The Expert Choice Implementation in Selecting the Electronic Voting Software

  • Authors

    • Faisal .
    • Muhammad Ridwan
    • Mardawati .
    2018-05-22
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14262
  • Analytical Hierarchy Process, Decision support system, Electronics Election Processing, Expert Choice, Multi-Criteria Decision Making

  • Abstract

    The voting service process conducted today is still done manually so that it becomes a decision to utilize the electronic voting. The electronic voting greatly reduces human control and human direct influence on this voting process. Problems faced by end users in the selection are there are so many choices of electronic voting software. Decision making, essentially a form of election of the various alternatives of action or multi-criteria decision making that can be selected. Decision support system in this research is used to select the type of electronic voting software. The method used in this research is the multi criteria decision making and analytical hierarchy process using expert choice software. And aims to make decisions that can make certain parties to take the best decision in choosing the type of electronic voting software. From the data processing is concluded that the first sequence is online voting 58.3%, express vote 17.2%, simply voting 17% and ballot online 7.5%. Processing of data obtained from the respondent expert inconsistencies value ratio is less than 0.1, thus the combined geometric calculation result data is fairly consistent.

     

  • References

    2. style='font-size:8.0pt'>
    3. style='mso-spacerun:yes'> ADDIN EN.REFLIST
    4. field-separator'>[1] Wolf P, Nackerdien R, Tuccinardi D. Introducing Electronic Voting: Essential Considerations. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2011:4-29.

      [2] Roger RF, Marek JD. Decision Support Systems Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, [pp. 794-802]. Taylor & Francis, Decision Systems Laboratory School of Information Sciences and Intelligent Systems Program University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; 2007.

      [3] Chen Z. Consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments: Kansas State University Manhattan, KS; 2005.

      [4] Andayani S, Mardapi D, editors. Performance Assessment Dalam Perspektif Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, Fakultas MIPA; 2012.

      [5] Marimin P. Teknik dan Aplikasi Pengambilan Keputusan Kriteria Majemuk. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. 2004.

      [6] Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process: planning. Priority Setting Resource Allocation, MacGraw-Hill, New York International Book Company. 1980:287.

      [7] Kohno T, Stubblefield A, Rubin AD, Wallach DS, editors. Analysis of an electronic voting system. Security and Privacy, 2004 Proceedings 2004 IEEE Symposium on; 2004: IEEE.

      [8] Rivest RL. On the notion of ‘software independence’in voting systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2008;366[1881]:3759-67.

      [9] Prasetyo EN. Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Web Untuk Menentukan Antivirus Yang Tepat Dengan Metode. Analytical Hierarkhi Process. 2011.

      [10] Hafsah M, Richard Kodong F, Julian A, editors. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Hotel Dengan Menggunakan Metode Promitee dan AHP. Seminar Nasional Informatika 2011; 2011.

      [11] SUNARTO S. SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN HANDPHONE METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS [AHP] BERBASIS PHP: Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya; 2011.

      [12] Setiawan D. Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Pemilihan Produk Laptop Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer AMIKOM. 2012.

      [13] Podungge D, Latief M, Alulu AF. Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarkhi Process [AHP] untuk Menentukan Pemilihan Pengawas Sekolah. 2012.

      [14] Khoiriyah UA. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process [AHP] Berbasis Web [Studi Kasus Di Pusat Penjaminan Mutu Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Adisutjipto Yogyakarta]. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga; 2013.

    5. mso-fareast-font-family:Batang;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:
    6. KO;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'>

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    ., F., Ridwan, M., & ., M. (2018). The Expert Choice Implementation in Selecting the Electronic Voting Software. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.29), 811-814. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14262

    Received date: 2018-06-18

    Accepted date: 2018-06-18

    Published date: 2018-05-22