Study on Alloy Steel TEW 6582 Machined Surface Rougness Under Dry Machining

  • Authors

    • Suhardi Napid
    • Muhammad Rafiq Yanhar
    • Ahmad Bakhori
    • Abdurrozzaq Hasibuan
    • Oris Krianto Sulaiman
    • Mhd. Asaad
    2018-04-15
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.16929
  • Dry machining, VB edge wear, surface roughness, alloy steel of T EW 6582
  • The purpose of research is to study the surface roughness of machining results obtained to give consideration that the possibility of dry machining can be realized at alloy steel machining of TEW 6582. In the field of surface texture only discuss the machined surface roughness with some testing that is processing and data analysis can be done statistically. The TEW 6582 alloy steel samples were produced from dry machining operations with 9 cutting forms using standard L 9 (34). In this case 3 variations of tool wear are determined by tool edge wear (VB) = 0.1 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.6 mm including also in wet machining. To cut the work piece used CNC machine, optical microscope and surface test . The roughness test was obtained the roughness value with dry machining for optimum cutting conditions ie HPK1.0.1 = 1,467 μm, HPK8,0.3  = 2,133 μm and HPK8,0.6 = 2,8 μm whereas value in wet machining was found with HPB1,0.1 = 1,581 μm, HPB8.0.3 = 2,304 μm and HPB8,0.6 = 2,906 μm. From the above machining results data, HPK8.06 can be determined as the most optimum cutting condition which can be concluded that dry machining gives better machining results  roughness through Ravg value and no significant difference is obtained when compared to wet machining after statistically analyzed, so that dry machining is a good chance that can be realized in manufacturing and automotive industries.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] KalpakjianS, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology. 1995.

      [2] A. Hasibuan et al., “Performance analysis of Supply Chain Management with Supply Chain Operation reference model,†vol. 1007, pp. 1–8, 2018.

      [3] V. Aaron, Factors affecting surface roughness in finish hard turning. 2003.

      [4] LiewWYH, Yuan, and N. BKA, Evaluation of Machining of Performance of STAVAX with PCBN Tools. 2004.

      [5] W. K. Carter and M. F. Usry, Cost Accounting, 13th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2002.

      [6] H. M, Cost and Process information Modeling for Dry Machining. 2004.

      [7] MTA-SME, The Future of Machining Technology and Porcess Machining Technology Association of The Society Manufacturing Engineering. Machining Technology Trens, 2011.

      [8] C. Haroen, G. A, and G. JH, The Influences of tool wear and Tool Life on Surface Integrity During Turning Tool Steel Using Uncoated Carbide. 2000.

      [9] A. Hasibuan, Metodologi Penelitian. 2013.

      [10] R. M. S. Rodrio P.Zellmann, Fernanda Fontanive, “Wear mechanisms during dry and wet turning of inconel 718 with ceramics tools†Int J Adv Manuf Technology. Verlag London: Springer, 2017.

      [11] R. KP and S. VG, “‘Dry Machining Of Superalloys’, Difficul- ties and Remedies,†IJSR, 2012.

      [12] B. H, Research & Technology Transfer Workgroup Dry Machining. 2004.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Napid, S., Rafiq Yanhar, M., Bakhori, A., Hasibuan, A., Krianto Sulaiman, O., & Asaad, M. (2018). Study on Alloy Steel TEW 6582 Machined Surface Rougness Under Dry Machining. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.13), 398-401. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.16929