journal of Human Resources Management Research. 2012;18(10):1-19.

      [18] Venkatesh J, Vivekanandan K, Balaji D. Organizational Justice and Employee Satisfaction in Performance Appraisal. IRACST- International Journal of Research in Management & Technology. 2012;2(3):288-93.

      [19] Diriba C. A comparative study of employees performance appraisal practices and problems in Ethiopian Higher Education Institutions : The Case of Addis Ababa University and St . Mary University College: Addis Ababa University; 2012.

      [20] Brown S, McHardy J, Taylor K. Employee trust and workplace performance. Institute for Economic Analysis of Decision-making; 2013. p. 1-35.

      [21] Pichler S. The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. 2012(August).

      [22] Abdelhadi N, Jamal MB, Leclerc A. Performance appraisal system and employee satisfaction : The role of trust towards supervisors. Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies. 2015;3(1):40-53.

      [23] Paliszkiewicz J, editor Orientation on trust and organizational performance2012.

      [24] Cintrón R, Flaniken F. Performance appraisal : A Ssupervision or leadership tool? International Journal of Business and Social Science. 1990;2(17):29-37.

      [25] Scott D. The development of four new organizational measures of trust. In: Ray DF, editor.: Southern Management Association; 1981. p. 107-9.

      [26] Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis A Regression-Based Approach: Guilford Press; 2013.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 13983
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13983




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.