University Writing Guidebook for Natural, Social Sciences and Humanities
-
2018-08-08 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17213 -
. -
Abstract
Natural and social sciences have its own uniqueness in seeing, describing and analyzing a phenomenon. Humanities have also its own distinctiveness between them. Literature, as one of department in humanities has its extreme perspective in considering a phenomenon. While natural and social sciences describing fact, literature is indeed describing fiction. These two different paradigms have its consequences to the way of students’ writing for their papers. Since literature as one of humanities beside natural and social sciences in a university, this research investigates the university writing guidebook provided by the university in leading the students’ writing in describing fact and fiction. This research uses content analysis by analyzing four writing guide books emphasizing on how to write the final paper for natural, social sciences and literature (humanities). The result show that the four university writing guidebooks provided the writing for natural and social sciences, namely how to describe and analyze facts. While for literature, on how to analyze fiction, the university writing guidebook does not provide yet. This research contributes for the university that university must provide the rules of final paper for literature students on how to write their final papers.
-
References
[1]. Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2007. Language, Culture, and Education: A Portrait of Contemporary Indonesia. Third Edition. Bandung: CV Andira.
[2]. Barry, Peter, 2002, Beginning Theory: an Introduction to Literary & Cultural Theory, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
[3]. Berg, Bruce L., 2007, Qualitative Research Method for Social Sciences, Boston: Pearson
[4]. Canagarajah, A. Suresh, 2002, Critical Academic Writing and Multilingual Students, United States: The University of Michigan Press.
[5]. Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[6]. Eagleton, Terry, 1983, Literary Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
[7]. Endraswara, Suwardi, 2008, Metodologi Penelitian Sastra, Yogyakarta: PT Media Pressindo.
[8]. Emilia, Emi, 2008, Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi, Bandung: Alfabeta.
[9]. Emilia, Emi. 2005. “A Critical Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Academic Writing in a Tertiary EFL Context in Indonesia.†An Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Melbourne: Department of Language, Literacy and Arts Education, Faculty of Education, the University of Melbourne.
[10]. Fokkema, D. W., 1998, Teori Sastra Abad kedua puluh, Jakarta: Gramedia
[11]. Hatch, Amos. 2002. Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. New York: State University of New York.
[12]. Hyland K., 2000, Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing, Singapore, Pearson Education Limited.
[13]. Jabrohim (Ed.), 2000, Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: PT Hanindita Graha Widya.
[14]. Mahsun, 2005, Metode Penelitian Bahasa, Jakarta: Rajawali
[15]. Maxwell, Joseph A. 1996. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 41. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[16]. Nealon, Jeffrey & Giroux, Susan Searls, 2003, The theory toolbox, USA: Rowman & Littlefield publishers
[17]. Pradopo, Rahmat Djoko, 1995, Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik dan Penerapannya, Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[18]. Ratna, Nyoman Kutha, 2007, Teori, Metode dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra, Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
[19]. Semi, Atar, 1993, Metode Penelitian Sastra, Bandung: Angkasa.
[20]. Silverman, David, 1993, Interpreting Qualitative Data, California: Sage Publication.
[21]. Silverman, David. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research. Second Edition. London: SAGE Publications.
[22]. Simon & Schuster, 1966, How to analyze fiction, USA: Monarch Press.
[23]. Swales, J., and Feak, C., 1994, Academic writing for graduate students: A course for nonnative speakers of English, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[24]. UPI, 2007, Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah, Bandung.
[25]. Watson, George, 1986, The Literary Ctitics London: The Hogarts Press.
[26]. Wellek and Warren, 1978, Theory of Literature, England: Penguin Book.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Aulawi, H., Ali Ramdhani, M., & Sulaeman, D. (2018). University Writing Guidebook for Natural, Social Sciences and Humanities. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.21), 464-466. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17213Received date: 2018-08-09
Accepted date: 2018-08-09
Published date: 2018-08-08