Reduction in Pavement Thickness by Using Geogrid

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    An effective way of improving the properties of naturally occurring soils for pavement construction is by using geo-synthetics. In many tropical countries, weak lateritic sub grades are common and often rejected after proof rolling during construction due to poor strength. The main aim of this research was to check the effect of geo-grid reinforcement  on  CBR value on a sample of relatively Red soil subgrade  under soaked and Unsoaked conditions and to Establish the effect of geogrid reinforced subgrade on the design thickness of low volume paved roads. Even though Red Soil has high strength but if we apply geogrids results going to be checked. Then by placing a layer of a Bi-axial geogrid at different heights like one layer at h/2, two layer at h/5 top and bottom ,three layers at h/6 top, bottom and middle , the effects of geogrid reinforcement on California Bearing Ratio values are investigated. This was undertaken for three strengths of geogrid and without geogrids in both soaked and Unsoaked conditions. The CBR values were used to determine the pavement thicknesses. The results indicate that the pavement thickness is reduced by 21.31% by using double layer in the Soaked condition i.e. Worse condition.

     

     


  • Keywords


    geo-synthetics, geo-grid, CBR value.

  • References


      [1] Ghosal, and N. Som, Use of geosynthetics in India: Experiences and potential, edited by G.Venkatappa Rao, and K.R Saxena, CBIP, New Delhi, 1989, 321-334.

      [2] G. Venkatappa Rao, and P.K. Benarjee, Geosynthetics: Recent developments, Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, 22, 1997, 318-336.

      [3] J. Leng, Characteristics and behavior of geogrid reinforced aggregate under cyclic loading, doctorial diss., North Carolina State University, NC, 2002.

      [4] G. Gosavi, K.A. Patil, and S. Saran, Improvement of properties of black cotton soil subgrade through synthetic reinforcement, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Roorkee, 2004.

      [5] S.A. Naeini, and R. Moayed, Effect of plasticity index and reinforcement on CBR value of soft clay, International Journal of Civil Engineering; 7(2), 2009, 124 – 130.

      [6] ErdalCokca, VeyselYazici, VehbiOzaydin (2009), “Stabilization of expansive clays using granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and GBFS-cement”, International journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 27:489-499.

      [7] EceCelik, ZaliheNalbantoglu (2013),” Effects of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) on the swelling properties of lime-stabilized sulfate-bearing soils”, Engineering Geology 163: 20–25.

      [8] Craig R.F, “Craigs Soil Mechanics”, Spon Press, Taylor and Francis group, London and New York.

      [9] Bell F. G (1996), “Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils”, Science direct, Engineering Geology, Vol. 32: 223-237.

      [10] ArgawAshaAshango and NiharRanjanPatra (2016), “Behavior of Expansive Soil Treated with Steel Slag, Rice Husk Ash, and Lime”, ASCE, 1943-5533.0001547.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 14473
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.3.14473




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.