Social Construction of Masculine Women Identity

  • Authors

    • Zikri Fachrul Nurhadi
    • Ummu Salamah
    • Yully Destari
    • Novie Susanti Suseno
    2018-08-08
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17182
  • constructivism, identity, masculine, social construction, women
  • Abstract

    The purpose of this study to discover and reveal the social construction of masculine woman identity in terms of externalization, objectivation, and internalization. This study used a qualitative approach, with a method or theory of social reality construction of constructivism paradigm. Data collection was done through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and literature. The study finding showed that the social construction of masculine woman identity in terms of externalization is influenced by internal and external factors. Internal factor is influenced by a family that makes informants show the social construction of masculine woman identity to the public. While external factor is influenced by association with male friend and technological advances (mass media) that have contributed to the formation of character, appearance style, and feeling to others. In general, social identity construction of masculine woman constructs her identity in a way  showed that masculine woman does not always have a negative character. In this case, a masculine woman can survive and adapt to the family, campus and community environments. The research finding showed that appearance changes will only happen if there is a will from the masculine woman herself, and the comfort level of masculine appearance can not change the identity.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Manda D, Suardi. Masculine women. Equilib Educ J. 2016;2(1):57–66.

      [2] Daryanto. Communication Studies. Bandung: PT. Tutorial Mode of Conscience Sejahtera; 2011.

      [3] Sugiono. Quantitative Research Methods, Qualitative and R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2010.

      [4] Wikipedia. Wikipedia. 2016. p. Tomboy.

      [5] 10 Berger ScConstrReal FoundKnowEvydyLife.pdf.

      [6] Bungin B. Sociology of Communication: Theory, Paradigm, and Discourse & Communication Technology in Society. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2006.

      [7] Nurhadi ZF. Theory of Communication (Communication Theory Qualitative Research in Perspective). Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia; 2015.

      [8] Halberstam J. Female Masculinity. Durham: Duke University Press; 1998.

      [9] Rubent B, Lea P S. Communication and Human Behavior. Jakarta: PT. King Grafindo Persada.; 2013.

      [10] Fakih M. Analysis of Gender and Social Transformation. Yogyakarta: PT Pustaka Student; 1996.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Fachrul Nurhadi, Z., Salamah, U., Destari, Y., & Susanti Suseno, N. (2018). Social Construction of Masculine Women Identity. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.21), 326-329. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17182

    Received date: 2018-08-09

    Accepted date: 2018-08-09

    Published date: 2018-08-08