Treatment of Pretreated Textile Wastewater Using Modified Mbbr
-
2018-07-07 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.8.16843 -
Box Behnken factual design, magnetic field, MBBR, solar photofenton, textile effluent -
Abstract
Currently, water pollution control is one of the major logical zones. The textile industry is a major pollution causing industry among the industrial pollutions. Treatment of textile effluent utilizing customary physical as well as chemical strategies is costly, produces enormous amounts of sludge and needs the expansion of lethal chemicals. BOD to COD proportion of textile effluent is low. Thus it is not appropriate to treat textile effluent by a solitary physicochemical or biological process. In this investigation, the textile effluent is dealt with utilizing Moving Bed Bio-film Reactor (MBBR) with the magnetic field after improving the biodegradability by the solar photo-Fenton process. The carriers in MBBR is inoculated with azoarcus bacteria isolated from textile sludge. The fundamental  parameters as pH, carrier filling ratio and contact time were optimized utilizing Box Behnken factual design. The MBBR process has most extreme efficiency at pH 7, filling ratio of 62% and a contact time 2.4 days. In this optimum condition 68.9% BOD and 80% COD are expelled. At the point when the pretreated wastewater was dealt with MBBR reactor under the influence of magnetic field, the efficiency of the treatment is additionally expanded, so 87.4% COD expulsion and 87% BOD evacuation were accomplished at 12 mT attractive field power when exposure time was at 12 hrs.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] DebabrataMazumder(2011), “Process evaluation and treatability study of wastewater in a textile dyeing industryâ€,International Journal Of Energy And Environment,Volume 2, Issue 6, Pp.1053-1066
[2] Jin X, Liu G., Xu Z., Yao W., (2007), “Decolorization of a dye industry effluent by AspergillusfumigatusXC6†Applications of Microbiology&Biotechnology,vol-74, pp-239–243.
[3] Ramesh Babu R., Parande A.K. and Raghu S. (2007), “Textile technology: Cotton Textile Processing:Waste Generation and Effluent Treatmentâ€, Journal of Cotton Science,Vol.2,2007,pp.141-153.
[4] Muhammad Saqib Nawaz and Muhammad Ahsan(2014), “Comparison of physico-chemical,advanced oxidation and biological techniques for the textile wastewater treatmentâ€, Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol-53, pp-717–722
[5] Kalyani D.C, Patil P.S, Jadhav J.P, GovindwarS.P(2008), “Biodegradation of reactive textile dye red BLI by an isolated bacterium Pseudomonas sp.â€,BioresourceTechnology,vol-99, pp-4635–4641.
[6] Jonstrup M., Punzi M., Mattiasson B (2011), “Comparison of anaerobic pre-treatment and aerobic post-treatment coupled to photo-Fenton oxidation for degradation of azo dyesâ€, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, Vol-224, pp 55–61.
[7] Metcalf & Eddy Inc., “Wastewater Engineering : Treatment, Disposal and Reuseâ€, Tata Mc. Graw Hill Publishing Company, New Delhi, 4th edition, 2003.
[8] MajidKermani, BijanBina, HosseinMovahedian, Mohammad Mehdi Amin, MahnazNikaeen (2009), “Biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal from wastewater using moving bed biofilm processâ€, Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 7, pp-67-73.
[9] Asad, S., Amoozegar, M. A., Pourbabaee, A. A., Sarbolouki, M. N., Dastgheib, S. M. M. (2007), “Decolorization of textile azo dyes by newly isolated halophilic and halotolerant bacteriaâ€, Bioresource Technology, vol-98, pp-2082–2088.
[10] Kariminiaae-Hamedaani, H., Sakurai, A., Sakakibara, M. (2007), “Decolorization of synthetic dyes by a new manganese peroxidase-producing white rot fungus†Dyes. Pigments.,vol-72, pp-157–162.
[11] NurSyamimiZaidi , Johan Sohaili , KhalidaMuda& Mika Sillanpa(2014), “Magnetic field application and its potential in water and wastewater treatment systemsâ€, Separation & Purification Reviews vol-43, pp-206–240
[12] M. SrinivasaRaoand OmprakashSahu(2013), “Study of Electromagnetic Waves on Industrial Waste Waterâ€,Physics and Materials Chemistry, Vol.-1, pp 34-40.
[13] AgnieszkaTomska, Lidia Wolny (2008), “Enhancement of biological wastewater treatment by magnetic field exposureâ€, Desalination,vol-222, pp-368–373.
[14] H. Yavuz and S.S. Çelebi (2000), “Effects of magnetic field on activity of activated sludge in wastewater treatmentâ€, Enzyme Microbiology, vol-26, pp-22–27.
[15] Bo Liua, BaoyuGao, Xing Xu, Wei Hong, QinyanYue, Yan Wang, Ying Sub (2011), “The combined use of magnetic field and iron-based complex in advancedtreatment of pulp and paper wastewaterâ€, Chemical Engineering Journal,vol-178, pp-232– 238.
[16] Gordon McKay, RafieRushdy Mohammed, Mohammad Reza Ketabchi (2014),“Combined magnetic field and adsorption process for treatment of biologically treated palm oil mill effluent (POME)â€,Chemical Engineering Journal, vol-243, pp-31–42.
[17] Ali Yadollahpur,SamanehRashidi, ZohreGhotbeddin,MostafaJalilifar and ZohrehRezaee (2014), “Electromagnetic fields for the Treatment of Wastewater: A Review of Applications and Future Opportunitiesâ€, Jr. of pure and applied microbiology,Vol8(5),pp-3711-3719.
[18] M.Kermani,B.Bina,H.Movahedian,M.M.Amin&M.Nikaein(2008), “Application of Moving Bed Biofilm Process for Biological Organics & Nutrients Removal from Municipal Wastewaterâ€, American Jr. Of Envl. Sciences, 4(6) ,pp-675-682.
[19] M.Makowska,M.Spychala,R.Blazejewski(2009),“Treatment of eptic Tank Eflluent in Moving Bed Biological Reactors with Intermittent Aerationâ€, Polish Jr. Of Envl. Studies, Vol.18,No.6, pp-1051-1057.
[20] RajeshwariSivaraj, C.AgnesMariyaDorthy& R.Venckatesh (2011), “Isolation, Characterization & Growth Kinetics of Bacteria Metabolizing Textile Effluentâ€, Jr. of Bioscience Tech. ,Vol.2(4), pp-324-330.
[21] OgunjobiAdeniyiAdewale, OyinloyeIyadunniAdesola&Sanuth Hassan Adeyimi (2012), “Bioremediation of Effluent from Local Textile Industry using Bacillus licheniformisâ€, Newyork Scie. Jr.,5(12), pp-29-33.
[22] Andre BD, Fransisco JC &JuleBL(2007), “Review Paper on current technologies for decolorization of textile effluent†,Colourage,(40), pp-35-38.
[23] Yang Qiqi, He Quang&HushamT.Ibrahim(2012), “Review on Moving Bed Biofilm Processesâ€, Pak. Jr. Of Nutrition ,11(9), pp-706-713.
[24] Borkar R.P., Gulhane M.L. &Kotangale A.J.(2013), “Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor- A new Perspective in wastewater treatment†, Jr. Of Envl. Scie., Toxicology & Food Technology ,vol.6, Issue 6, pp-15-21.
[25] Mohammed A.AbdulMajeed, HisharoHmeedAlwan, Mohammed InamBaki, FauadR.Abtan, Hussein Irzooqi Sultan(2012), “Wastewater Treatment in Baghdad city using MBBRâ€, Engg. & Tech. Jr., Vol.30,No.9,pp-1550-1561.
[26] Adriana Maria Lotito, Marco De Sanctis, Claudio Di Iaconi, Giovanni Bergna(2014),“Textile wastewater treatment: Aerobic granular sludge vs activated sludge systemsâ€, Water Research ,54, Pp-337-346.
[27] E.HosseiniKoupaie, M.R.AlaviMoghaddam, S.H.Hashemi(2011), “Post-treatment of anaerobically degraded azodye Acid Red 18 using aerobic moving bed biofilm processes- Enhanced removal of aromatic aminesâ€, Jr. Of Hazardous materials, 195, pp-147-154.
[28] Arun Prasad &KokatiVenkataBhaskaraRao(2011), “Physicochemical Analysis of textile effluent &decolorization of textile azodye by Bacillus endo-phyticus strain VITABR 13â€, The IIOAB Jr.vol.2,Issue2,pp-55-62.
[29] Carmen S.D.Rodrigues, Luis M.Madeira, RuiA.R.Boaventura(2014), “Synthetic textile dyeing wastewater treatment by integration of advanced oxidation & Biological processes- Performance analysis with costs reductionâ€, Jr. Of Envtl. Chemical Engg.,pp-1027-1039.
[30] Mariana Neamtu,AyferYediler, IlieSiminiceanu, Antonius Kettrup(2003), “Oxidation of Commercial reactive azodye aqueous solutions by the photofenton&Fenton-like processesâ€, Jr. of Photochemistry & Photobiology. A:Chemistry,16,.pp-87-93.
[31] Oliveira R.,AlmediaF.,Santos L. & Madeira M.(2006), “Experimental Design of 2,4-Dichlorophenol Oxidation by Fenton’s Reactionâ€, Jr. of Environmental Engg. & Management, Vol.45, No.4, pp-1266-1276.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
J.Sosamony, K., & A.Soloman, P. (2018). Treatment of Pretreated Textile Wastewater Using Modified Mbbr. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.8), 106-110. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.8.16843Received date: 2018-08-05
Accepted date: 2018-08-05
Published date: 2018-07-07