Life Cycle Analysis of Operational Energy in Office Projects Toward Sustainability Practices in the Malaysian Construction Industry

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Global warming mitigation is used as a requisite key to promote approaches and sustainable policies in developing countries that aim to minimize the level of carbon emission in built environment. In the past few years, energy demand has grown enormously in Malaysia. CO2 emission from energy consumption, mainly from electricity is a stark condemnation of commercial sector. Building operational energy particularly the thermal aspect, is the dominant factor that used to be highlighted and investigated due to the fact that it is the main proportion of operational energy consumption in buildings. The rate of energy dissipation in building components depends on design and environmental conditions. Accordingly, actions need to be taken in order to promote the quality of buildings in terms of heat exchanges, which can lead to a significant energy saving. Using of appropriate thermal insulation is effective way to diminish greenhouse gas emissions by reducing energy consumption. Therefore, the aim of the study is to investigate and determine the total amount of energy consumption from an office building. For reliability purposes, energy consumption from operation of baseline building was compared with the eco-friendly existing office building. Results show that, after implementation of sustainable solutions in the case study, operational energy consumption was successfully reduced to a grate extend.

     



  • Keywords


    Carbon footprint, Energy Consumption, Sustainable Development, Office Building, Operational Energy

  • References


      [1] Houghton, H., 2004. Global warming (3rd Edition), New York: Cambridge University Press. Energy production and demand.

      [2] Zabalza Bribia´n I, Aranda Uso´n A, Scarpellini S., 2009. Life cycle assessment in buildings: state-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Journal of Build Environ, 12(25): 10-20.

      [3] U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2016. Emissions of Green- house Gases in the United States. Retrieved 05 November 2013, from http://www.eia.gov/environment/reports.cfm?t=176.

      [4] John S. Dryzek, Richard B. Norgaard, David Schlosberg., 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, Oxford Handbooks in Politics & International Relations.

      [5] Krygiel E, Nies B., 2008. Green BIM successful sustainable design with building information modeling. Indianapolis (IN): Wiley Publishing.

      [6] Yanarella, E.J., Levine, R.S., Lancaster, R.W., 2009. Research and solutions: “Green” vs. sustainability: from semantics to enlightenment. Journal of Sustainability, 2(5): 296-302.

      [7] Department of Energy, 2016. Building energy consumption and efficiency commercial building energy consumption survey. Retrieved 20 April 2016, from http://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/.

      [8] Fayaz, R. and Kari, B.M., 2009. Comparison of energy conservation building codes of Iran, Turkey, Germany, China, ISO 9164 and EN 832. Journal of Applied Energy, 87: 115-34.

      [9] Center for Sustainable Systems. Residential buildings factsheet, 2009. University of Michigan. Pub. No. CSS, 01-08.

      [10] Trcˇka M, Hensen JLM, 2010. Overview of HVAC system simulation. Autom Constr, 219:93–9.

      [11] Nicol JF, Humphreys MA., 2010. Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Journal of Energy Build, 34:563–72.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 16203
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.16203




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.