Perceptions Passengers on Service Quality: Public Transport in Kuala Lumpur

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    The quality of service is a measurement of the level of service provided against the expectations of customers. This research examines the behaviour of passengers using public transport with respect to the service quality of public transit. A questionnaire was answered by 412 passengers at one of the main railway stations, Kuala Lumpur Sentral. Empirical data were extracted based on the information collected from the survey. Structural equation modelling was used to examine the measurement model. The findings of the study reveal that public transport passengers are significantly influenced by service attributes, for example, vehicle safety, cleanliness of the facility, and management of complaints. These findings identify the important service attributes that public transportation services in Kuala Lumpur need to prioritise. This study will help ascertain whether service quality meets or exceeds the expectations of the passengers.

     


  • Keywords


    Kuala Lumpur; service quality; public transport; and Structural Equation Modelling

  • References


    1. [1] Berry LL, Zeithaml VA, Parasuraman A. Five imperatives for improving service quality. MIT Sloan Management Review. 1990;31(4):29.

      [2] Phanikumar C, Maitra B, editors. Modeling willingness-to-pay values for rural bus attributes under different trip purposes. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum; 2010.

      [3] Li Z, Hensher DA. Crowding and public transport: a review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal. Transport Policy. 2011;18(6):880-7.

      [4] MALAYSIA MMS. Department of Statistics, Malaysia. 2014.

      [5] Hall KLC. Kuala Lumpur structure plan 2020. Kuala Lumpur: KLCH. 2004.

      [6] Joewono TB, Kubota H. User satisfaction with paratransit in competition with motorization in indonesia: anticipation of future implications. Transportation. 2007;34(3):337-54.

      [7] Administration USFT, Corporation TD, International M, Program TCR, Systematics C. A Handbook for Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality: Transportation Research Board; 1999.

      [8] Kittelson, Associates, Administration USFT, Program TCR, Corporation TD. Transit capacity and quality of service manual: Transportation Research Board; 2003.

      [9] Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. the Journal of Marketing. 1985:41-50.

      [10] Oliver RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research. 1980:460-9.

      [11] Cronin Jr JJ, Taylor SA. Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. The journal of marketing. 1992:55-68.

      [12] Cronin JJ, Brady MK, Hult GTM. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of retailing. 2000;76(2):193-218.

      [13] Huang YK, editor THE EFFECT OF AIRLINE SERVICE QUALITY ON PASSENGERS'BEHAVIOURAL INTENTIONS USING SERVQUAL SCORES: A TAIWAN CASE STUDY. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies; 2009: Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies.

      [14] Chiao Y-C. An integrated model for the effects of perceived product, perceived service quality, and perceived price fairness on consumer satisfaction and loyalty. 2001.

      [15] Al-Rousan MR, Mohamed B. Customer loyalty and the impacts of service quality: The case of five star hotels in Jordan. International journal of human and social sciences. 2010;5(13):886-92.

      [16] Stank TP, Goldsby TJ, Vickery SK. Effect of service supplier performance on satisfaction and loyalty of store managers in the fast food industry. Journal of Operations Management. 1999;17(4):429-47.

      [17] Hellier PK, Geursen GM, Carr RA, Rickard JA. Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European journal of marketing. 2003;37(11/12):1762-800.

      [18] Dodds WB, Monroe KB, Grewal D. Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of marketing research. 1991:307-19.

      [19] Lai W-T, Chen C-F. Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers—The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transport Policy. 2011;18(2):318-25.

      [20] Susnienė D. Quality approach to the sustainability of public transport. Transport. 2012;27(1):102-10.

      [21] Cafiso S, Di Graziano A, Pappalardo G. Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety. Safety science. 2013;57:254-63.

      [22] Cafiso S, Di Graziano A, Pappalardo G. Road safety issues for bus transport management. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2013;60:324-33.

      [23] Filipović S, Tica S, Živanović P, Milovanović B. Comparative analysis of the basic features of the expected and perceived quality of mass passenger public transport service in Belgrade. Transport. 2009;24(4):265-73.

      [24] Dell’Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecin P. The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transport Policy. 2011;18(1):217-27.

      [25] de Oña J, de Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G. Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach. Transport Policy. 2013;29:219-26.

      [26] Lin J-H, Lee T-R, Jen W. Assessing asymmetric response effect of behavioral intention to service quality in an integrated psychological decision-making process model of intercity bus passengers: a case of Taiwan. Transportation. 2008;35(1):129-44.

      [27] Parasuraman A, Berry LL, Zeithaml VA. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of retailing. 1991;67(4):420.

      [28] Wen C-H, Lan L, Cheng H-L. Structural equation modeling to determine passenger loyalty toward intercity bus services. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2005(1927):249-55.

      [29] Jomnonkwao S, Ratanavaraha V. Measurement modelling of the perceived service quality of a sightseeing bus service: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Transport Policy. 2016;45:240-52.

      [30] Tyrinopoulos Y, Antoniou C. Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications. Transport Policy. 2008;15(4):260-72.

      [31] wonderful_malaysia. http://www.wonderfulmalaysia.com/. 2015.

      [32] world_class_transportation_Hub A. http://www.klsentral.com.my/conn_main.aspx 2015 [cited 2015 30 sep 2015].

      [33] Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis: Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ; 2006.

      [34] Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH, Berge JMt. Psychometric theory: JSTOR; 1967.

      [35] Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science. 1988;16(1):74-94.

      [36] Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate behavioral research. 1990;25(2):173-80.

      [37] Hoyle R. The structural equation modeling approach. Basic concepts and fundamental issues. EnR. H. Hoyle. Structural Equation Modeling. 1995.

      [38] Chau PY, Hu PJH. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach*. Decision sciences. 2001;32(4):699-719.

      [39] Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming: Routledge; 2013.

      [40] Ho R. Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS: CRC Press; 2006.

      [41] Lomax RG, Schumacker RE. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling: Routledge Academic New York, NY; 2012.

      [42] Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press. New York. 2005:59.

      [43] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research. 1981:382-8.

      [44] Suki NM. Passenger satisfaction with airline service quality in Malaysia: A structural equation modeling approach. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2014;10:26-32.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 14273
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14273




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.