Performance Analysis of Different Electrical Filters in 10G Hybrid Passive Optical Network

  • Authors

    • N. Subhashini VIT University, Chennai
    • A. Brintha Therese
    2018-07-04
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15758
  • Access Network, Passive Optical Networks, WDM-PON, Hybrid PON, Electrical Filters

  • Abstract

    With growing number of applications and network traffic, optic fibers are extensively used in the access part of the network. Passive Optical Networks (PON) in particular, Ethernet PON (EPON) networks based on Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) are more prominently used in many parts of the world. Though Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) PON has its own advantages, considering the cost and utilisation of such networks in the access part makes it less useful. On the other hand, Hybrid PON network combines the advantages of both EPON and WDM PON Networks. The objective of this paper is to identify suitable electrical filters for a 16-channel Hybrid Passive Optical Network with a transmission rate of 10Gbps per channel, by analysing their performance in terms of Q factor and Bit Error Rate. Different filters like the Bessel filter, Gaussian filter, Raised Cosine Filter, Rectangular filter, Butterworth filter, Chebyshev Filter are compared and their performances are evaluated. DB Modulation format that provides a longer reach is used at the transmitter to evaluate the different scenarios and the simulation is carried out using Optisystem.

  • References

    1. [1] F.Effenberger, T.S. El-Bawab, Passive optical networks (pons): past, present, and future, Optical Switching and Networking, Vol. 6, No.3, (2009), pp. 143-–150.

      [2] G.Kramer and G.Pesavento, Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPON): Building a Next-Generation Optical Access Network, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 40, No.2, (2002), pp. 66–73.

      [3] Cisco, VNI, Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology 2016–2021, (2017).

      [4] F.Effenberger, G.Kramer, B.Hesse, Passive optical networking update [pon update], IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol.45, No.3, (2007), pp. S6-–S8.

      [5] Kramer, G., Mukherjee, B., Pesavento, G., Ethernet pon (EPON): Design and analysis of an optical access network, Photonic Network Communications, Vol. 3, No.3, (2001), pp. 307-–319.

      [6] Miyata, S., Baba, K.-I., Yamaoka, K. , Exact mean packet delay for delayed report messages multipoint control protocol in EPON, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol.10, No.3, (2018), pp209-–219.

      [7] K. Grobe, M.Eiselt, Wavelength Division Multiplexing: A Practical Engineering Guide, John Wiley & Sons, (2013).

      [8] Banerjee, A., Park, Y., Clarke, F., Song, H., Yang, S., Kramer, G., Kim, K., Mukherjee, B., Wavelength-division-multiplexed passive optical network (wdm-pon) technologies for broadband access: a review’, Journal of optical networking, Vol.4, No.11, (2005), pp. 737—758.

      [9] Dhaini, A. R., Assi, C. M., Maier, M. and Shami, A. Dynamic wavelength and bandwidth allocation in hybrid tdm/wdm epon networks, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol.25, No.1,(2007), pp. 277— 286.

      [10] Kramer, G., De Andrade, M., Roy, R., Chowdhury, P.,â€Evolution of optical access networks: Architectures and capacity upgradesâ€, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol.100, No.5, (2012), pp1188—1196.

      [11] J.Kani, Enabling Technologies for Future Scalable and Flexible WDMPON and WDM/TDM-PON Systems , IEEE Journal of selected topics in Quantum Electronics, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2010,1290–1297.

      [12] Wong, E., Next-generation broadband access networks and technologies’, Journal of lightwave technology, Vol.30, No.4, (2012), pp. 597–608.

      [13] T.Ivaniga, P. Ivaniga, Comparison of the Optical Amplifiers EDFA and SOA Based on the BER and-Factor in C-Band, Advances in Optical Technologies, Vol. 2017, 2017.

      [14] I. Kurbatska, S.Spolitis, V.Bobrovs, A. Alsevska, G.Ivanovs,†Performance Comparison of Modulation Formats for 10 Gbit/s WDM-PON Systems†, Proceedings of Advances in Wireless and Optical Communications (RTUWO), 2016,(2016), pp.51–54.

      [15] E. Lach, W. Idler, Modulation formats for 100G and beyond , Optical Fiber Technology, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2011,377-386.

      [16] R. Hui, S. Zhang, B. Zhu, R. Huang, C. Allen, D. Demarest, Advanced optical modulation formats and their comparison in fiber-optic systems, The University of Kansas and Sprint Corporation, USA, 2004.

      [17] D. Lavery et al, A comparison of modulation formats for passive optical networks, Optics express, Vol. 19, No.26, 2011, pp. B836–B841.

      [18] J. Latal, J. Vitasek, P. Koudelka, P. Siska, R. Poboril, L. Hajek, A. Vanderka, V. Vasinek,†Simulation of modulation formats for optical access network based on WDM-PON†, Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON). Graz, (2014), pp.1–7.

      [19] J.Taylor, S.Tanev, Photonic simulation software tools for education, Education and Training in Optics and Photonics, Optical Society of America, (2007).

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Subhashini, N., & Brintha Therese, A. (2018). Performance Analysis of Different Electrical Filters in 10G Hybrid Passive Optical Network. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 6652-6656. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15758

    Received date: 2018-07-17

    Accepted date: 2019-05-21

    Published date: 2018-07-04