ECG Measurements to Emphasize Atrial Potentials Using Modified Limb Lead System

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    With the advancement in the field of Electrocardiology (ECG), the acquisition of electrical activity of the heart plays an important role in the diagnosis of various cardiovascular diseases. In general, this activity of conduction is acquired using Standard 12 Lead ECG system. Recently, a Modified Limb Lead system has been developed to study the atrial electrical activity for the diagnosis of atrial arrhythmias. The present study is to derive the normal limits of female subjects using Modified Limb Lead (MLL) system. This study was evaluated in 59 female subjects 19.52 ± 1 (Mean ± S.D) and is primarily involved to study atrial potentials with the use of precordial and modified limb lead position. In sinus rhythm female subjects, the P wave amplitude was 33.06 ± 21.18 µV and the Ta wave amplitude was 20.72 ± 18.16 µV. The P wave duration was 94.22 ± 10.64 ms, the Ta wave duration was 85.51 ± 17.49 ms. The results show that modifications in the limb electrode placement have significant effect on amplitudes and PR segment which may be of great importance for the assessment of atrial potentials.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Atrial arrhythmias, Electro cardiology, Modified Limb Lead System, Sinus rhythm, Standard 12 Lead System.

  • References


      [1] Einthoven W. “The different forms of the human electrocardiogram and their signification” Lancet 1912; 1:853-61.

      [2] Wilson FN, Johnston FD, MacLeod AG, Baker PS. “Electrocardiograms that represent the potential variations of a single electrode”. Am Heart J 1934; 9: 447-71.

      [3] Barnes A, Pardee HEB, White PD, Wilson FN, Wolferth CC. “Standardisation of precordial leads”- Supplementary report. Am Heart J 1938; 15: 235-9.

      [4] Mason RE, Likar I. “A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography”. Am Heart J 1966; 71; 196-205.

      [5] Holzmann M. “Die klinische Bedeutung der anterioren posterioren Brustwandableitungen im Elkrulardiogramm Arch”.Kreisl Forsch 1937; 1:1.

      [6] Sivaraman J, Uma G, Venkatesan S, Umapathy M, Dhandapani VE. “Normal limits of ECG measurements related to atrial activity using a modified limb lead system”. Anatol J Cardiol. 15 (2015) 2-6.

      [7] Sivaraman J, Uma G, Venkatesan S, Umapathy M, Dhandapani VE. “A novel approach to determine atrial repolarisation in electrocardiograms”. J Electrocardiol 2013; 46; e1.

      [8] Sivaraman J,Uma, G,Venkatesan S,Umapath M, Ravi M.S, “Unmasking of atrial repolarization waves using a simple modified limb lead system, Anatol. J. Cardiol. 15 (2015) 605-610.

      [9] Sivaraman J, Venkatesan S,Periyasamy R, Justin Joseph, Ravi Marimuthu Shanmugam, “Modified limb lead ECG system effects on electrocardiographic wave amplitudes and frontal plane axis in sinus rhythm subjects”, Anatolian journal of cardiology 17 (2017) 46-54.

      [10] Sivaraman J,Uma, G,Venkatesan S,Umapath M,,Keshav Kumar.N, A study on atrial Ta wave morphology in healthy subjects: An approach using P wave signal-averaging method. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 2014.Vol. 4(5): 675-680.

      [11] Sivaraman J,Uma G, Umapathy M. A modified chest leads for minimization of ventricular activity in normal electrocardiograms. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Biomedical Engineering, Penang, Malaysia, 2012. pp. 79-82.

      [12] Sivaraman J,Uma G,Angley P.L,Umapathy M, Venkatesan S,Palanikumar G. A study on stability analysis of atrial repolarization variability using ARX model in sinus rhythm and atrial tachycardia ECGs. Computer Methods and Programs in Medicine, 137, (2016), 341-351.

      [13] Sivaraman J, Saah electrocardiography: An insight toward micro waveform of atrioventricular node and His bundle potentials. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 18(2): 115-115, 2017.

      [14] Sivaraman J, Renu John. Effects of sinus rhythm on atrial ECG components using modified limb lead system. Proc 4th IEEE Int Conference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control, JUIT, Himachal Pradesh, pp. 527-530, 2017.

      [15] Johnson Francis, “ECG Monitoring Leads and Special Leads”, Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, 16 (2016) 92-95.

      [16] Madias J E, MD , “Low QRS voltage and its causes”, Journal of Electrocardiology 41 (2008) 498–500

      [17] Macfarlane Peter W., Lloyd Suzanne M., Singh Dilbag, Hamde Satish, Clark Elaine, Devine Brian, Francq Bernard G., Kumar Vinod, “Normal limits of the electrocardiogram in Indians”, Journal of Electrocardiology (2015), 04-13.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 16443
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.12.16443




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.