Load balancing strategies in software defined networks

  • Authors

    • Gourav Shrivastava MANIT Bhopal
    • Praveen Kaushik MANIT Bhopal
    • R. K.Pateriya MANIT Bhopal
    2018-08-22
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14017
  • Load Balancing, Open Flow, Software-Defined Networking Semicolon

  • Abstract

    In the past few years, network requirements have been changing frequently as the amount of data traffic increasing exponentially so it is difficult to utilize the full capacity of network resources. Software Defined Networking (SDN) is emerging as a new networking technology which decouples the control plane from the data plane in the network devices. Separation of control and data plane allows a network administrator a better control over network management and also enables new development through network programmability. Presently Open-Flow is the most popular SDN protocol which provides communication between network devices and controller. In this paper, the Round Robin algorithm is compared with the Dynamic load balancing algorithm using the OpenFlow protocol in SDN under varying load conditions of TCP and UDP traffic. Experimental analysis shows that the dynamic load balancing strategy works better than the Round Robin load balancing.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] F. Hu, Q. Hao and K. Bao, "A Survey on Software-Defined Network and OpenFlow: From Concept to Implementation," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2181-2206, Fourthquarter 2014.

      [2] Open Networking Foundation (ONF),SDN Architecture, Issue 1, ONF TR-502 (2014).

      [3] N. Handigol, S. Seetharaman, M. Flajslik, N. McKeown, and R. Johari, “Plug-n-Serve: Load-balancing web traffic using Open Flowâ€. Demo at ACM SIGCOMM (2009).

      [4] Wang R, Butnariu D, Rexford J, “OpenFlow-based server load balancing gone wildâ€, In: Proceedings of the 11th USENIX conference on hot topics in management of internet, cloud, and enterprise networks and services, pp 1212, (2011).

      [5] Uppal H, Brandon D, “OpenFlow based load balancingâ€, In: Proceedings of CSE561: networking. Project report. University of Washington (2010).

      [6] M. Koerner and O. Kao. “Multiple Service Load-Balancing with Open Flowâ€, IEEE 13th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (2012).

      [7] H. Long, Y. Shen, M. Guo and F. Tang, "LABERIO: Dynamic load-balanced Routing in OpenFlow-enabled Networks," 2013 IEEE 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), Barcelona, 2013, pp. 290-297.

      [8] Bob Lantz, Brandon Heller, and Nick McKeown. "A network in a laptop: rapid prototyping for software-defined networks" In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (Hotnets-IX). ACM, New York, NY, USA, , Article 19 (2010).

      [9] Floodlight Controller URL http://www.projectfloodlight.org/floodlight

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Shrivastava, G., Kaushik, P., & K.Pateriya, R. (2018). Load balancing strategies in software defined networks. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1854-1857. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14017

    Received date: 2018-06-11

    Accepted date: 2018-08-03

    Published date: 2018-08-22