Hospital Building Maintenance Management Model

  • Authors

    • Abdullateef Olanrewaju
    • Wong Wai Fang
    • Seong Yeow Tan
    2018-05-22
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14010
  • Critical Success Factors, Building Performance, Productivity, Wellbeing, Place Managers
  • Wellness of the patients correlated with the hospital building performance. For building to achieve it design objectives and provide value added services to owners, users and other stakeholders, maintenance functions are strategic. As a result, management of the maintenance of hospital buildings is a delicate and expensive task to perform. Despite the fact that there is a lack of representative data on the maintenance of hospital buildings in Malaysia, there is a growing concern surrounding the subject. Fire outbreaks and decay in hospital buildings suggest a need to conduct critical research to investigate the maintenance management practices of hospital buildings. This paper reports part of an ongoing research that aims to develop a maintenance model for hospital buildings. Hence, this current research reports the results of literature reviews and observations on hospital buildings in Malaysia and their maintenance practices. Upon reviewing the literature, a conceptual framework of maintenance model for hospital buildings was proposed. The research found that the current approaches to maintenance management in the hospital buildings were corrective, fragmented, cost-driven and expensive. The procurement of maintenance services was mainly outsourcings. All these call into question, the decision making processes of the hospital maintenance organisations. Collectively, the above considerations have led to the formulation of the main research question- what are the critical success factors [CSFs] for the maintenance of hospital buildings? The current study also discussed a proposed research methodology for the main research. Furthermore, issues pertaining to the research design, ontology and epistemology were briefly discussed. It was established that to enrich the findings of the main research, it was imperative to collect primary data using both quantitative and qualitative research paradigms.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Guenther R, Vittori G. Sustainable healthcare architecture: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

      [2] Olanrewaju AL, Abdul-Aziz A-R. Building maintenance processes and practices: the case of a fast developing country: Springer; 2014.

      [3] Economic Planning Unit M. Tenth Malaysia Plan [2010–2015]. Putrajaya: Economic Planning Unit. 2010.

      [4] Razak MARMA, Jaafar M. An assessment on faulty public hospital design in Malaysia. Journal of Design+ Built. 2012;5[1].

      [5] Isa HM, Hassan P, Mat MC, Isnin Z, Sapeciay Z, editors. Learning from defects in design and build hospital projects in Malaysia. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity; 2011.

      [6] Ong WC, Suleiman Z. Problems in implementation of fire safety management in Malaysia Government hospital. Advances in Environmental Biology. 2015:47-51.

      [7] Ulrich RS, editor Effects of healthcare environmental design on medical outcomes. Design and Health: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Health and Design Stockholm, Sweden: Svensk Byggtjanst; 2001.

      [8] van den Berg A, Wagenaar C. Healing by architecture. The architecture of hospitals Rotterdam: NAi Publishers. 2006:254-7.

      [9] Shohet IM, Lavy-Leibovich S, Bar-On D. Integrated maintenance monitoring of hospital buildings. Construction Management & Economics. 2003;21[2]:219-28.

      [10] Booty F. Facilities management handbook: Routledge; 2009.

      [11] Mills ED. Building maintenance and preservation: a guide for design and management: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1980.

      [12] Zavadskas EK, Vilutienė T. A multiple criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block's maintenance contractors: I—Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria. Building and environment. 2006;41[5]:621-32.

      [13] Spare JH, editor Building the business case for condition-based maintenance. Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, 2001 IEEE/PES; 2001: IEEE.

      [14] Christian J, Newton L, Gamblin T, editors. A comparison of the roof maintenance management systems of two public sector organizations. Annual Conference of Canadian Society for Civil Engineering; 2002.

      [15] Chanter B, Swallow P. Building maintenance management: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

      [16] Kelly J, Male S, Graham D. Value management of construction projects: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

      [17] Darko A, Chan AP. Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat International. 2016;57:53-63.

      [18] Shohet IM. Key performance indicators for maintenance of health-care facilities. Facilities. 2003;21[1/2]:5-12.

      [19] Shohet IM. Building evaluation methodology for setting maintenance priorities in hospital buildings. Construction Management and Economics. 2003;21[7]:681-92.

      [20] Enshassi AA, El Shorafa F. Key performance indicators for the maintenance of public hospitals buildings in the Gaza Strip. Facilities. 2015;33[3/4]:206-28.

      [21] Shohet IM, Nobili L. Application of key performance indicators for maintenance management of clinics facilities. International Journal of Strategic Property Management. 2017;21[1]:58-71.

      [22] Pellitteri G, Belvedere F, editors. Characteristics of the hospital buildings: changes, processes and quality. Proceedings from 2010 ARCC_EAAE International Conference on Architectural Research; 2010.

      [23] Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education: Routledge; 2013.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Olanrewaju, A., Wai Fang, W., & Yeow Tan, S. (2018). Hospital Building Maintenance Management Model. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.29), 747-753. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14010