Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Framework for the Integrated Urban Water System

  • Authors

    • Pooja Shrivastava
    • M K. Verma
    • Meena Murmu
    • Ishtiyaq Ahmad
    2018-07-04
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.6.15070
  • MCDA, uncertainty, framework, risk management, performance assessment.

  • Abstract

    Over the past century urban water system of developed and developing cities are under increasing stress as water dearth.  The estimation of possible solutions for water management in megacities requires the spatially distributed dynamic and grid-based replication of the evolution of public water infrastructure under consideration of changes (e.g. climate, global, environment, economy, and land-use). These simulations can be realized with the help of frameworks for integrated urban water system. The MCDA framework for integrated approaches of urban water system is characterized as single system (COMBINED SEWER SYSTEM) and entire system (WATER DISTRIBUTION, SEWER NETWORK etc.) investigation with consideration of decentralized system and spatial-temporal interactions and the dynamic feedback of population models to water infrastructure. Urban water system needs the frame work which will meet the sustainable needs of future. The present work identifies the best solutions for existing problems in urban water infrastructure while making interaction with stakeholders to reach sustainable framework for urban water management in this water dearth regions. This framework will provide new knowledge of sustainable integration system between the social and environmental issues.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Al-Harbi KMAS, “Application of the AHP in project managementâ€, International journal of project management, Vol.19, No.1, (2001), pp.19-27.

      [2] Baloch MA & AyÅŸegül T, “Development of an integrated watershed management strategy for resource conservation in Balochistan Province of Pakistanâ€, Desalination, Vol.226, No.1-3, (2008), pp.38-46.

      [3] Buckley JJ, “Fuzzy hierarchical analysisâ€, Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol.17, No.3, (1985), pp.233-247.

      [4] Cosgrove WJ & Rijsberman FR, “The use of water today, chap. 2 of Worldwide vision, making water everybody’s business: World Water Councilâ€, Vol.28, (2000), pp.4-21.

      [5] Dodgson JS, Michael S, Alan P & Lawrence DP, “Multi-criteria analysis: a manualâ€, Communities and local government, (2009).

      [6] EU-WFD, “The European Parliament and the Council of the European Unionâ€, Directive 2000/60/EC of October 23, 2000, establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy (European Water Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Communities, (2000).

      [7] https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-modelling-and-software/editorial-board/dp-ames"> Ames DP, “Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs)â€, Official Journal of the International Environmental Modelling & Software Society, (2009).

      [1] Finan JS & Hurley, WJ, “Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scaleâ€, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.112, No.2, (1999), pp.367-372.

      [2] Gesteland R, Cross-cultural business behavior, Negotiating, selling, sourcing and managing across cultures, 4th edn. Business School Press, Copenhagen, 2005.

      [3] Gibney R, Shang J () Decision making in academia: a case of the dean selection process. Math Comput Model, Vol.46, No.7–8, (2007), pp.1030–1040

      [4] Greeno JG, “Indefinite goals in well-structured problemsâ€, Psychol Rev., Vol.83, (1976), pp.479–491

      [5] Hermans L, Stakeholder-oriented valuation to support water resources management processes: Confronting concepts with local practice. Food & Agriculture Org., Vol.30, (2006).

      [6] Just RE & Netanyahu S, “Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resourcesâ€, Kluwer, Dordrecht, (1998).

      [7] Kampragou E, Eleftheriadou E & Mylopoulos Y, “Implementing equitable water allocation in transboundary catchments: the case of river Nestos/Mestaâ€, Water Resour Manag, Vol.21, (2007), pp.909–918.

      [8] Keeney RL and Howard R, Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge university press, (1993).

      [9] Lewis RD, When cultures collide. Leading across cultures, 3rd rev. edn. Brealey, Boston, (2007).

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Shrivastava, P., K. Verma, M., Murmu, M., & Ahmad, I. (2018). Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Framework for the Integrated Urban Water System. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.6), 290-293. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.6.15070

    Received date: 2018-07-05

    Accepted date: 2018-07-05

    Published date: 2018-07-04