Performance Efficiency of Higher Education in Indonesia: a Stakeholders’ Perspective

  • Authors

    • Cipto Wardoyo
    • Aulia Herdiani
    • Sulastri .
    • Sulikah .
    2018-08-08
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17196
  • Performance Evaluation, Performance Efficiency, University Ranks, Educational Development Efficiency

  • Abstract

    This study aims at analyzing the necessity of performance evaluation in higher education institutions based on a benchmarking model of Educational Development Efficiency (EDE), which further will be employed to analyze the inclination of stakeholder in deciding which program and university they prefer to choose. The analysis is performed by using binary logistic regression to predict the inclination of stakeholder based on provided assessment factors. The results of this study are consistent with previous studies where input variables in EDE model significantly influence the quality of university outcomes. Furthermore, referring to observed factors, quality of academic services and comprehensive quality of educational institution are emphasized by a stakeholder in choosing program and university, while the rank issued by National Accreditation Institution of Higher Education in Indonesia contributes as supporting information.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Martin E. An application of the data envelopment analysis methodology in the performance assessment of the Zaragoza University departments. Documento de Trabajo. 2003(06):1-19.

      [2] Kong W-H, Fu T-T. Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators. Omega. 2012;40(5):541-9.

      [3] Smith P. University ranking systems are always imperfect: why not aggregate them? 4th Annual International Conference on Political Science, Sociology and International Relations. 2014:72-7.

      [4] Asif M. Determining improvement needs in higher education benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2015;22(1):56-74.

      [5] Wooton S. Data envelopment analysis: a tool for secondary eduaction ranking and benchmarking: Miami University, UMI Dissertation Pro-Quest; 2003.

      [6] Scheerens J. The quality of education at the beginning of the 21st century. The Quality Imperative, UNESCO. 2004.

      [7] Thurstone LL. Attitudes Can Be Measured. American Journal of Sociology. 1928;33(4):529-54.

      [8] Krueger F, Grafman CCNSNIoND, Stroke J, Grafman J. The Neural Basis of Human Belief Systems: Psychology Press; 2012. 260- p.

      [9] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach: Taylor & Francis; 2011. 527- p.

      [10] Ajzen I, Gilbert Cote N. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior. New York: Psychology Press; 2008. p. 289-311.

      [11] Azwar S. Sikap manusia : teori dan pengukurannya / Saifuddin Azwar, Sikap manusia : teori dan pengukurannya / Saifuddin Azwar. 1 SIKAP PANDANGAN,Sikap manusia : teori dan pengukurannya / Saifuddin Azwar, Sikap manusia : teori dan pengukurannya / Saifuddin Azwar. 1988;1988(1988):1-99.

      [12] Loudon DL, Bitta AJD. Consumer behavior: concepts and applications: McGraw-Hill; 1984. 760- p.

      [13] Dharmmesta, Handoko TH, Basu S. Manajemen Pemasaran : Analisa perilaku konsumen / Edisi pertama: BPFE; 2000.

      [14] Agha SR, Kuhail I, Nabi NA, Salem M, Ghanim A. Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2011;4(2):301-25.

      [15] Gourishankar V, Sai Lokachari P. Benchmarking educational development efficiencies of the Indian states: a DEA approach. International Journal of Educational Management. 2012;26(1):99-130.

      [16] Smith P. Ranking and the globalization of higher education. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts. 2012;12:35-69.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Wardoyo, C., Herdiani, A., ., S., & ., S. (2018). Performance Efficiency of Higher Education in Indonesia: a Stakeholders’ Perspective. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.21), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17196

    Received date: 2018-08-09

    Accepted date: 2018-08-09

    Published date: 2018-08-08