Performance Male and Female Drivers in Drowsiness System Based on Psychomotor Vigilance Task Test

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Driving on the highway that takes a long time and monotonous often causes the motorist or motorcycle to feel fatigue. Fatigue can be divided into two: physical or motoric fatigue and psychological or mental fatigue. As a result of this fatigue the driver may feel drowsiness, loss of concentration that endangers the safety of the driver. Some literature distinguishes gender in ability or driving skills. This paper observed and measured gender differences in driving. Measurements using Psychomotor Vigilance Task to measure mental fatigue before and after the driver were given an Arithmetic Stress Test. The data obtained on experimental drivers of male and female will then be processed using statistical tests to find out whether the psychomotor vigilance task of female and male drivers have same performance or not. Statistical tests were performed using Paired Sample T-Test. We have 17 drivers with 13 men and 4 women, each taken 5 session obtained that the T-test value of session 1 to session 5 have the same result that is the performance male and female drivers has the same performance in fatigue, but the number of male driver collisions smaller than the number of female driver collisions.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Psychomotor Vigilance Task, T-test, Gender.

  • References


      [1] S. Liew, R. Hamidun, and N. F. Mohd Soid, “Differences of Driving Experience and Gender on Traffic Offences among Malaysian Motorists,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 103, 2017.

      [2] K. R. Murphy, B. Myors, and A. Wolach, Statistical Power Analysis, Fourth. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2014.

      [3] S. W. Huck, Reading Statistics and Research, Sixth. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012.

      [4] W. Sheng, Y. Ou, D. Tran, E. Tadesse, M. Liu, and G. Yan, “An integrated manual and autonomous driving framework based on driver drowsiness detection,” IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., pp. 4376–4381, 2013.

      [5] M. Basner and D. F. Dinges, “Maximizing sensitivity of PVT to Sleep Loss,” Sleep, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 581–591, 2011.

      [6] W. Halim, “Evaluasi Penggunaan Psychomotor Vigilance Task dalam Konteks Pengukuran Beban Kerja Mental,” Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2012.

      [7] F. M. Donald, “The classification of vigilance tasks in the real world,” Ergonomics, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1643–1655, 2008.

      [8] R. A. Grier et al., “The Vigilance Decrement Reflects Limitations in Effortful Attention, Not Mindlessness,” Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 349–359, 2003.

      [9] J. Mathis and C. W. Hess, “Sleepiness and vigilance tests,” Swiss Med. Wkly., vol. 139, no. 15–16, pp. 214–219, 2009.

      [10] D. F. Dinges, W. G. Whitehouse, E. C. Orne, and M. T. Orne, “The benefits of a nap during prolonged work and wakefulness,” Work Stress, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 139–153, 1988.

      [11] H. Inkeri, “Fatigue while driving in a car simulator : Effects on vigilance performance and autonomic skin conductance,” no. March, 2010.

      [12] S. Loh, N. Lamond, J. Dorrian, G. Roach, and D. Dawson, “the Validity of Psychomotor Vigilance Tasks of Less,” vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 339–346, 2004.

      [13] I. S. Lee, W. A. Bardwell, S. Ancoli-Israel, and J. E. Dimsdale, “Number of lapses during the psychomotor vigilance task as an objective measure of fatigue,” J. Clin. Sleep Med., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 163–168, 2010.

      [14] K. POLRI, “Accident Data,” Injury Type. .


 

View

Download

Article ID: 16937
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.16937




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.