Influence of temperature and water to poultry waste ratio on methane production from anaerobic digestion

  • Authors

    • Hazwani Hasmi
    • Faieza Buyong
    2018-07-21
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11.16020
  • Anaerobic digestion, poultry waste, methane, temperature, water to poultry waste ratio,

  • Abstract

    The operating temperature and water to poultry waste ratio in anaerobic digestion process are among the factors that affect methane production. Therefore, this paper aimed to investigate the influence of temperature and water to poultry waste ratio on anaerobic digestion of poultry waste. In this study, three different temperatures were used; psychrophilic (25 °C), mesophilic (35 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C), while two different water to poultry waste ratio were examined; 1: 1 and 2: 1 (water: poultry waste). The methane production was the highest at mesophilic temperature followed by psychrophilic and thermophilic temperature with cumulative amount of methane at 14.99 x 10-3 L, 0.62 x 10-3 L and 0.22 x 10-3 L respectively. The highest methane production was observed at the water to poultry waste ratio of 2: 1 followed by ratio 1: 1 with cumulative amount of methane production at 0.11 x 10-3 L and 0.05 x 10-3 L.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Budiastuti H, Widyabudiningsih D, & Kurnia D R D (2017). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Temperature effect towards methane gas production and performances of anaerobic fixed bed reactors 162(1).

      [2] Chen T H, & Hashimoto A G. Bioresource Technology (1996), Effects of pH and substrate:inoculum ratio on batch methane fermentation. 56, 179–186.

      [3] Dhaked R K, Singh P, & Singh L (2010). Waste Management. Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions 30(12), 2490–2496.

      [4] Edwards D R, & Daniel T C (1992). Bioresource Technology. Environmental impacts of on-farm poultry waste disposal- A review 41, 9–33.

      [5] Eze J I, & Uzodinma E O (2009). The Pacific Journal of Science and technology. Generation of Methane Gas from Poultry Brooding House 10(2), 942–948.

      [6] Hashimoto A G. (1983). Agricultural Wastes Thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of swine manure 6, 175–191.

      [7] Jha A K, Li J, Zhang L, Ban Q, & Jin Y (2013). Advances in Water Resource and Protection (AWRP). Comparison between Wet and Dry Anaerobic Digestions of Cow Dung under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions 1(2), 28–38.

      [8] Lay J.J, Li Y Y, & Noike T (1997). Water Research. Influences of pH and moisture content on the methane production in high-solids sludge digestion 31(6), 1518–1524.

      [9] Lehtomäki A, Huttunen S, & Rintala J A (2007). Bioresources, Conservation and Recycling Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio 51, 591–609.

      [10] Levén L, Eriksson A R B, & Schnürer A (2007). Federation of European Microbiological Societies (FEMS). Effect of process temperature on bacterial and archaeal communities in two methanogenic bioreactors treating organic household waste 59(3), 683–693.

      [11] Kabouris JC, Tezel U, Pavlostathis SG, Engelmann M, Dulaney J, Gillette RA, & Todd AC (2009). Bioresource Technology. Methane recovery from the anaerobic codigestion of municipal sludge and FOG 100(15), 3701–3705

      [12] Kangle KM, Kore SV, Kore VS, & Kulkarni GS (2012). A Review Article (Open Access). Recent Trends in Anaerobic Codigestion 2(4), 210–219.

      [13] Kim J K, Oh B R, Chun Y N, & Kim S W (2006). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste 102(4), 328–332.

      [14] Li, Jha A K, He J, Ban Q, Chang S, & Wang P (2011). International Journal of the Physical Science. Assessment of the effects of dry anaerobic co- digestion of cow dung with waste water sludge on biogas yield and biodegradability 6(15), 3723–3732.

      [15] Marculescu C, & Stan C (2011). Energy Procedia. Poultry processing industry waste to energy conversion 6, 550–557.

      [16] Saidu M, Yuzir A, Salim M R, Salmiati, Azman S, & Abdullah N (2013). Bioresource Technology Influence of palm oil mill effluent as inoculum on anaerobic digestion of cattle manure for biogas production 141, 174–176.

      [17] Sibiya N T, Muzenda E, & Tesfagiorgis H B(2014). International Conference on Green Technology, Renewable Energy and Environmental Engineering, Effect of Temperature and pH on The Anaerobic Digestion of Grass Silage 27- 28.

      [18] Zhu G, & Jha A K (2014). ScienceAsia. Psychrophilic dry anaerobic digestion of cow dung for methane production: Effect of inoculum 39, 500–510.

      [19] Zinder S H, Anguish T, & Cardwell S C (1984). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. Effects of temperature on methanogenesis in a thermophilic (58 °C) anaerobic digestor 47(4), 808–813.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Hasmi, H., & Buyong, F. (2018). Influence of temperature and water to poultry waste ratio on methane production from anaerobic digestion. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.11), 254-257. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11.16020

    Received date: 2018-07-22

    Accepted date: 2018-07-22

    Published date: 2018-07-21