The Role of Information Professionals in Protecting National History and Sovereignty

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Protecting for sovereignty can be an effective tool in order to cope with relations between states, drawing boundaries of acceptable behavior. It’s also a way of judging the actions taken from a state, whose owns ultimate power that always make the principle of sovereignty expendable. Information professional today play critical roles to ensure that state sovereignty would be strengthening and protecting them from external pressure. This paper highlights the need to pay more attention to the aspects of sovereignty that related with information professional roles and issues of Malaysian’s neighboring country. Ignoring these aspects of sovereignty will lead to the issues that can threaten national sovereignty and peace.

     


  • Keywords


    National history, Sovereignty, Information Professional

  • References


      [1] Grygiel, J. (2010). The Costs of Respecting Sovereignty. Orbis, 54(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2010.01.011

      [2] (Wolfe, 2003).- missing

      [3] Omar, R. (2014). An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected MalaysiaSingapore Relations During the Mahathir Era : Discords and Continuity Rusdi Omar Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Politics and International Studies S, (May), 372.

      [4] Bajunid, O. F. (n.d.). The ongoing conflict in Southern Thailand and its international implications, 243–260.

      [5] Berg, E., & Kuusk, E. (2010). What makes sovereignty a relative concept? Empirical approaches to international society. Political Geography, 29(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.01.005

      [6] Choo, C. W. (2000). Working with knowledge: how information professionals help organisations manage what they know. Library Management, 21(8), 395-403. doi:10.1108/01435120010342770

      [7] Compliance and Enforcement. (2014). Sovereignty in the Age of Global Terrorism, 43-54. doi:10.1163/9789004299580_005

      [8] Evans, Gareth and Sahnoun, M. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. International Commission on Intervention and State Soverignty, VIII. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362369042000315069

      [9] Fennessy, G., & Burstein, F. (2007). Role of Information Professionals as Intermediaries for Knowledge Management in Evidence-Based Healthcare. Healthcare Knowledge Management Health Informatics, 28-40. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-490090_3

      [10] Grygiel, J. (2010). The Costs of Respecting Sovereignty. Orbis, 54(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2010.01.011

      [11] Marouf, L. (2004). Role and Contribution of Corporate Information Centers toward KM Initiatives: An Analysis of Managers Perceptions. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 03(01), 9-25. doi:10.1142/s0219649204000638

      [12] McGregor, A. (2010). Sovereignty and the responsibility to protect: The case of Cyclone Nargis. Political Geography, 29(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.09.002

      [13] Nolte, G. (2005). Sovereignty as Responsibility? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ( American Society of International Law ), 99, 389–392.

      [14] Rad, A., Shams, G., & Naderi, B. (2009). Information Management and the Role of Information and Knowledge Managers: Managers’Perception. EDULEARN09 Proceedings, (July), 2504–2516. Retrieved from http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/7338/pdf/40.pdf


 

View

Download

Article ID: 16360
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.16360




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.