Recordkeeping Metadata Standardization for Electronic Health Records System Integration: a Preliminary Study

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are beneficial in improving patient care, promoting safe practice, as well as enhancing patients and multiple providers’ communication and risk error reduction. However, it seems that the adoption of EHR system is happening very slowly to become fully integrated in both primary care and within hospital settings. In Malaysia, the implemented system still has limited integration and interoperability for supporting clinical operations among other Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOHM) hospitals, health centres, and clinics. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to discuss about this scenario and strain the need for solution through the consideration towards metadata standard establishment in health records system integration. Method used in this study is literature review analysis and face-to-face interview. The paper begins with discussions from various literatures highlighting the need of metadata standard for recordkeeping system integration. Subsequently, the face-to-face interview is done to explore the real situation in Malaysia to encounter the scenario discuss in the literatures. The finding of this study reveals that there is significant need for further research on record keeping metadata standard development for realization of electronic health records system integration. This study is significant for records managers, information technology managers, system developers and record keeping audit.

     


     

  • Keywords


    Electronic Health Records; integration; interoperability; recordkeeping metadata

  • References


      [1] Palabindala, V., Pamarthy, A., & Jonnalagadda, N. R. (2016). Adoption of electronic health records and barriers. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, 6(5), 32643.

      [2] Mohd Salleh, M. I., & Abdullah, R. (2016). The influence of system quality characteristics on health care providers’ performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 9(6), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2016.09.002

      [3] Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Halamka, J. D., Lippman, A., Original, I., & Vieira, T. (2016). A Case Study for Blockchain in Healthcare: “ MedRec ” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management.

      [4] Rolan, G. (2017). Towards Archive 2 . 0 : issues in archival systems interoperability. Archives and Manuscripts, 43(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.959535

      [5] Lee, J.-Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, G. (2013). A Study on the Analysis and Improvement of Medical Record Management in Large University Hospitals. Korean Journal of Records Management, 13(1), 107–134.

      [6] AbuKhousa, E., Mohamed, N., & Al-Jaroodi, J. (2012). e-Health Cloud: Opportunities and Challenges. Future Internet, 4(4), 621–645. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4030621

      [7] Bahga, A., & Madisetti, V. K. (2013). A cloud-based approach for interoperable electronic health records (EHRs). IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 17(5), 894–906. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2013.2257818

      [8] Abd Ghani, M. K., Bali, R. K., Naguib, R. N. G., & Marshall, I. M. (2008). Electronic health records approaches and challenges: a comparison between Malaysia and four East Asian countries. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 4(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEH.2008.018922

      [9] Paper, C., Khanapi, M., Ghani, A., Teknikal, U., Naguib, R., & Internat, C. (2008). Issues and Challenges in the Development of Electronic Health Records in Malaysia and VN-HISMANAG ’ 08 - Conference on Applications of Medical Informatics in Hospital Management Issues and Challenges in the Development of Electronic Health Records in Mala.

      [10] International Records Management Trust. (2016). Managing Metadata to Protect the Integrity of Records, (May).

      [11] Department of Education LINC Tasmania. State Records Guideline No 5 Recordkeeping Metadata (2015).

      [12] Aliza Ismail. (2010). Assessing the practice of trusted electronic records management in Malaysia government – controlled companies. Univerisiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

      [13] Hammami, R., Bellaaj, H., & Kacem, A. H. (2014). Interoperability of healthcare information systems. The 2014 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SNCC.2014.6866536

      [14] Kovac, M. (2014). E-health demystified: An E-government showcase. Computer, 47(10), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2014.282

      [15] Joanne Evans, Sue McKemmish and Barbara Reed, ‘Making Metadata Matter: Outcomes from the Clever Recordkeeping Metadata Project’, Archives & Manuscripts, vol. 37, no. 1, 2009, pp. 28–56.

      [16] Bunn, J. (2017). The Journal of the Archives and Records Association Developing descriptive standards : a renewed call to action. Archives & Records. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830066

      [17] Health Informatics Centre. (2013). HIMS Blueprint (Vol. 13). Retrieved from http://www.moh.gov.my/images/gallery/publications/hi/HIMS Blueprint.pdf

      World Health Organization. (2012). Management of patient information. Global Observatory for eHelath series – Volume 6

 

View

Download

Article ID: 16388
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.16388




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.